2025-8 | 大学ランキングサーカスを止めよう --- Stop the University Ranking Circus | Social Science Space | ●大学ランキング |
2025-8 | スペインの政治家、学位や卒業証書の虚偽記載で履歴書を改ざん --- Wave of Spanish politicians edit CVs over incorrect claims of degrees and diplomas | Spain | The Guardian | ●政治家の学歴詐称 |
2025-8 | Inconsistency in publishers’ responses to integrity concerns about published research Evidence and suggested improvements | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | ●出版社の対応 |
2025-8 | 不正行為を正当化する:科学的不正行為の正当化とその結果 --- Making misconduct make sense: Justifications of scientific wrongdoing and their consequences | SocArXiv Papers | ●不正行為を正当化 |
2025-8 | 学術出版 – 囚人のジレンマに陥っている? --- Academic publishing – stuck in a prisoner’s dilemma? | Leiden Madtrics | ●量より質 |
2025-8 | 詐欺ハンター:偽科学を見抜く | RealClearInvestigations --- Fraud Hunters: Sniffing Out Bogus Science | RealClearInvestigations | 〇ネカトハンター |
2025-8 | 不完全なデータが英国を暗闇に陥れている --- How flawed data is leaving the UK in the dark | ft | ●英国経済:統計データ欠陥 |
2025-8 | 「不正論文を作成する大規模な組織が実在する」との研究結果、「不正論文を異常なほど受理し続けている編集者」が存在するなど深刻な状況 - GIGAZINE | gigazine | ●出版詐欺●日本語メディア。朝日 |
2025-8 | チェンナイに拠点を置くARDAは、査読なしで迅速な出版を保証し、著者権を販売している。 --- How the Chennai-based ARDA guarantees quick publication without peer-reviewing, sells authorship | sciencechronicle | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 「科学」は組織犯罪に他ならない --- The 'Science™' Is Nothing but Organized Crime | freerepublic | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 大規模な詐欺組織が数千件の偽造研究を発表し、問題は深刻化している。「これらのネットワークは本質的に犯罪組織である」 --- A Massive Fraud Ring Is Publishing Thousands of Fake Studies and the Problem is Exploding. “These Networks Are Essentially Criminal Organizations” | zmescience | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 科学詐欺が深刻化 --- Scientific Fraud Escalates Alarmingly | Mirage News | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 不正研究は「科学への信頼を破壊している」 --- Fraudulent Research is 'destroying Trust in Science' | latestly | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 論文工場や共謀審査に関連する広範な学術詐欺を教授らが暴露 --- Professors expose widespread academic fraud linked to paper mills and collusive reviews | CHOSUNBIZ | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 組織的な科学的不正行為が驚くべき速度で増加していることが研究で明らかに --- Organized scientific fraud is growing at an alarming rate, study uncovers | phys.org | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 共同出版詐欺と戦うことは「溢れかえる浴槽をスプーンで空にするのと同じ」と研究共著者は語る --- Fighting coordinated publication fraud is like ‘emptying an overflowing bathtub with a spoon,’ study coauthor says – Retraction Watch | Retraction Watch | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 科学事業にとっての死活問題 --- A do-or-die moment for the scientific enterprise | Reese Richardson | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | 大規模な科学的不正行為を可能にする組織は規模が大きく、回復力があり、急速に成長している --- The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly | PNAS | ●出版詐欺● |
2025-8 | Wileyの素晴らしい取り組み。撤回された論文を参考文献リストに記載するようになりました。撤回通知をクリックすると、撤回日と理由も確認できます。・・・Anna Abalkina: "Great initiative by Wiley! The publisher has started marking retracted papers in reference lists. When you click on the retraction notice, you can also see the date and reason for the retraction. All publishers should adopt this practice. But also screen references during submission." — Bluesky | bsky | ◎abalkina |
2025-7 | ランセット - 世界研究公正会議財団 研究公正委員会 --- The Lancet–World Conferences on Research Integrity Foundation Commission on Research Integrity | Lancet | ●研究公正委員会 |
2025-7 | 韓国の盗作論争におけるデジャブ --- Déjà vu in Korea’s plagiarism controversy | koreajoongangdaily | ●韓国を学ぶ |
2025-7 | 偽の委員会と指標を掲載したAI研究ジャーナルが研究者の論文を人質に取る--- AI research journal with sham board, metrics holds researcher’s paper hostage | Retraction Watch | ●悪徳学術誌 |
2025-7 | 誤りと欺瞞:撤回の「理由」を解明する(パート2/2) --- Error vs. Deception: Unpacking the 'Why' of Retractions (part 2/2) | fosci.substack | ●撤回理由 |
2025-7 | 誤りと欺瞞:撤回の「理由」を解明する(パート 1/2) --- Error vs. Deception: Unpacking the 'Why' of Retractions (part 1/2) | fosci.substack | ●撤回理由 |
2025-7 | ポール・オフィット氏、FDAのワクチン認可における科学的不正を無意識のうちに暴露 --- Paul Offit Unwittingly Exposes Scientific Fraud of FDA's Vaccine Licensure | jeremyrhammond | ●ワクチン接種FDA |
2025-7 | 注目:探偵が撤回で評価され始めている --- Noticed: Sleuths are starting to get credit for retractions | Retraction Watch | ●ネカトハンター顕彰 |
2025-7 | 不連続で馬鹿げた便 – 苦し紛れのフレーズと盗用されたデータでいっぱいのプレプリント --- Discontinuous ridiculous stools – a preprint full of tortured phrases and stolen data | Science Integrity Digest | ●Bik |
2025-7 | 論文出版における新しいクロスリスト方式は、学際研究から得られるデータの増加を促進できるか? --- Could a new cross-listed method of article publication fuel growth of data from interdisciplinary research | Scientific Data | ●複数出版OK |
2025-7 | 「怠惰な」著者? 科学論文の6本に1本が引用文献を誤って記載 --- ‘Lazy’ authors? One in six scientific papers mischaracterize work they cite | Science | AAAS | ●間違った引用 |
2025-7 | AIはまもなく、公開されたすべての研究を監査できるようになるでしょう。これは科学に対する国民の信頼にどのような影響を与えるのでしょうか? --- AI will soon be able to audit all published research – what will that mean for public trust in science? | conversation | ●AI |
2025-7 | レビュー工場のトラブル:MDPIが著者を失望させる方法 --- Trouble at t' (review) mill: How MDPI lets down authors | BishopBlog | ●査読工場 |
2025-7 | 図書館で誠実探偵になる方法 --- How to Become an Integrity Sleuth in the Library | Katina Magazine | ●司書ハンター |
