映画で「based on a true story」というのがありますが、似たものです。他人が発表した文章(英語)を「拾い読みし、足したり、引いたり、変えたり、コネくりまわしました」。








(姓, 名)
122ネカト防止戦略ネカト防止バーナード・フォードFord, Bernard2022JDSupraStrategies for Preventing Research Misconduct
121米国の研究不正規則の改訂ネカト規則テレサ・デフィーノDefino, Theresa2022Report on Research ComplianceGroups Seek Substantive Revisions to HHS Misconduct Regs
121米国の研究不正規則の改訂ネカト規則エリー・キンケイドKincaid, Ellie2022Retraction WatchUS federal research watchdog wants your input
121米国の研究不正規則の改訂ネカト規則健康福祉省Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary2022Federal RegisterRequest for Information and Comments on the 2005 Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct
120研究データ共有のハウツウ・ガイドデータ共有ジョスリン・カイザーKaiser, Jocelyn2023ScienceReady, set, share: Researchers brace for new data-sharing rules
119米国・会計検査院:「もっと厳密・透明に研究しろ!」研究再現性キャンディス・ライトWright, Candice N.2022U.S. GAOResearch Reliability: Federal Actions Needed to Promote Stronger Research Practices
119米国・会計検査院:「もっと厳密・透明に研究しろ!」研究再現性ジョーダン・スミスSmith, Jordan2022MeriTalkGAO: Feds Must Promote Stronger Research Practices
118ネカトハンター:スマット・クライド(Smut Clyde)ネカトハンターホリー・エルスElse, Holly2022NatureWhat makes an undercover science sleuth tick? Fake-paper detective speaks out
117著名文学者名の科学論文出版アダム・マーカスMarcus, Adam2022Retraction WatchMeet the publisher making the science of Bronte, Faulkner, and Whitman available for the first time
116査読にお金を払う時代?出版シルビア・グッドマンGoodman, Sylvia2022Chronicle of Higher EducationIs It Time to Pay Peer Reviewers?
115ネカト告発、もっと必要!ネカト告発アマン・マジムダールMajmudar, Aman2022UndarkOpinion: Science Needs Better Fraud Detection – And More Whistleblowers
114ビックのネカトハンター人生ネカトハンターエリザベス・ビックBik, Elisabeth2022New York TimesOpinion | Science Has a Nasty Photoshopping Problem
113オーストラリア南極基地も性的暴行・セクハラまみれ性不正メレディス・ナッシュNash, Meredith2022Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and WaterSummary of Nash review of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the Australian Antarctic program
112迫害された南極の性的暴行・セクハラ抗議者性不正ジェフリー・マービスMervis, Jeffrey2022ScienceSexual harassment ignored by U.S. Antarctic research program, employees say
111南極研究は性的暴行・セクハラ地獄性不正ケイティ・ランギンLangin, Katie2022ScienceSexual harassment plagues Antarctic research
110フェイク論文のAI簡単作成法フェイクアキ・ペリッツPeritz, Aki2022Wire SciencePlagiarism: AI Is Making It Easier Than Ever for Students to Cheat ?
109米国・科学庁(NSF)の盗用調査と盗用防止策盗用テレサ・デフィーノDefino, Theresa2022Report on Research ComplianceCommon, Costly, Preventable? NSF OIG Finds Pearls in Review of 10 Years of Plagiarism Cases
109米国・科学庁(NSF)の盗用調査と盗用防止策盗用科学庁NSF2022NSFObservations from NSF Plagiarism Investigations and Strategies to Prevent Plagiarism
108米英中の大学院生の盗用裁判裁判ジョナサン・ベイリーBailey, Jonathan2017Plagiarism TodayAcademic Plagiarism, Real Courts
107巨額な研究ロス研究費レイチェル・クーパーCooper, Rachel2019ReformMedical research waste: expensive to ignore, cheap to fix
107巨額な研究ロス研究費イアン・チャーマーズChalmers, Ian2009LancetAvoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
107巨額な研究ロス研究費ポール・グラショウGlasziou, Paul2016BMJIs 85% of health research really “wasted”?
106「研究規範・研究公正」違犯の記事と事件の統計分析記事分析アンナ・アーモンドArmond, Anna2021BMC Med EthicsA scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases
105ディープフェイクの脅威フェイクカトリーナ・クレーマーKrämer, Katrina2022Chemistry WorldAI-generated images could make it almost impossible to detect fake papers
105ディープフェイクの脅威フェイクニュースNEWS2022Mind MattersThe Threat That Deepfakes Pose to Science Journals
105ディープフェイクの脅威画像ロンシャン・ユー、俞容山Yu、Rongshan2022PatternsDeepfakes: A new threat to image fabrication in scientific publications?