2025-7 | 米国連邦政府におけるデータ操作 --- Data manipulation within the US Federal Government | Lancet | ●連邦政府の改ざん |
2025-7 | 論文工場の商業化 --- Kommerzialisierung von Paper Mills | laborjournal | ●論文工場:Anna Abalkina |
2025-7 | 科学的規範は、社会全体の利益のために働く研究者の行動を形作る --- Scientific norms shape the behavior of researchers working for the greater good | conversation | ●科学的規範 |
2025-7 | 学術界が数百万点の論文出版に「圧倒」され、論文の質に疑問--- Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published | Guardian | ●膨大な論文数 |
2025-7 | 疑わしい研究手法は、成功するキャリア戦略とみなされるのか?潜在的連想テストの新たな実装 --- Are questionable research practices considered a successful career strategy? A novel implementation of the implicit association test | Scientometrics | ●クログレイした方が得 |
2025-7 | 窒息寸前の科学雑誌の世界 --- Le monde des revues scientifiques au bord de l’asphyxie | lemonde | ●膨大な論文数 |
2025-7 | 出版競争、出版圧力、そして疑わしい慣行:システムの再考 --- The Race to Publish, Publication Pressures, and Questionable Practices: Rethinking the System | Information Matters | ●競争 |
2025-7 | 学術上の不正行為を特定するためのツールとしての間接フィードバック:医学生を対象とした横断的多施設共同研究 --- Indirect feedback as a tool for identifying academic misconduct: a cross-sectional multicentral study among medical students | BMC Medical Education | ●告発はネカト目撃の1割 |
2025-7 | NIHは出版料の上限設定と「科学エリート」の希薄化を計画 --- NIH Plans to Cap Publisher Fees, Dilute “Scientific Elite” | insidehighered | ●NIH |
2025-7 | 中国の研究の発展が西洋の出版界を限界に追い込む--- Guest Post - How the Growth of Chinese Research Is Bringing Western Publishing to Breaking Point | Scholarly Kitchen | ●中国の台頭 |
2025-7 | 科学におけるポスト真実 --- Post-truth in Science | TecScience | ●post-truth |
2025-7 | 科学のための賞金稼ぎ --- Bounty Hunters for Science | Federation of American Scientists | ●クリス・サイード |
2022-2 | 引用不正の仕組み --- PubPeer | PubPeer | ●引用不正 |
2025-7 | 引用不正 --- The Citation Payola | For Better Science | ●スマット・クライド:High citation recipients - Google スプレッドシート |
2025-7 | NSF CHINA Researchers etc. | Google スプレッドシート | ●ネカト者処分(中国) |
2025-7 | 中国の資金提供機関が不正行為で25人の研究者に罰金を科す --- Chinese funding agency penalizes 25 researchers for misconduct | Retraction Watch | ●ネカト者処分(中国) |
2025-7 | 研究不正行為:オーストラリアの研究公正システムの強化 --- Research misconduct: Strengthening Australia’s research integrity system | Pearls and Irritations | ●研究公正システム(豪) |
2025-6 | 過剰な生物医学研究が国民の信頼に値しない理由 --- Why too much biomedical research is often undeserving of the public’s trust | Frontiers | ●信頼 |
2025-6 | FAIRSデルファイ調査:重大な研究不正行為に対する制裁に対する態度 --- FAIRS Delphi Survey: Attitudes to sanctions for serious research misconduct | zenodo | ●Dorothy Bishop |
2025-6 | 過去40年間の生命科学論文撤回のパターンと規模を理解する --- Understanding the patterns and magnitude of life science publication Retractions in the last four decades | International Journal for Educational Integrity | ●撤回論文の分析 |
2025-6 | 正直だが容認できない研究慣行:研究が健康リスクとなるとき --- Honest yet unacceptable research practices: when research becomes a health risk | BMJ Open | ●クログレイ |
2025-6 | 研究の公正性に関する大統領令の成立は、その鈍さと防御姿勢のおかげで可能になった--- Sluggishness and defensiveness helped enable an executive order on research integrity | Science | ●学術界が不正に対処すべき |
2025-6 | スクープ:トランプ政権、科学出版大手との契約を打ち切る --- Scoop: Trump admin cuts contracts with scientific publishing giant | axios | ▽シュプリンガー・ネイチャー危機 |
2025-6 | ゲスト投稿:直接複製研究の擁護(擁護する必要があるとしても)--- Guest post: In defense of direct replication studies (if they even need defending) | Retraction Watch | ●ロスナーへの反論 |
2025-6 | 農薬、食品添加物、化学物質の安全性試験に関する業界の誤情報と欺瞞 --- The Industry Misinformation and Deception on Pesticides, Food Additives, and Chemical Safety Testing | Regeneration International | ▽安全性 |
2025-6 | AIが書いたと思われる査読を受け取ったことがありますか?--- Have you received a peer review that appeared to have been written by AI? | Dynamic Ecology | ●AI査読 |
2025-6 | 説明責任の促進:実践的なツールと知識を用いて研究機関が研究の誠実性を促進する方法 --- Fostering Accountability: How Institutions Can Promote Research Integrity with Practical Tools and Knowledge | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●C.K. Gunsalus |
2025-6 | 撤回反応 --- Retraction Reactions | American Scientist | ●ノーベル賞受賞者22名が論文撤回 |
2025-6 | 「醜い科学」と「汚い科学」は臨床科学の実践にどのような影響を与えるのか? --- How Do “Ugly Science” and “Dirty Science” Affect the Practice of Clinical Science? | International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis | ●臨床科学 |
2025-6 | ネイチャー誌のすべての研究論文に透明な査読が適用される --- Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature’s research papers | nature | ●今日から査読公開 |
2025-6 | 北朝鮮の核実験探知プロジェクト、深刻な倫理的懸念の中失敗--- North Korea's nuclear test detection project fails amid serious ethical concerns | CHOSUNBIZ | ●韓国のデタラメ |
2025-6 | NIHパブリックアクセスポリシー:著者向けQ&A --- The NIH Public Access Policy: Q&A for Authors | Authors Alliance | ●学術出版 |
2025-6 | 科学出版:もうたくさんだ --- Scientific Publishing: Enough is Enough | Human Readable | ●学術出版 |
2025-6 | NCIの所長候補と思われる人物は、論文出版後の査読を「オープンで敬意ある」ものにしたいとしながらも、探偵を「暴徒」と呼ぶ匿名サイトを宣伝している --- Apparent NCI director candidate wants ‘open, respectful’ post-publication peer review while promoting anonymous site that calls sleuths a ‘mob’ | Retraction Watch | ●ワフィク・エル・デイリー |
2025-6 | 著作権販売:ネイチャー誌が製紙工場の仕組みを調査 --- Authorship for sale: Nature investigates how paper mills work | nature | ●論文売買 |
2025-6 | あなたの科学が攻撃されたとき、どう対処しますか? --- When your science is attacked, how do you cope? | cen | ●攻撃 |