104殺害脅迫、幽霊研究者、別人なりすまし:研究不正の不思議な世界ネカトエリーゼ・ワージントンWorthington, Elise2022ABC NewsDeath threats, ghost researchers and sock puppets: Inside the weird, wild world of dodgy academic research
103大学の性不正・アカハラを取り締まるNIHの新規則性不正・アカハラマイク・ラウアーLauer, Mike、(Michael Lauer)2022NIH Extramural NEXUSCongress Strengthens NIH’s Ability To Address Harassment in NIH-funded Activities
103大学の性不正・アカハラを取り締まるNIHの新規則性不正・アカハラジョスリン・カイザーKaiser, Jocelyn2022ScienceNIH gains new power to police sexual harassment
102ネカト告発のいろいろ告発レックス・ブーテBouter, Lex M.2017Accountability in ResearchBoth Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection
102ネカト告発のいろいろ告発エリザベス・ビックBik, Elisabeth2021twitterMicrobiomDigest
101JBCの新しい研究公正部長はネカト者研究公正レオニッド・シュナイダーSchneider, Leonid2022For Better ScienceNew Expert at JBC
101JBCの新しい研究公正部長はネカト者研究公正学会スタッフASBMB Today Staff2022Society news briefsNew data integrity team members
100オーストラリアに研究公正局を作れ研究公正デイヴィッド・ボーVaux, David2022ConversationAustralia needs an Office for Research Integrity to catch up with the rest of the world
99大学は不正行為の隠蔽を止めよ!隠蔽ジュリー・マクファーレンMacfarlane, Julie2022Times Higher EducationHigher education must stop covering up misconduct
98守秘義務契約の使用廃止:英国の大学隠蔽ミシェル・ドネランDonelan, Michelle2022GOV.UKUniversities pledge to end use of non-disclosure agreements
97ビックのネカト告発方法告発エリザベス・ビックBik, Elisabeth2019Science Integrity DigestHow to report misconduct to a journal
96ビックの画像不正基準画像不正エリザベス・ビックBik, Elisabeth2020Science Integrity DigestOops!… I Did It Again. When to correct or retract?
952021年の研究公正局クロ件数が3件だった理由ネカトアイヴァン・オランスキーOransky, Ivan2022Retraction WatchA U.S. federal science watchdog made just three findings of misconduct in 2021. We asked them why.
94研究公正局のネカト調査集計:2021年ネカト研究公正局Office of Research Integrity2022ORI BlogORI Case Closures
93研究再現性の改善策:英議会の科学技術委員会研究再現性ドロシー・ビショップBishop, Dorothy2022Times Higher EducationWhat can be done to improve research integrity?
92研究公正の改善策:撤回監視の見解研究公正アリソン・アブリティスAbritis, Alison2022Reproducibility and research integritySupplementary Written Evidence Submitted by Retraction Watch and The Center for Scientific Integrity (RRE0097)
91ファイザー社のワクチン治験ネカト:3の3製薬企業ハリー・デ・ケットヴィルde Quetteville, Harry2021TelegraphBehind the scenes of Pfizer’s ‘world-beating’ vaccine trials
90ファイザー社のワクチン治験ネカト:3の2製薬企業マリアン・デマシDemasi, Maryanne2021Investigative JournalismFresh doubts over data integrity in Pfizer mRNA trial
89ファイザー社のワクチン治験ネカト:3の1製薬企業ポール・タッカーThacker, Paul D.2021BMJCovid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
88真鍮(しんちゅう)のドレークプレート(Drake’s Plate of Brass)ネカトケイティ・ダウドDowd, Katie2021SFGATEThis ‘treasure’ rewrote California history. It was an elaborate hoax
87臨床試験での研究不正ネカトアレサンドラ・バッファBaffa, Alessandra2021Clinical LeaderWhat Is Scientific Research Misconduct Fraud In Clinical Research
86学術公正認知度の世界ランキング研究公正ユホン(ヘレン)・ジャンZhang, Yuehong(Helen)2021Forensic Sciences ResearchThe next steps in academic integrity — education, awareness, norms, duty and law
85心理学でのデータねつ造と改革ネカトイェルテ・ヴィヒャーツWicherts, Jelte2021NatureHow misconduct helped psychological science to thrive
84研究偽造と絵画偽造ネカトジェレミー・フォックスFox, Jeremy2021Dynamic EcologyScientific fraud vs. art forgery (or, why are so many scientific frauds so easy to detect?)
83研究の進め方と論文出版の大改革出版シミーン・ヴァジーアVazire, Simine2021iai newsScience needs a radical overhaul
82研究不正行為の合意なき定義研究公正ヒュー・デスモンドDesmond, Hugh2021BioethicsResearch integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences
82研究不正行為の合意なき定義研究公正キャスリーン・オグレイディO’Grady, Cathleen2021ScienceWhat is research misconduct? European countries can’t agree
81セクハラは文化習慣の問題で制度の問題ではない性不正クリムゾン編集委員会Crimson Editorial Board2021Harvard CrimsonSexual Harassment Is A Culture Problem, Not A Policy One
80どうして研究不正するのか?ネカトジョナサン・ヘリントンHerington, Jonathan2021Research EthicsA phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct
79研究者の51%がクログレイ、8%がねつ造・改ざんしていたネカトヨップ・ドフリージャde Vrieze, Jop2021ScienceLandmark research integrity survey finds questionable practices are surprisingly common
79研究者の51%がクログレイ、8%がねつ造・改ざんしていたネカトゴウリ・ゴパラクリシュナGopalakrishna, Gowri2021MetaArXivPrevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: a survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands
78研究での成功とは何か?研究公正ノエミ・オベール・ボンAubert Bonn, Noemie2021Research Integrity and Peer ReviewRethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
78研究での成功とは何か?研究ノエミ・オベール・ボンAubert Bonn, Noemie2021Research Integrity and Peer ReviewRethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) — a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science
77研究倫理教育は時間の無駄?研究公正ジェマ・コンロイConroy, Gemma2020Nature IndexIs research integrity training a waste of time?
76記事削除の要請を拒否研究公正アダム・マーカスMarcus, Adam2021Retraction WatchFalse claims allegations cost Mass General, former Harvard researcher more than $1 million
76記事削除の要請を拒否研究公正アダム・マーカスMarcus, Adam2021Retraction WatchAttorney asks Retraction Watch to remove post because client has lost out on opportunities
75扇情的な科学用語は危険用語ジェマ・コンロイConroy, Gemma2021Nature IndexRise of the zombie ants. Why hype is creeping into scientific papers.
74研究に貢献した学部生や実験助手を共著者にせよ著者在順エミリー・フォガティFogarty, Emily2020ScienceDon’t erase undergrad researchers and technicians from author lists
73画像のAI合成:ウェスタンブロットフェイクペン・ルオLuo, Peng2021bioRxivEmerging Concern of Scientific Fraud: Deep Learning and Image Manipulation
72大学が守るプライバシーは誰のため?情報開示エイミー・ベンセネヘイヴァーBensenhaver, Amye2020State JournalGuest columnist: Whose ‘privacy’ is UK actually protecting?
71ネカトハンター・ビックを脅迫告発キャスリーン・オグレディO’Grady, Cathleen2021ScienceScientists rally around misconduct consultant facing legal threat after challenging COVID-19 drug researcher
71ネカトハンター・ビックを脅迫告発メリッサ・デイビーDavey, Melissa2021GuardianWorld expert in scientific misconduct faces legal action for challenging integrity of hydroxychloroquine study
70口先だけでなく実行しろよな、研究公正研究公正ニールス・マイルガー(ド)Mejlgaard, Niels2020NatureResearch integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk
69ネカトを犯罪とします?ネカトゲルト・ヘルゲソンHelgesson, Gert2018Med Health Care and PhilosCriminalization of scientific misconduct
68ネカト者名等の黒塗り:カナダネカト不記載不記載2011NatureBlackened names
67ネカト申し立て予備調査記録の欠落ネカトロバート・バウフヴィッツBauchwitz, Robert2016Sci Eng EthicsThe Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits
66米国の2020年採択ネカト研究研究公正研究公正局Office of Research Integrity2020ORI BlogORI Awards Six Research Integrity Grants
65盗用検出ソフトの裏をかく方法ネカト不記載不記載2020UCAECHO.NETIs it Possible to Fool Turnitin?
64ネカト被災者ネカトカタリーナ・ジマーZimmer, Katarina2020ScientistWhen Your Supervisor Is Accused of Research Misconduct
63新しい学術不正:評価数値の操作学術不正マリオ・ビアジオリBiagioli, Mario2020Los Angeles Review of BooksFraud by Numbers: Metrics and the New Academic Misconduct
62臨床研究の参加者(治験者)が嘘をついたらネカトダミアン・マクナマラMcNamara, Damian2020MedscapeLies and Desperation: How, Why ‘Professional Study Subjects’ Skew Clinical Research
61米国・科学庁(NSF)のネカト制裁の拙劣さ行政テレサ・デフィーノDefino, Theresa2020Report on Research ComplianceOIG Details Debarment Recommendations In Misconduct Cases; NSF Cites Timing for Inaction
60食品医薬品局(FDA)が臨床試験のネカトを隠蔽行政ピーター・サイモンズSimons, Peter2020Mad in AmericaFDA Inspections Revealing Research Misconduct Hidden from Public View
59学術詐欺の解決法ネカトポール・ウィルソンWilson, Paul2020ExchangesAcademic Fraud: Solving the crisis in modern academia
58欧州の研究公正ガバナンスネカトサンドラ・ベンディシオーリBendiscioli, Sandra2020 EMBO policy reportGovernance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe
57デタラメ論文と批判されたらネカトアンディ・テイTay, Andy2020Nature IndexWhat to do when your research comes under fire
56中国はネカトを厳罰化ネカトデイヴィッド・シラノスキーCyranoski, David2018NatureChina introduces ‘social’ punishments for scientific misconduct
55ネカトを刑法犯とするネカトラファエル・ダルレDal-Ré, Rafael2020Research EthicsShould research misconduct be criminalized?
54遺伝学論文の撤回理由撤回ラファエル・ダルレDal-Ré, Rafael2019J Med Genet.Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
53撤回監視データベースから学ぶ撤回ジェフリー・ブレイナードBrainard, Jeffrey2018ScienceWhat a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’
52科学公正とCOVID-19科学公正ジェシー・グッドマンGoodman, Jesse L.2020JAMAFinding Effective Treatments for COVID-19: Scientific Integrity and Public Confidence in a Time of Crisis
51学術界のイジメと防止行動アカハラナフィサ・ジャダブジJadavji, Nafisa M2019ecrLife”My PhD broke me”—bullying in academia and a call to action
50研究界のアカハラ問題アカハラホリー・エルスElse, Holly2018NatureDoes science have a bullying problem?