2025-6 | 「誠実性指数」は撤回率の高い大学を分類 --- ‘Integrity index’ flags universities with high retraction rates | nature | ●研究公正指数 |
2025-6 | 著作権と盗作が芸術と芸術家にとって何を意味するのか --- What copyright, plagiarism mean for art and artists | print | ◎芸術 |
2025-6 | リトラクション・ウォッチの親組織への90万ドルの助成金は、人体の健康に影響を与える物質の法医学的分析に充てられます --- $900,000 grant to Retraction Watch’s parent organization will fund forensic analysis of articles that affect human health | Retraction Watch | ◎ジェームズ・ヘザーズ |
2025-6 | オープンサイエンスの誠実性ガイド集 Wiki --- Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides Wiki | OSF | ●ネカトハンティング術 |
2025-6 | 「誰でもできる」:探偵たちが出版後レビューのためのツールキットを公開--- ‘Anyone can do this’: Sleuths publish a toolkit for post-publication review | Retraction Watch | ●ネカトハンティング術 |
2025-6 | ゲスト投稿:NIH資金による複製研究は、前臨床研究における再現性危機の解決策にはならない --- Guest post: NIH-funded replication studies are not the answer to the reproducibility crisis in pre-clinical research | Retraction Watch | ●マイク・ロスナー |
2025-5 | 研究ガバナンスにおける科学雑誌の役割と責任:ネイチャーとシュプリンガー・ネイチャーにおける編集方針策定(1995~2023年) --- The Roles and Responsibilities of Scientific Journals in Research Governance: Editorial Policymaking at Nature and Springer Nature (1995–2023) | CRISPR Journal | ●学術誌の編集 |
2025-5 | 学術研究の公正性に関する調査は独立性、公正性、そして迅速性をもって行われなければならない --- Academic Research Integrity Investigations Must be Independent, Fair, and Timely | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●Matthew Schrag マシュー・シュラグ, Kevin Patrick ケビン・パトリック, Elisabeth Bik エリザベス・ビック
|
2025-5 | ホワイトハウスの健康報告書に偽の引用文が含まれていた --- White House Health Report Included Fake Citations | ニューヨーク・タイムズ | ◎ホワイトハウス。日本語報道
|
2025-5 | 2023-2024年度の英国の研究機関による研究不正行為に関する年次報告書の非匿名レビュー。研究不正に焦点を当てている。 --- A non-anonymised review of annual statements on research misconduct from UK institutions in 2023-4, with a focus on research fraud | zenodo | ●ドロシー ・ビショップ
|
2025-5 | 私が営利出版社への論文投稿をやめた理由 --- Why I stopped submitting my work to for-profit publishers | Physics World | ●営利出版 |
2025-5 | 科学的手法と研究結果がいかにして攻撃を受けたか --- How the scientific method and findings came under siege | Deseret News | ●研究 |
2025-5 | ペルーの出版物の闇市場:論文工場と売買される著者--- The Black Market of Publications in Peru: Paper Mills and Authorship for Sale | Learned Publishing | ◎ペルーの論文工場 |
2025-5 | 「私たちは、人間に説得されているのか、プログラムに説得されているのか分からない」--- ‘We can’t tell if we’re being persuaded by a person or a program’ | Pursuit | ●AIボット |
2025-5 | クラリベイトが学術出版における悪質な行為者を取り締まる方法--- How Clarivate is clamping down on bad actors in academic publishing | Chemistry World | ●インパクトファクター付与 |
2025-5 | 指標操作? 文献計量学の異常と世界大学ランキングにおける信頼性の危機 --- Gaming the Metrics? Bibliometric Anomalies and the Integrity Crisis in Global University Rankings | bioRxiv | ●大学ランキング |
2025-5 | NatureのAI研究テストを受けてみよう:あなたの倫理観を比較してみよう --- Take Nature’s AI research test: find out how your ethics compare | nature | ●AI研究テスト |
2025-5 | 画期的な科学的発見は見つけにくくなってきていますか? --- Are groundbreaking science discoveries becoming harder to find? | nature | ●科学の終焉 |
2025-5 | 科学には必ず悪い面がある ― そして想像以上に多い--- There’s Always Bad Science — and More than You Might Think | Medium | ●ネカト |
2025-5 | 研究不正行為規制に関する最終規則:施行が迫る中、研究機関が知っておくべきこと --- The Final Rule on Research Misconduct Regulations: What Institutions Need to Know as Implementation Looms | Epstein Becker Green | ◎ORI新規則 |
2025-5 | 医師団がアリゾナ州立大学の研究不正行為を調査するよう国立衛生研究所に要請 --- Doctors Group Asks National Institutes of Health to Investigate Arizona State University for Research Misconduct | Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine | ◎動物実験 |
2025-5 | 著者、査読者、編集者のためのより優れたIDシステムは不正行為を減少させることができるか?STMはそう考えている --- Can a better ID system for authors, reviewers and editors reduce fraud? STM thinks so | Retraction Watch | ●身元保証 |
2025-5 | 高被引用研究者リストの信頼性は低下しているのか? --- Is the list of Highly Cited Researchers losing credibility? | Impact of Social Sciences | ●高被引用論文 |
2025-5 | 科学には倫理的な監視が必要であり、連邦政府の資金がなければ社会の健康と安全が危険にさらされる --- Science requires ethical oversight – without federal dollars, society’s health and safety are at risk | conversation | ●監視 |
2025-5 | 「出版するか消滅するか」から「目立つか消えるか」へ:次は何? --- From ‘publish or perish’ to ‘be visible or vanish’: What’s next? | Malay Mail | ●目立つか消えるか |
2025-5 | トランプ政権、オバーリン大学の研究者への9万ドルの助成金を中止 --- Trump Administration Cancels $90K Grant to Oberlin Researchersw | Oberlin Revie | ●倫理教育カット |
2025-5 | 編集者の皆様、出版の遅れは私たちのキャリアにダメージを与えています --- Dear editors, your publication delays are damaging our careers | nature | 〇出版怠慢、日本 |
2025-5 | 論文撤回は研究者のキャリアパスや共同研究にどのような影響を与えるのか? --- How do retractions impact researchers’ career paths and collaborations? | Retraction Watch | ●論文撤回とキャリアパス |
2025-5 | 信頼できる研究者に誤って帰属された不正研究 ― ジャーナルにとって新たな課題か? - --- Fraudulent Research Falsely Attributed to Credible Researchers—An Emerging Challenge for Journals? | Learned Publishing | ●新ネカト? |
2025-5 | アジアの策略と研究不正行為:東洋主義と西洋主義から監査文化への連帯まで --- Full article: Asian Tricks and Research Misconduct: From Orientalism and Occidentalism to Solidarity against Audit Cultures | East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal | ●アジアのネカト |
2025-5 | Pハッキング — あなたに起こりうる5つのケース --- P hacking — Five ways it could happen to you | nature | ●Pハッキング |
2025-5 | ドイツは学校でのいじめ問題を抑制できるのか? --- Can Germany rein in its academic bullying problem? | nature | ◎ドイツのアカハラ |