49教授のアカハラに対する院生の反応アカハラスザンヌ・モリスMorris, Suzanne E.2011Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & HumDoctoral Students’ Experiences of Supervisory Bullying
48学術界のイジメと戦うアカハラマリア・スチュワートStewart, Maria Shine2018Inside Higher EdBattling Bullying in Academe
47米国の2019年採択ネカト研究研究公正研究公正局Office of Research Integrity2019ORI Blog8 Research on Research Integrity Grants Awarded
46グレインフリー(穀物不使用)ドッグフードニセ科学スティーブン・ノベラNovella, Steven2019NeuroLogica BlogGrain-Free Dog Food
45ネカトの要因と対策ネカトダニエル・ファネーリFanelli, Daniele2019Science and Engineering EthicsTesting Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications
44出版プレッシャーでネカトするわけじゃないネカトダニエル・ファネーリFanelli, Daniele2015PLoS ONEMisconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
43ジェネリック医薬品のウソ製薬キャサリン・イーバンEban, Katherine2019 EccoBottle of Lies: The Inside Story of the Generic Drug Boom
43ジェネリック医薬品のウソ製薬2019CBS NEWSAllegations of widespread fraud raise questions about the safety of generic drugs made overseas
42査読の半分は院生やポスドクの代筆出版ゲイリー・マクダウェルMcDowell, Gary S.2019BioRxivCo-reviewing and ghostwriting by early career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts
42査読の半分は院生やポスドクの代筆出版キュ・チンチョンJin Chung, Kyu2019Archives of Plastic SurgeryThe peer review system of Archives of Plastic Surgery: Current status and plans for improvement
41はよ作れ米国・研究政策委員会ネカトシーケー・ガンセイラスGunsalus, C. K.2019NatureOverdue: a US advisory board for research integrity
40モンテネグロのネカト禁止法法律2019EducationWorldMontenegro: Stern anti-cheating laws
40モンテネグロのネカト禁止法法律ミコ・タタロビッチTatalovic, Mico2019Retraction WatchMontenegro just made plagiarism illegal. What does it hope to achieve?
39要約盗用(compression plagiarism)盗用マイケル・ドハティDougherty, Michael2019ArgumentationThe Pernicious Effects of Compression Plagiarism on Scholarly Argumentation
39要約盗用(compression plagiarism)盗用アイヴァン・オランスキーOransky, Ivan2019Retraction WatchCompression plagiarism: An “under-recognized variety” that software will miss
38盗用ソフトは不完全なのに1700億円盗用デボラ・ヴィーバー=ヴルフWeber-Wulff, Debora2019NaturePlagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem
スローン・ケタリング記念がんセンター企業資金不開示ポール・タッカーThacker, Paul D2018BMJTime to act on industry influence over medicine and lay zombie arguments to rest
37捕食学術誌のICMJE推薦学術誌リストへの浸食捕食ラファエル・ダルレDal-Ré, Rafael2019Netherlands Journal of MedicineArticle: Potential predatory journals are colonizing the ICMJE recommendations list of followers
36まず論文掲載、後からキュレート出版ボードー・スターンStern, Bodo M.2019PLoS BiolA proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences
35プランSの攻防出版シャーロット・ハウグHaug, Charlotte J.2019N Engl J MedNo Free Lunch — What Price Plan S for Scientific Publishing?
34捕食会議は踊る捕食ジャック・グローブGrove, Jack2017Times Higher EducationPredatory conferences ‘now outnumber official scholarly events’
33捕食学術誌に出版する意図捕食ナメメ・シャゲイShaghaei, Najmeh2018LIBER QuarterlyBeing a deliberate prey of a predator: Researchers’ thoughts after having published in predatory journal
32捕食学術誌に注意!捕食ハニー・シャルマSharma, Hunny2018J Postgrad MedPredatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science
31スコーパス(Scopus)中の捕食論文捕食ヴィト・マカセックMacháček, Vít2017Praha : Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR v.v.i.Predatory journals in Scopus
30南アの論文報奨金論文報奨デイヴィッド・ヘディングHedding, David W.2019NaturePayouts push professors towards predatory journals
29ケイレブ・ラック助教授の捕食学術誌・捕食事件捕食ケイレブ・ラックLack, Caleb2018Center for InquiryPreying on the Predatory Journals: A Case Study
28ジョン・マックールの捕食論文悪ふざけ捕食ジョン・マックールMcCool, John2017ScientistWhy I Published in a Predatory Journal
27論文出版での脅迫・贈収賄・性的サービス論文報奨キーKey2010ChinaHushCommunication University professor’s casting couch affair
27論文出版での脅迫・贈収賄・性的サービス論文報奨アリソン・マクックMcCook, Alison2017Retraction WatchPay to play? Three new ways companies are subverting academic publishing
27論文出版での脅迫・贈収賄・性的サービス論文と性サラ・ネッカーNecker, Sarah2014Social Science SpaceEconomists Behaving Badly Linked to Pressure to Publish
26論文報奨金論文報奨無記名(編集委員)2017NaturePublish or impoverish: Don’t pay prizes for published science
26論文報奨金論文報奨アリソン・アブリティスAbritis, Alison2017ScienceCash bonuses for peer-reviewed papers go global
26論文報奨金論文報奨イシマエル・トンガイTongai, Ishmael2013UWNSOUTH AFRICA 
Incentives for researchers drive up publication output
26論文報奨金論文報奨ウェイ・クアンQuan, Wei2017arxiv.orgPublish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016)
25ダニエル・ローパーズ「Nature」社長のスピーチ出版ダニエル・ローパーズRopers, Daniel2018NatureThe quest for more value – challenges of the scientific ecosystem in the absence of coordination: A Long Read
24捕食業者と研究者はグル捕食カタリナ・ピサンスキーPisanski, Katarzyna2017NaturePredatory journals recruit fake editor
24捕食業者と研究者はグル捕食ジーナ・コラータKolata, Gina2017NY TimesA Scholarly Sting Operation Shines a Light on ‘Predatory’ Journals
24捕食業者と研究者はグル捕食ジーナ・コラータKolata, Gina2017NY TimesMany Academics Are Eager to Publish in Worthless Journals
23世界の理工医学(STM)学術出版の全体像出版ロブ・ジョンソンJohnson, Rob2018STM ReportAn overview of scientific and scholarly publishing 5th edition
22捕食出版社・オミックス社の経験捕食イゼット・マシックMasic, Izet2017Med ArchPredatory Publishing – Experience with OMICS International
21捕食学術社からのメチャクチャな勧誘捕食エリック・メルシエMercier, Éric2017Postgrad Med J.Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience
20ビールのライフワーク:捕食出版社との闘い捕食ジェフリー・ビールBeall, Jeffrey2017Biochem Med (Zagreb)What I learned from predatory publishers
19捕食学術誌の餌食にならない方法捕食リー・ガニョンGagnon, Lea2018Nature IndiaPublishing tips: How not to fall for a predatory journal
189割の研究者が研究クログレイクログレイアンソニー・アルティーノArtino Jr, Anthony R.2018bioRxivEthical Shades of Gray: Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education
17研究ネカトのコスト:1件5千万円コストエリザベス・ギャモンGammon, Elizabeth2013J Health Care FinanceResearch misconduct oversight: defining case costs
16もっと信頼できる調査報告書を調査シーケー・ガンセイラスGunsalus, C. K.2018JAMAInstitutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility
15著者の論文貢献度指数著者在順ステファン・ボイヤーBoyer, Stéphane2017Research Integrity and Peer ReviewPercentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articles
14博士論文の代行します53~630万円論文代行キャス・エリスEllis, Cath2018International Journal for Educational IntegrityThe infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites
13教科書著者:製薬企業からの報酬の非開示利益相反ブライアン・パイパーPiper, Brian J.2018AJOB Empirical BioethicsUndisclosed conflicts of interest among biomedical textbook authors
12製薬企業が臨床試験を腐敗させた製薬ジェイ・アムステルダムAmsterdam, Jay D2017Psychiatr. Pol.Industry-corrupted psychiatric trials
11大学と企業のネカト比較事件分析サイモン・ゴデチャルGodecharle, Simon2017Sci Eng EthicsScientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities
10ネカトの仕方教えます事件分析ニコラ・リゥジエーRougier, Nicolas P.2017hal-01562601Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct
9ネカト事件40件の分析事件分析ウルフガング・ストレーベStroebe, Wolfgang2012Perspectives on Psychological ScienceScientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
8ロシアの盗用博士論文盗博アンドレイ・ロストフツェフRostovtsev, Andrei2016Copy, Shake, and PasteFake Academic Degrees in Russia
7生命科学者の書いた研究ネカト総説ネカトデイヴィッド・ボーVaux, David L.2016Handbook of Academic IntegrityScientific misconduct: falsification, fabrication, and misappropriation of credit
6研究ネカト被告発者が後悔する8つの無知ネカトカラン・シュタインStein, Callan2015Retraction Watch8 things you might not know about research misconduct proceedings
5研究ジャーナルの論文撤回規定論文撤回デイヴィッド・レズニックResnik, David B.2015J Med Libr AssocRetraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor
4米国・細胞生物学会の研究再現性問題への対策再現性マーク・ウィニーWiney, Mark2015A White Paper from the American Society for Cell BiologyHow Can Scientists Enhance Rigor in Conducting Basic Research and Reporting Research Results
3ステネック(Nicholas H. Steneck)の研究公正の古典的論文研究公正ニコラス・ステネックSteneck, Nicholas H.2006Sci Eng EthicsFostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions
2フィールド研究界に蔓延するセクハラと性的暴力性不正キャスリン・クランシ―Clancy, Kathryn2014PLOS ONESurvey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault
1ねつ造医学論文を出版する捕食出版社捕食エリザベス・セグランSegran, Elizabeth2015Fast CompanyCuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?
1ねつ造医学論文を出版する捕食出版社捕食ジョセフ・ストロンバーグStromberg , Joseph2014VoxA paper by Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel was accepted by two scientific journals
1ねつ造医学論文を出版する捕食出版社捕食ジョン・ボハノンBohannon, John2013ScienceWho's Afraid of Peer Review?