2025-5 | 「今は勢いを失っている時ではない」:Retraction Watchが科学編集者評議会の最高栄誉賞を受賞 --- ‘Now is not the time to fade’: Retraction Watch awarded Council of Science Editors’ highest honor | Retraction Watch | ◎受賞 |
2025-5 | 「愚かなミス」:EPA研究者が未成年の子供を論文の著者に加える --- A ‘stupid mistake’: EPA researcher added their underage child as an author on manuscript → Management Implication Report: Office of Research and Development Scientific Integrity and Ethics Concerns | Retraction Watch | ◎EPA |
2025-5 | 研究の誠実さは、驚くほど多くの悲しげで、クラクションを鳴らし、無能なピエロを次々と排出するピエロカーである --- Research Integrity Is A Clown Car Which Continually Spills Forth A Truly Surprising Quantity Of Sad, Honking, Incompetent Clowns | jamesclaims | ●James Heathers |
2025-5 | 論文工場の博士号? --- A Ph.D. in paper mills? | Retraction Watch | ●論文工場 |
2025-4 | デジタル社会における知的完全性の侵食:生成AIの悪用が盗作よりも悪質な理由--- The digital erosion of intellectual integrity: why misuse of generative AI is worse than plagiarism | AI & SOCIETY | ●AI |
2025-4 | 研究の誠実さの人間的側面 --- The human side of research integrity | Research Information | ●研究公正 |
2025-4 | ブルッキー・ベイクハウスは、RecipeTin Eatsの創設者から盗作の疑いで告発されました。しかし、レシピを自分のものにすることはできるのでしょうか? --- Brooki Bakehouse has been accused of plagiarising by RecipeTin Eats founder. But can you own a recipe? | ABC News | 〇レシピの盗用・違法 |
2025-4 | 2015年から2023年までの8年間の研究公正性に関する実証研究:スコープレビュー --- From 2015 to 2023, eight years of empirical research on research integrity: a scoping review | Research Integrity and Peer Review | ●研究公正レビュー |
2025-4 | 研究不正行為報告における透明性の正当な限界 --- The justified limits of transparency in research misconduct reports | Accountability in Research | ●報告書 |
2025-4 | How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards | | ●C.K. Gunsalus |
2025-4 | 研究不正行為に起因する名誉毀損訴訟:機関におけるベストプラクティス--- Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●訴訟 |
2025-4 | ScienceGuardians、PubPeerに不満を持つ著者が苦情を申し立てる場 --- ScienceGuardians, where disgruntled authors complain about PubPeer | Science Integrity Digest | ●bik |
2025-4 | 学術論文の撤回はどのような場合に検閲の一形態となるのでしょうか? --- When Do Scholarly Retractions Become a Form of Censorship? | quillette | ●Ivan Oransky |
2025-4 | 大規模な再現性プロジェクトは数十の生物医学研究の検証に失敗した --- Huge reproducibility project fails to validate dozens of biomedical studies | nature | ●再現性 |
2025-4 | 倫理基準の強化は論文撤回の流れを変える可能性がある --- Stronger ethical standards can turn the tide on retractions | universityworldnews | ●倫理基準 |
2025-4 | 科学捜査官がAIを使っているにもかかわらずそれを公表していない論文数百件を指摘 --- Science sleuths flag hundreds of papers that use AI without disclosing it | omniletters | ●AI |
2025-4 | 研究不正行為機関は「学術機関の自主統治」を損なうと研究が指摘 --- Research misconduct agency would undermine “academic self-governance,” study says | CMAJ | ●国家監視機関不要説 |
2025-4 | FAIRS:科学における誠実性改革への挫折した試み --- FAIRS: Frustrating Attempts at Integrity Reform in Science | For Better Science | ●会議報告 |
2025-4 | 学術的評判の操作のための知的財産制度の悪用 --- Exploitation of intellectual property systems for the manipulation of academic reputations | International Journal for Educational Integrity | ●特許工場 |
2025-4 | ランキング重視のシステムの中で、大学は一体何を競っているのか? --- In a Ranking-Obsessed System, What Exactly Are Universities Competing For? | Wire | 〇大学ランキング |
2025-4 | 独占:21世紀で最も引用された論文 --- Exclusive: the most-cited papers of the twenty-first century | nature | 〇引用 |
2025-4 | 科学の黄金時代:今日でも頻繁に引用される数十年前の研究論文 --- Science’s golden oldies: the decades-old research papers still heavily cited today | nature | 〇引用 |
2025-4 | これらは史上最も引用された研究論文です --- These are the most-cited research papers of all time | nature | 〇引用 |
2025-4 | ステルスジャーナル買収の兆候:疑わしい出版社買収を検出するための計量書誌学的アプローチ --- Tell-tale signs of stealth journal takeovers: A bibliometric approach to detecting questionable publisher acquisitions | zenodo | ●ジャーナルスナッチャー |
2025-4 | 「ジャーナルスナッチャー」の侵略:科学出版物を購入し、不正行為を行う企業 --- Invasion of the ‘journal snatchers’: the firms that buy science publications and turn them rogue | nature | ●ジャーナルスナッチャー |
2025-4 | 大学が不正行為報告書を公開すべき理由 --- Why Universities Should Make Misconduct Reports Public | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●大学の透明性。解説済(7-171) |
2025-4 | わずか10万ドルあれば、自閉症の原因を瞬時に突き止めることができる。これは年間5000億ドル規模の問題だ。 --- For just $100K, we could instantly know what causes autism. It’s a $500 billion/yr problem. | SGT Report | 〇自閉症ワクチン説 |
2025-4 | 研究の公正性に対する脅威は「世界的かつ体系的な問題」--- Threats to research integrity ‘a global, systemic problem’ | Research Professional News | 〇研究公正 |
2025-4 | UKRIの研究データポリシーの策定 - 英国研究イノベーション機構 --- Developing UKRI's research data policy - UK Research and Innovation | Citizen Space | ●UKRIの規則改訂開始 |
2025-4 | 30 以上の項目がここにあります: 気候詐欺が崩壊しつつある証拠 --- Over 30 items here: Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing | Watts Up With That? | ●気候詐欺 |
2025-4 | 研究における不正行為はどの程度許容されるべきか?--- How much misconduct should there be in research? | BPS | ●ネカト発生率 |
2025-4 | 研究における不正行為が増加 --- Misconduct in research on the rise | UOC | ●ネカト以外の台頭 |
2025-4 | ピーナッツアレルギーの流行は、誤った科学と組織の傲慢さによってどのように促進されたのか --- How the peanut allergy epidemic was fueled by faulty science and institutional arrogance | NaturalNews.com | ●ピーナッツアレルギー |
2025-3 | 不正行為の検出 — 15 年間の科学的画像調査から得られた方法と教訓の進化 --- Misconduct Detection — Evolving Methods & Lessons from 15 Years of Scientific Image Sleuthing | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●Paul S. Brookes |
2025-3 | 早期警告ジャーナルリスト --- Early Warning Journal List | | 〇中国 |