1ねつ造医学論文を出版する捕食出版社捕食クロエ・コスタCosta, Chloe2015Cheat SheetWhy Medicine is Plagued with Fake Research

ーーーーーー ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー


2023-5Verlopen domeinnamen van wetenschappelijke tijdschriften kunnen een goudmijn zijn NRC◎乗取学術誌
2023-5Use of positive terms and certainty language in retracted and non-retracted articles: The case of biochemistryJournal of Information Science〇撤回論文
2023-5Worries mount about misinformation in scienceaxios〇科学の誤情報
2023-9Too official to be effective: An empirical examination of unofficial information channel and continued use of retracted articlesResearch Policy撤回論文の引用
2023-5The U.S. Gave Chinese Scientists Thousands During COVID For Ethics Training, Addressing ‘Research Misconduct’The Daily CallerNIHの中国人向けガイダンス
2023-5Report a Concerngrants.nih.gov◎米国NIHのガイダンス
2023-5Reporting research misconductukrio◎英国の新しいガイダンス
2023-5Which factors are associated with fraud in medical imaging research?European Journal of Radiology〇ねつ造画像原因
2023-5Whistleblowers need more protectionTimes Higher Education (THE)〇告発者保護
2023-5Point of View: Beware ‘persuasive communication devices’ when writing and reading scientific articleseLife文章作法
2023-5What to communicate in retraction notices? - Xu - Learned Publishing - Wiley Online Library有料〇撤回公告
2023-5NIH toughens enforcement of delayed clinical trials reportingScience | AAAS〇臨床試験報告
2023-5A conversation with Michael Lauer Science | AAAS〇中国排斥問題
2023-5Survey Finds Cheating Is Common in Graduate SchoolPhysics〇院生カンニング
2023-5Key factors associated with fraud in medical imaging researchRadiology Business◎ネカト
2023-7Which factors are associated with fraud in medical imaging research?European Journal of Radiology◎ネカト
2023-5Fostering A Culture Of Trust: Insights On Academic Integrity And Research Ethics – AnalysisEurasia Review◎公正文化
2023-5Research assessment exercises are necessary — but we need to learn to do them betternature〇評価
2023-5Opinion: The peer-review process is in need of some scrutinyGlobe and Mail〇査読
2023-5The Newest Way to Buy an Advantage in College AdmissionsProPublica〇高校性向け代筆
2023-5Indian PhDs, professors are paying to publish in real-sounding, fake journals. It's a racketprintインド代筆
2023-5When There’s Misconduct From Scientist In Sensitive Organisation Like ISRO, Dismissal From Service Isn’t Illegal: SC Upholds Scientist's Dismissalverdictumインド裁判
2023-5Secretly Funded Climate Obstruction Keeps the Fossil Fuel Fires BurningecoRI News〇気候変動ウソ
2023-5Guest post: When whistleblowers need lawyers Retraction Watch●告発
2023-5Top research institute had seven years to act on misconduct complaintsbrisbane times〇ネカト調査
2023-5Peer review is broken. Paying referees could fix itTimes Higher Education (THE)〇査読
2023-5Support for those affected by scientific misconduct is crucialNature Human Behaviour有料〇ネカト被災者
2023-5How This Doctor Wrote Dozens of Science Papers With ChatGPTdaily beast〇ChatGPT
2023-5How to publish responsible reproducible research THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect〇ネカト
2023-5How to publish responsible reproducible research THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect〇ネカト
2023-5Supporting diamond open access journals. Interest and feasibility of direct funding mechanismsbioRxiv〇出版
2023-5Study reveals scale of ‘science scam’ in academic publishingFinancial Times●ネカト氾濫
2023-5One in five articles published in journals may contain faked datainteresting engineering●ネカト氾濫
2023-5Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-flagging Method Indicates Mass ProductionmedRxiv●ネカト氾濫
2023-5Fake scientific papers are alarmingly commonScience | AAAS●ネカト氾濫
2023-5The Truth PoliceBBC Sounds◎ネカト警察
2023-5Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirementsBMC Medicine | Full Text9年間で2500憶円ムダ
2023-5Saudi universities entice top scientists to switch affiliations — sometimes with cashnature◎大学ランキング工作
2023-5Reproducibility and Research Integrity - Science, Innovation and Technology CommitteeUK Parliament committee●撤回2か月
2023-5Retractions should not take longer than two months, says UK Parliament committeeRetraction Watch●撤回2か月
2023-5Paper with authorship posted for sale retracted nearly two years after Retraction Watch reportRetraction Watch●著者権売買
2023-5Support for those affected by scientific misconduct is crucialNature Human Behaviour有料
2023-5Homeopathy Research Hits New LowSkeptical Inquirer○Homeopathy
2023-5Saudi scientist tells colleagues, ‘Stop this academic fraud’ Science & Tech | EL PAÍS English◎大学ランキング
2023-4One of the worst ever tobacco control papers is ‘corrected’ The Counterfactualたばこ
2023-4How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought Waltman - Learned Publishing - Wiley Online Library査読
2023-4When It Comes to Misconduct, Fellows Appeared Uninformed, Unwilling, Hesitant to Report Suspicions Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) - JDSupra◎Theresa Defino
2023-4Scrutiny for thee but not for me: When open science research isn’t openSteve Haroz's blog◎オープンサイエンス
2023-4Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling Research Integrity and Peer Review | Full Text◎査読コスト
2023-4How Do Scientists Perceive the Relationship Between Ethics and Science? A Pilot Study of Scientists’ Appeals to Values Science and Engineering Ethics◎倫理観
2023-4REED: More on Self-Correcting Science and Replications: A Critical ReviewReplication Network再現性
2023-4EU governments to rein in unfair academic publishers and unsustainable feesScience|Business出版
2023-4The Double-Cost of Green-via-GoldScholarly Kitchen出版
2023-4Reviewer comment on NSF fellowship application sparks outrage on TwitterC&ENNSF
2023-4The Geography of Retracted Papers: Showcasing a Crossref–Dimensions–NETSCITY Pipeline for the Spatial Analysis of Bibliographic DataOrvium◎撤回国 Guillaume Cabanac
2023-4Torturing data to predict bitcoin prices: A book excerptRetraction WatchGary Smith、経済本
2023-4For inclusivity, we must rethink citation relevance Times Higher Education (THE)
2023-4Flawed, futile, and fabricated—features that limit confidence in clinical research in pain and anaesthesia: a narrative reviewBritish Journal of Anaesthesia◎麻酔学のネカト
2023-4Advice for respondents UK Research Integrity Office
2023-4Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford’s Law Research Integrity and Peer Review | Full Text
2023-4University ethics boards are not ready for Indigenous scholarsnature人種差別
2023-4ChatGPT rejection sparks AI debateTimes Higher Education (THE)ChatGPT
2023-4Scientific authorship in the time of ChatGPTOpinion | Chemistry WorldChatGPT
2023-4Trends in retractions as AI arms race on misconduct loomsNiche論文撤回増
2023-4Could Ice Cream Possibly Be Good for You?Atlanticアイス
2023-4Detection tool developed to fight flood of fake academic papersFinancial Times 有料◎論文工場
2023-4UWindsor launches hotline for whistleblowers to report misconductCBC News◎コクハラ
2023-4NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academiaScientific Reports
2023-3Changing the paradigm of researchJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice?