2025-3 | 欠陥のある医学研究が医師のアドバイスに反映される可能性がある。私たちはそれを阻止するツールを開発した --- Flawed medical studies can end up in doctors’ advice. We developed a tool to stop it | conversation | ●ネカト影響阻止 |
2025-3 | 国家調査における研究倫理と誠実性のリーダーシップの現れ - エストニア、フィンランド、ノルウェー、フランス、オランダの事例 --- Manifestations of research ethics and integrity leadership in national surveys – cases of Estonia, Finland, Norway, France and the Netherlands | Accountability in Research | ●ネカト未報告 |
2025-3 | 出版社が査読者への報酬支払いを試行 — 何がわかったのか? --- Publishers trial paying peer reviewers — what did they find? | nature | ●有償査読 |
2025-3 | [2503.21267] 論文工場の問題を解決するには、将来の汚染を防ぎ、過去の汚染を浄化する必要がある - ジャーナル「バイオエンジニアリング」の事例 --- [2503.21267] Tackling paper mills requires us to prevent future contamination and clean up the past -- the case of the journal Bioengineered | arxiv | ●論文工場 |
2025-3 | データの妥当性の評価をより複雑な不正行為の問題から分離する --- Segregate Assessment of Data Validity from the More Complex Issue of Fraud | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●データの妥当性 |
2025-3 | 取り組みを見せてください:「オープンサイエンス」運動が科学的不正行為にどう取り組むか --- Show your working: how the ‘open science’ movement tackles scientific misconduct | conversation | ●オープンサイエンス |
2025-3 | 学術出版は数十億ドル規模の産業である。科学にとって必ずしも良いことではない --- Academic publishing is a multibillion-dollar industry. It’s not always good for science | conversation | ●学術出版 |
2025-3 | 査読は科学上の不正行為を防ぐためのものである。しかし、査読自体にも問題がある。 --- Peer review is meant to prevent scientific misconduct. But it has its own problems | conversation | ●査読 |
2025-3 | 化学ジャーナルは自己盗用論文の撤回に3年弱かかる --- Chemistry journals take just under 3 years to retract papers with self-plagiarism | cen | ●撤回に3年 |
2025-3 | 社会科学における不正行為を減らす方法に関する内部者の視点--- An Insider’s Perspective on How to Reduce Fraud in the Social Sciences | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | ●社会科学 |
2025-3 | トランプ政権はさらなる研究の再現を望んでいる。それは容易なことではないだろう --- The Trump administration wants more studies replicated. That won't be easy | axios | 〇トランプ政権 |
2025-3 | 科学者が誤りを訂正しないと、誤報や致命的な結果を招く可能性がある --- When Scientists Don’t Correct Errors, Misinformation and Deadly Consequences Can Follow | Scientific American | ●科学の間違い |
2025-3 | 医療不正行為におけるジャーナルの役割 --- The role of journals in medical misconduct | medicalxpress | ●学術誌 |
2025-3 | 研究不正:内部調査を遅らせ「外部からの監視を避ける」 --- Research fraud: go-slow internal probes ‘avoid external scrutiny’ | timeshighereducation | ●大学調査不正 |
2025-3 | 偽の科学論文と不正な学術研究の証拠となるデータ --- Telltale Data Signs of Bogus Scientific Papers and Fraudulent Academic Research | Global Investigative Journalism Network | ●学術汚染 |
2025-3 | 発覚:ドイツのトップ科学機関での虐待 --- Uncovered: Abuse at top German science institution | DW | ●アカハラ |
2025-3 | 査読は科学上の不正行為を防ぐためのものである。しかし、査読自体にも問題がある。 --- Peer review is meant to prevent scientific misconduct. But it has its own problems | conversation | ●査読 |
2025-3 | DOGE がアメリカの生物医学研究の黄金時代を終わらせる --- DOGE ends America’s golden age of biomedical research | Vindicator | ◎米国医学の凋落 |
2025-3 | なぜ約 45,000 件の学術論文が自らを引用するのか?--- Why do nearly 45,000 scholarly papers cite themselves? | Retraction Watch | ◎自己引用 |
2025-3 | UCL、バーシャル教授によるもう一つの偽造論文の撤回要求を拒否--- UCL rebuffs calls to retract another falsified paper by Prof Birchall | Dr Peter Wilmshurst | ◎マッキアリーニ事件 |
2025-3 | The Fake Genius Full Movie || The Illusion of Genius English full movie watch free The Genius Scam | YouTube | 〇ニセ天才 |
2025-3 | 科学上の不正行為が増加しています。しかし、それは正確には何でしょうか? --- Scientific misconduct is on the rise. But what exactly is it? | conversation | 〇オーストラリア |
2025-3 | 研究詐欺の実態を描く --- Painting a picture of research fraud | AusHSI | 〇研究詐欺 |
2025-3 | 昨年、シリアのトップ化学者が殺害された。問題は、彼が存在しなかったことだ --- Last year a top Syrian chemist was murdered. The problem is he never existed | Chemistry World | ◎フェイク |
2025-3 | 無償査読が科学雑誌に対する反トラスト訴訟を激化 --- Unpaid peer review fuels antitrust lawsuit against scientific journals | STAT | ◎査読有償 |
2025-3 | バングラデシュの博士課程の現状--- The PhD landscape in Bangladesh: A reality check | Business Standard | ◎バングラデシュ |
2025-3 | ゲスト投稿: ジンバルドーのスタンフォード監獄実験は撤回されるべきか? --- Guest post: Should Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment be retracted? | Retraction Watch | ◎スタンフォード監獄実験 |
2025-3 | 詐欺的な実験室 --- The Fraudulent Laboratory | lawliberty | ◎Theodore Dalrymple |
2025-3 | 自己盗用: 科学分野におけるその蔓延とパターンに関する回顧的研究 --- Full article: Self-plagiarism: A retrospective study of its prevalence and patterns across scientific disciplines | Accountability in Research | ◎自己盗用 |
2025-2 | 論文を超えて、REF と研究文化の向上を目指す --- Look beyond papers for a better REF and research culture | Research Professional News | ◎論文以外で評価 |
2025-2 | 社会科学は壊れている。これを修復する方法はこれだ。 --- Social Science Is Broken. Here’s How to Fix It. | chronicle | ◎Andrew Gelman |
2025-3 | 医学研究の完全性を脅かす政治的行動に伴うダメージコントロール --- Damage Control in the Wake of Political Action That Threatens the Integrity of Medical Research | Annals of Internal Medicine | 〇トランプ対応 |
2025-3 | 「パテントミルズ」科学者の販売奇妙な医療機器の発明者 --- ‘Patent mills’ sell scientists inventorship of bizarre medical devices | Science | AAAS | ●特許工場 |
2025-2 | 学問の評判の操作のための知的財産システムの搾取 --- Exploitation of intellectual property systems for the manipulation of academic reputations | Zenodo | ●特許工場 |
2025-3 | 性的不正行為の申し立て後、学術論文の引用数が減少、研究詐欺によるものではない --- Fewer citations for academics after sex misconduct claims, not research fraud | timeshighereducatio | ●不正者論文の引用 |
2025-3 | 不正行為で告発された学者の引用が減少 --- Citations Drop for Scholars Accused of Misconduct | Mirage News | ●不正者論文の引用 |
2025-3 | 性的不正行為で告発された科学者、科学的不正行為された科学者、の引用 --- Citations drop after scientists accused of sexual, but not scientific, misconduct | Science | AAAS | ●不正者論文の引用 |
2025-3 | 資金面での混乱の中、一部の神経科学者は結集を計画--- Amid funding confusion, some neuroscientists plan to rally | Transmitter | 〇Stand Up for Science |
2025-3 | 中国の最高裁判所が製紙工場の取り締まりを要求 --- China’s supreme court calls for crack down on paper mills | nature | ◎中国・取り締まり。日本語訳 |
2025-3 | トランプ大統領はタイトル IX を修正中。修正は恒久的なものか? --- Trump Is Correcting Title IX. Are His Fixes Permanent? | Minding The Campus | ◎性不正規則 |
2025-3 | 史上最大の科学的詐欺 — パート XXXIII--- The Greatest Scientific Fraud of All Time — Part XXXIII | Watts Up With That? | ◎気候変動は詐欺 |
2025-2 | 神経科学に関する最後の二人の著者による論文? --- The last two-author neuroscience paper? | Transmitter | ◎著者在順 |
2025-2 | IEEE には疑似科学の問題がある --- IEEE Has a Pseudoscience Problem | BishopBlog | 〇IEEE |
2025-2 | 生物医学科学における略奪的ジャーナルを評価する研究の概要 --- An overview of studies assessing predatory journals within the biomedical sciences | Accountability in Research | ●捕食学術誌 |
2025-2 | 研究不正行為の疑惑への対応方法の改善を目的とした教員研修の成果 --- Full article: Outcomes of faculty training aimed at improving how allegations of research misconduct are handled | Accountability in Research | ●ネカト研修 |
2025-2 | テラノスのスキャンダルでwhiを吹くことがエリカチョンのキャリアをどのように変えたか --- How blowing the whistle on the Theranos scandal transformed Erika Cheung’s career | nature | ●告発者 |
2025-2 | 画期的なリッチアプリは、研究の不正行為とその財政的影響に取り組む --- Groundbreaking RICH App Tackles Research Misconduct and Its Financial Impact | BusinessMole | ●ネカト防止 |
2025-2 | 研究の不正行為を防ぎ、知的財産を保護するために導入されたリッチアプリ--- RICH App Introduced To Prevent Research Misconduct And Protect Intellectual Property | Business Manchester | ●ネカト防止 |
2025-2 | 研究の不正行為は止められないようになっていますか? --- Is research misconduct becoming unstoppable? | ijme | ●ネカト |
2025-2 | イタリアの研究の完全性を強化する:ローマの画期的なコミットメント --- Strengthening research integrity in Italy: a landmark commitment in Rome | frontiers | ●ローマ宣言 |
2025-2 | アカデミック出版物は完全に壊れていますAcademic Publication is Utterly Broken | | |
2025-2 | 私はあなたに法医学的メタエッセンスに関する本を書きました --- I Have Written You A Book On Forensic Metascience | jamesclaims | ●James Heathers |
2025-2 | 引用ミルとプリプリントサーバーを介した引用操作 --- Citation manipulation through citation mills and pre-print servers | Scientific Reports | ●引用工場 |
2025-2 | 学問の評判の操作のための知的財産システムの搾取 --- Exploitation of intellectual property systems for the manipulation of academic reputations | zenodo | ●特許工場 |
2025-2 | 「パテントミルズ」科学者の販売奇妙な医療機器の発明者 --- ‘Patent mills’ sell scientists inventorship of bizarre medical devices | Science | AAAS | ●特許工場 |
2025-2 | 最後の手段の規律 --- The Discipline of Last Resort | inquisitive | ◎Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus |
2025-2 | どの大学が最も科学論文を撤回していますか? --- Which universities have the most science papers retracted? | Mind Matters | 〇どの大学 |
2025-2 | 撤回データが科学をクリーンアップするための強力なツールになる理由 --- Why retractions data could be a powerful tool for cleaning up science | nature | ●クリーンアップ |
2025-2 | これらの大学には、最も撤回された科学記事があります --- : These universities have the most retracted scientific articles | nature | ●どの大学 |
2025-2 | 革新的なアプリリッチは、研究の不正行為とその費用のかかる結果を防ぎます --- Revolutionary App RICH Prevents Research Misconduct and Its Costly Consequences | Markets Insider | ●ネカト防止方法 |
2025-2 | ネカトハンターが出版社に雇われるとき:ニックワイズとのQ&A --- When a sleuth gets hired by a publisher: A Q&A with Nick Wise | Retraction Watch | ●ニック・ワイズ |
2025-2 | 新しい本は、Claudine Gay Harvard Plagiarismスキャンダルの詳細を公開しています--- New book exposes details on Claudine Gay Harvard plagiarism scandal | College Fix | ●書籍:ゲイの盗用 |
2025-2 | 学問の完全性を強化するためのリーダーシップの呼びかけ --- A call for leadership in strengthening academic integrity | stanforddaily | ●スタンフォード大学 |
2025-2 | アンナ大学は、研究の不規則性を抑制する罰則を課しています --- Anna University imposes penalties to curb irregularities in research | dtnext | ●罰則、インド |
2025-2 | トランプ政権は科学を標的にしています。科学公正法は、それを保護するのに役立ちます--- The Trump Administration Is Targeting Science. The Scientific Integrity Act Could Help Protect It | Union of Concerned Scientists | ●科学公正法 |
2025-2 | すべての「捕食誌」が同じではありません:疑わしいジャーナルのスペクトルを探る --- Not All ‘Predators’ Are the Same: Exploring the Spectrum of Questionable Journals | SocArXiv | ●捕食学術誌 |
2025-2 | 「真実を追求する士気を失い、麻痺する科学者」:Ivan OranskyとのQ&A --- “Demoralizing and Paralyzing Scientists Pursuing the Truth”: Q&A with Ivan Oransky | Heterodox Academy | ◎Ivan Oransky |
2025-2 | ICYMI:Science Editorは、整合性の質問への取り組みを公に奨励しています--- ICYMI: Science editor encourages addressing integrity questions publicly | Retraction Watch | ◎Holden Thorp ホールデンソープ |
2025-2 | 沈黙を破る --- Breaking the silence | Science | ◎Holden Thorp ホールデンソープ |
2025-2 | The Extortionists, by M. Angeles Oviedo-Garcia | For Better Science | ●引用強制 |
2025-2 | 科学機関には、予測的な服従の長い歴史があります|意見 --- Scientific institutions have a long history of anticipatory obedience | Opinion | Chemistry World | ◎服従 |
2025-2 | 20,000人の科学者が非現実的な料金で公開すると、研究は述べています --- 20,000 scientists publish at unrealistic rates, study says | cen | ●多数論文出版者 |
2025-2 | 科学の変色したイメージに対処 --- Addressing the tarnished image of science | Research Information | ●研究公正 |