2023Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributionsNature Communications◎MeRIT
2023Wiley and Hindawi to retract 1,200 more papers for compromised peer reviewRetraction Watch多量撤回
2023A high-quality cloned journal has duped hundreds of scholars, and has no reason to stopRetraction Watch◎乗取学術誌
2023The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals: Threats and OpportunitiesFT◎論文工場中国
2023The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals: Threats and OpportunitiesJAMA | JAMA Network〇巨大学術誌
2023AI makes plagiarism harder to detect, argue academics – in paper written by chatbotGuardian〇盗用とAI
2023Pall of suspicion: NIH’s secretive ‘China initiative’ has destroyed scores of academic careersScience | AAAS〇中国排斥
2023The Cape Town Statement on fairness, equity and diversity in researchnature〇研究公正
2023Octopus and ResearchEquals aim to break the publishing mouldnature出版
2023Meet the Stanford Professor at the Center of the Knock-Down, Drag-Out Math Warschronicle数学教育
2023Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines PLOS ONE◎透明性
2023More and more sheets are being pulled outbaltimore gay life論文撤回
2023U.S. government agencies may have been double billed for projects in Wuhan, China, records indicate; probe launchedCBS News政府機関詐欺
2023PNAS is Not a Good Journal - by moin syed Get Syeducated◎出版
2023Responsible Conduct of Research - Preparedness for Times of CrisisJournal of Clinical and Translational Science◎研究公正
2023Geneticists should rethink how they use race and ethnicity, panel urgesScience | AAAS人種
2023From Cats to Chatbots: How Non-Humans Are Authoring Scientific PapersDiscover Magazine◎著者在順
2023On peer review—then, now, and soon to be?PNAS◎査読
2023Catching scientfic fraud could get a lot harder thanks to AI Register〇AI
2023Strife at eLife: inside a journal’s quest to upend science publishingnature出版
2023When journals don’t meet their ethical guidelines, will anyone hold them accountable?Retraction Watch実験動物
2023Why open data is critical during review: An example Steve Haroz;s blog◎データ公開
2023The only way to end scientific fraud is to actually punish the culprits著者:Stuart Ritchie◎有料記事、ネカト処罰
2023Deception DetectionTony Alves虚偽検出
2023Is writing a book chapter still a waste of time? Impact of Social Sciences著書の分担
2023Is Economics Self-Correcting? Replications in the American Economic Review Ruhr Economic Papers #1005経済学の総説
2023Why we usually can't tell when a review is fake Planet Money : NPR評価、口コミ
2023From Piltdown Man to anti-vaxxers ... What science’s worst hoaxes can teach usGuardian◎ネカト
2023Open letter to CNRS: Need for transparent and robust response when research misconduct is foundBishopBlog●ネカト透明性
2023Being positive about negative resultsChemistry World〇否定的結果
2023Misconduct in medical research endangers healthNew Indian Express◎医学のネカト
2023How many times can a journal be hijacked?Retraction Watch◎乗取学術誌
2023How to tackle scientific fraudEconomist◎ネカト、有料
2023There is a worrying amount of fraud in medical researchfinance.yahoo、Economist◎医学のネカト
2023Mirrors and copulation are abominable because they increase the number of mice
By Smut Clyde
For Better Science〇論文工場
2023Retracting my paper was painful. But it helped me grow as a scientist Science | AAAS〇撤回経験
2023Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get offnature査読
2023Inaccuracy in the Scientific Record and Open Postpublication Critique Perspectives on Psychological Science心理学
2023Campaigner Maria Toft ‘forced out’ of doctorateTimes Higher Education (THE)〇 盗コク被
2023Paper with authorship posted for sale retracted over a year after Retraction Watch report Retraction Watch◎ 論文売買
2023Amending the literature through version control Biology Letters
2023Falsifying Attribution for a Bad PunPlagiarism Today
2023Red flags for paper mills need to go beyond the level of individual articles: a case study of Hindawi special issuesPsyArXiv Preprints
2023Highly cited genetics studies found to contain sequence errorsnature
2023Scientists, don’t let your writing resemble something you pulled out of your botScience | AAAS
2023Metrics have their meritsResearch Professional News
2023Post-publication peer reviewing should be compulsoryTimes Higher Education (THE)
2023Elsevier journal under fire for rejecting paper that didn’t cite enough of its old papersChemical & Engineering News
2023As Antarctic Fieldwork Ends, a Sexual Harassment Reckoning LoomsUndark
2023ChatGPT: our study shows AI can produce academic papers good enough for journals – just as some ban itConversation
2023The Whack-a-Mole problem: Hijacked journal still being indexed in Scopus even after discoveryRetraction Watch
2023Who should take responsibility for integrity in research?Impact of Social Sciences
2023Ghosts, gifts, honours and demandsUniversity Affairs
2023Winner take all scienceDYNOMIGHT INTERNET NEWSLETTER