2025-2 | 研究の完全性をサポートするためのコンコルダットのコンプライアンスに関するDWP年次声明、2024年から2025年 --- DWP annual statement on compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, 2024 to 2025 | GOV.UK | ●英国政府:研究公正 |
2025-2 | 生成AIがどのように変化して引用を変えているか:あなたが知る必要があること --- How GenAI is Transforming Citation: What You Need To Know | Education Today | ●生成AI |
2025-2 | 非公開の紛争、稲妻のピアレビュー:麻薬の失敗における1つのアルツハイマー病のジャーナルの役割 --- Undisclosed conflicts, lightning-fast peer review: One Alzheimer’s journal’s role in a failed drug | Retraction Watch | ●書籍:Charles Piller |
2025-1 | 高度に引用された研究者:リストの解剖学|定量的科学研究 --- Highly Cited Researchers: anatomy of a list | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press | ●高被引用者 |
2025-1 | 撤退の大物は、科学が危機にinしていることを意味しますか?しそうにない --- Does the glut of retractions mean science is in crisis? Hardly | timeshighereducation | ●ドロシー・ビショップ |
2025-1 | 英国の大邸宅から運営されている怪しげなビジネスは、平凡な研究を出版することで数百万を稼ぐために科学雑誌を買収しています --- A shady business operated out of a British mansion is buying up scientific journals to earn millions by publishing mediocre studies | EL PAÍS English | ●論文工場 |
2025-1 | 「衝撃的な」決定において、日本は2つの有効性試験で失敗したMPOX薬を承認します --- In a ‘shocker’ decision, Japan approves mpox drug that failed in two efficacy trials | Science | AAAS | ●日本の異常 イ |
2025-1 | 現代の研究における不正の台頭 --- The rise of dishonesty in modern research | People Daily | ●不正の台頭 |
2025-1 | 研究詐欺への対処 --- Addressing Research Fraud | Good Science Project | ●ネカト対処 |
2025-1 | 学術出版におけるインセンティブの不整合とジャーナル改革への影響 --- The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform | PNAS | ◎学術出版 |
2025-1 | なぜピアレビューが科学の新世界で時代遅れになっているのか --- Why Peer Review is Outdated in the New World of Science | newfireenergy | ●査読 |
2025-1 | 科学的不正行為の調査は困難です。特に、スーパーバイザーが著者である場合 --- Investigating scientific misconduct is hard—especially when your supervisor is an author | Science | AAAS | ●ネカト告発 |
2025-1 | 偽の論文は、世界の科学文献を汚染し、腐敗した産業を促進し、合法的な救命医学研究を遅くしています --- Fake papers are contaminating the world’s scientific literature, fueling a corrupt industry and slowing legitimate lifesaving medical research | conversation | ●偽の論文:Frederik Joelving |
2025-1 | わー: 「医学雑誌」とヘッドハンターが私を欲しがっている!? --- うWow: ”medical journals” & headhunters want me?!? | Gary Schwitzer | ◎面白い |
2025-1 | 世俗的な成功を達成できるジャンク科学への7つのステップ --- 7 steps to junk science that can achieve worldly success | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science | ◎ジャンク科学 |
2025-1 | イノベーションのゆっくりとしたキャンセル:現代の資金調達の批判的な見方 --- The Slow Cancellation of Innovation: A critical look at modern funding | Good Science Project | ◎研究界の老化 |
2025-2 | 不正加工|アルツハイマー病の治療における詐欺、傲慢、そして悲劇 --- Doctored | Book by Charles Piller | Simon & Schuster | ◎チャールズ・ピラー著の本 |
2025-1 | 意見 |アルツハイマー病研究における不正の長い影 --- Opinion | The Long Shadow of Fraud in Alzheimer’s Research | New York Times | ◎チャールズ・ピラー著 |
2025-1 | 破滅への研究: 悪化する学術詐欺の恐怖 --- Research to Ruin: The Worsening Spectre of Academic Fraud | C2C Journal | ◎カナダ |
2025-1 | 一部の研究者はデータを「ドーピング」 – 2024 年の不正行為スキャンダルを振り返る --- Some researchers 'dope' their data – A look back at the cheating scandals of 2024 | sciencenorway | ●2024年 |
2025-1 | 黒いプラスチックやその他の研究が修正または撤回された後も「ゾンビの事実」は生き続ける--- 'Zombie facts' live on after black plastic and other studies get corrected or retracted | CBC News | ●オランスキー |
2025-1 | 研究不正行為の地理的格差: 国別の撤回パターンの分析 --- Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing Retraction Patterns by Country | Journal of Medical Internet Research | ●日本は撤回率6位 |
2025-1 | 2022年から2024年までの国ごとの景気後退分析。出版物の増加により撤回率が上昇。 --- Country-wise Retraction Analysis from 2022-2024. Increased Publishing Leading to Higher Retraction Rates. | zenodo | ●日本は撤回率16位 |
2025-1 | 「研究者には出版する責任がある」 --- ‘Researchers have a responsibility to publish’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎研究者 |
2025-1 | データ探偵の仕事は報われません。撤回のクレジットを取得する必要があります --- Data sleuths’ work is thankless. They must get credit for retractions | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎ハンター |
2025-1 | 科学研究不正行為者には厳しい罰則が待っている --- Harsh penalties await scientific research fraudsters | Court | ●中国の厳罰化 |
2025-1 | 研究者が言う出版指標の指標が優れている14の大学 --- The 14 universities with publication metrics researchers say are too good to be true | Retraction Watch | ●ランク不正 |
2025-1 | ビブリオメトリクスを使用して、疑わしい著者名と所属に関する慣行と、それらが世界的な研究指標に及ぼす影響を検出する: 14 大学のケーススタディ --- Using bibliometrics to detect questionable authorship and affiliation practices and their impact on global research metrics: A case study of 14 universities | MIT Press | ●ランク不正 |
2025-1 | 科学研究の不正行為を告発し内部告発者が20万ドルを受け取る --- Whistleblower Receives $200K After Alleging Scientific Research Misconduct | whistleblowersblog | ●20万ドル。解説済(7-167) |
2025-1 | なぜEVの完全輸送は詐欺であり不可能なのか --- Why Total EV transport is a Fraud and Impossible | Sri Lanka Guardian | ●アンチ温暖化 |
2025-1 | 大学「落ちこぼれの学者がオンライン虐待の標的に」 --- Universities ‘failing academics targeted by online abuse’ | timeshighereducation | ●オンライン虐待 |
2025-1 | 被引用数の多い「早熟」な若手科学者が急増 --- ‘Precocious’ early-career scientists with high citation counts proliferate | nature | ●出版不正 |
2024-10 | 早熟な引用の特徴とシグナルが影響を与える: メタリサーチ研究 --- Features and signals in precocious citation impact: a meta-research study | bioRxiv | ●出版不正:John P.A. Ioannidis |
2025-1 | (3) 学術不正は阻止できるのか? --- (3) Can Academic Fraud Be Stopped? | LinkedIn | ●学術不正:オランスキー |