2023Full article: The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconductAccountability in Research
2023Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge | Medical Journals and PublishingJAMA
2023How Scientific is ‘Peer-Reviewed’ Science? American Council on Science and Health
2023How do journals deal with problematic articles. Editorial response of journals to articles commented in PubPeerProfesional de la información
2023A U.S. judge lectures the government on how academic research works Science | AAAS
2023Methodological review would threaten creativity Times Higher Education (THE)
2023Germans take six years to act on plagiarism Times Higher Education (THE)
2023Study: PhD Researchers Forced to Grant ‘Guest Authorships’Laboratory equipment
2023Is science really getting less disruptive — and does it matter if it is?Nature
2023Young physicists say ethics rules are being ignoredNature
2023Full article: Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from EuropeAccountability in Research
2023Publish less, disrupt moreUniversity Affairs
2023Are universities doing enough to address academic misconduct in research? University Affairs
2023Multimillion-dollar trade in paper authorships alarms publishersNature
2023Self-publishing is common among academic-journal editorsNature
2023Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editorsNature Human Behaviour
2023Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time Nature
2023What Happened to All of Science’s Big Breakthroughs?New York Times
2023A Conflict of Interests – Manipulating Peer Review or Research as Usual?Digital Science
2023Scientific fraud: The dark side of research
2023Why are journals so slow at corrections and retractions?STAT
2023Guest Post - Publishers Should Be Transparent About the Capabilities and Limitations of Software They Use to Detect Image Manipulation or DuplicationThe Scholarly Kitchen
2023Alarmed by A.I. Chatbots, Universities Start Revamping How They TeachNew York Times
2023Science: 5 things you can do to stop getting tricked by bad science writing in 2023i News
2023Unearned authorship pervades sciencenature
2023Multimillion-dollar trade in paper authorships alarms publishersnature
2023Scientific Fraud Is Slippery to Catch—but Easier to CombatWIRED
2023‘Institute for facts’ aims to smash fake news |Times Higher Education (THE)
2023Do journals need societies, and do societies need journals?Impact of Social Sciences
2023Hotspots of academic misconduct and misrepresentations among academics in the Republic of Poland, a European Union member stateOSF Preprints
2022'An Open Secret’: Harvard Graduate Students Decry Harassment, Neglect from Faculty Harvard Crimson●アカ
2022Blind spots on western blots: a meta-research study highlighting opportunities to improve figures and methods reporting bioRxiv〇バンド
2022Chinese research reforms ‘a PR exercise’ Times Higher Education (THE)〇中国の科学
2022How a Beloved Teacher Repeatedly Groomed Girls for SexInsider性不正
2022How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity codeAccountability in Research
2022Journal editors and publishers’ legal obligations with respect to medical research misconductResearch Ethics
2022An evaluation of the process of peer reviewPalynology
2022The rise and fall of peer reviewby Adam Mastroianni
2022The Laws of Scienceby Niko McCarty - New Science
2022Stakeholders’ Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries Science and Engineering Ethics
2022What’s integrity got to do with it? Second-year experiences of the Path2Integrity e-learning programmeFACETS
2022FDA oversight of clinical trials is “grossly inadequate,” say expertsBMJ〇臨床研究
2022Preventing fraud in biomedical researchFront. Cardiovasc. Med.
2022White House's open-access directive scrambles long-entrenched modelsSTAT論文閲覧無料
2022Removing author fees can help open access journals make research available to everyoneConversation論文閲覧無料
2022US scientists wary of author publication fees |Times Higher Education (THE)論文閲覧無料
2022OSTP Issues Guidance to Make Federally Funded Research Freely Available Without Delay OSTP | The White House論文閲覧無料
2022White House requires immediate public access to all U.S.-funded research papers by 2025 Science論文閲覧無料
2021Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them Journal of Medical Ethics
2021When is ‘self-plagiarism' OK? New guidelines offer researchers rules for recycling text Science
2019Development of research integrity in France is on the rise: the introduction of research integrity officers was a progress Research Integrity and Peer Review◎仏RIO
2019Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium Science and Engineering Ethics
2018China introduces ‘social’ punishments for scientific misconductnature有料◎中国厳罰化
2015What should an ideal retraction notice look like?Retraction Watch◎論文撤回
2015Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of the Peer-Reviewed LiteratureJAMA Network