2024-12 | 原子のように薄いサラミのスライスに最近遭遇した --- Recent encounters with atom-thin salami slicing | Reese Richardson | ●サラミ出版 |
2024-12 | 論文撤回のブラックボックスを開く: データ管理エラーの原因と結果を探る --- Opening the black box of article retractions: exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors | Royal Society Open Science | ●撤回 |
2024-12 | ジャーナルの撤回は科学が機能することを証明する - 兵器化されるまで --- Journal retractions prove science works – until they are weaponized | STAT | ●撤回 |
2024-12 | テニュアトラック教員は、大学院に行った両親を持つ可能性が高い - この傾向は 50 年間変わっていない --- Tenure-track faculty are likely to have parents who went to grad school — a trend that hasn’t changed for 50 years | Higher Ed Dive | ●世襲学者 |
2024-12 | 科学的詐欺と隠蔽を暴く – CDC 資金提供による最近の研究の事例 --- Exposing Scientific Fraud and Cover-up – the Case of a Recent CDC-Funded Study | siguna | ●詐欺と隠蔽 |
2024-12 | リトラクション・ウォッチ --- Retraction Watch | Adventist Review | ●撤回監視 |
2024-12 | 「自信を持って本当に間違っている」: 方法論的に矛盾した査読フィードバックに対する質的研究者の経験 --- “Being Really Confidently Wrong”: Qualitative Researchers’ Experiences of Methodologically Incongruent Peer Review Feedback | psycnet.apa | ●査読 |
2024-12 | MetaArXiv プレプリント |研究公正をテーマとした学術小説 --- MetaArXiv Preprints | Academic novels on research integrity Academic novels | osf | ●小説 |
2024-12 | 科学者であることについて 責任ある倫理的な研究行為に関する最新のオンライン ガイド--- On Being a Scientist An Updated and Online Guide to the Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research | National Academies | ●改訂版 |
2024-12 | フィンランド出版フォーラム、数百のFrontiersとMDPIジャーナルを格下げへ --- Finland Publication Forum will downgrade hundreds of Frontiers and MDPI journals | Retraction Watch | ●FrontiersとMDPI |
2024-12 | 犯罪は報われる --- Crime pays | Tol Tales | ●論文工場から年25万ドル |
2024-12 | The 100% CI | 100.ci | ●まんが |
2024-12 | 学術出版に信頼信用機関は必要ですか? --- Do we need a trust credit agency in scholarly publishing? | world.hey | ●信用機関 |
2024-12 | 検出か欺瞞: 研究不正行為における AI の諸刃の剣 --- Detection or Deception: The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Research Misconduct | Scientist | ●人工知能 |
2024-12 | 人工知能時代における研究不正行為の検出 --- Detecting Research Misconduct in the Age of Artificial Intelligence | Scientist | ●人工知能 |
2024-12 | 研究が秘密である場合に科学を一般の人々と共有する方法 --- How to share science with the public when your research is secret | Science | AAAS | ●部外秘 |
2024-12 | 米国の科学助成機関が雑誌論文への無料アクセスに関するポリシーを展開 --- U.S. science funding agencies roll out policies on free access to journal articles | Science | AAAS | ●無料アクセス。日本語訳(crisp_bio) |
2024-12 | ゲスト投稿 - 中国の科学技術ジャーナルの優秀性行動計画の評価: 研究への影響と基準の新時代?--- Guest Post - Evaluating China’s Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan: A New Era of Research Impact and Standards? | Scholarly Kitchen | ●中国の学術誌改革 |
2024-12 | 非科学的な社会科学は偽りのふりをして取引されている --- Unscientific social science is trading under false pretences | timeshighereducation | ◎社会科学 |
2024-12 | 見せかけの感覚 --- A sense of sham | New Zealand Geographic | ◎スマット・クライド |
2024-12 | モンキーロンダリングの汚いビジネスを観る ---Watch The Dirty Business of Monkey Laundering | Bloomberg | ◎実験動物 |
2024-12 | 粗末なコメント、つまりより大きな影響力を与える数字への近道で汚い手段が増加している--- Shoddy commentaries—a quick and dirty route to higher impact numbers—are on the rise | Science | AAAS | ●コメント論文の氾濫 |
2024-12 | 「研究の公正性を維持する取り組みへの汚名を着せろ」 --- ‘Destigmatise efforts to uphold research integrity’ | Research Professional News | ●研究公正 |
2024-12 | ニセ科学との戦いの先頭に立つパリ宣言 --- Paris declaration to spearhead fight against fake science | Research Information | ●パリ宣言 |
2024-12 | NOT-OD-25-047: 2024 NIH パブリック アクセス ポリシー --- NOT-OD-25-047: 2024 NIH Public Access Policy | NIH | ●NIHの成果公表規則 |
2024-12 | 元NIH内部関係者による率直かつ痛烈な意見 --- Some Candid and Scathing Opinions from a Former NIH Insider | goodscience | ●NIH改革 |
2024-12 | 分類の変更 --- Changes to the classification | Publication Forum | ●MDPIとFrontiersなどの格下げ |
2024-12 | ゴミから宝物を取り出す --- Extracting treasure from trash | Opinion | Chemistry World | ●クリーンアップが必要 |
2024-12 | 捕食出版の台頭 --- The rise of predatory publishing | Greece@LSE | ●捕食出版 |
2024-12 | 2025 年の捕食出版 --- Predatory Publishing in 2025 | Research Information | ●捕食出版 |
2024-12 | アルツハイマー病研究における不正行為はどの程度悪質なのか?神経科医の探偵マシュー・シュラグ氏との QA --- How Bad Is Fraud in Alzheimer’s Research? Q&A With Neurologist-Sleuth Matthew Schrag | Being Patient | ●アルツハイマー病研究 |
2024-12 | [2412.03775]WithdrarXiv: 撤回研究のための大規模データセット --- [2412.03775] WithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction Study | arxiv.org | ●14,000 以上の撤回論文 |
2024-12 | それはとてもメタです — NIH の科学の科学奨学生プログラム パイロットの応募受付中 – NIH Extramural Nexus --- That’s So Meta — Applications Open for NIH’s Science of Science Scholars Program Pilot | NIH Extramural Nexus | ●科学の科学 |
2024-12 | 科学コミュニケーションの危機をマッピングする (ただし解決はしない) --- Mapping (but not solving) the science communication crisis | universityworldnews | ●学術の規模 |
2024-12 | 新たな調査で画期的なチカグレロル裁判に疑問が投げかけられる --- New Investigation Casts Doubt on Landmark Ticagrelor Trial | medscape | ●チカグレロル裁判 |
2024-12 | 「第二の生命の樹」が大混乱を引き起こす可能性、科学者らが警告 --- A ‘Second Tree of Life’ Could Wreak Havoc, Scientists Warn | New York Times | ●ミラー分子 |
2024-12 | 中国ガラガラジャーナル編集者からの賄賂の申し出。彼らは騙されているのでしょうか?--- Bribery offers from China rattle journal editors. Are they being scammed? | Retraction Watch | ●賄賂 |
2024-12 | カナダにおける民間資金による研究に対する監督の欠如に対する懸念 --- Concerns over lack of oversight for privately funded research in Canada
| timeshighereducation | ◎民間研究での不正どーする |
2024-12 | 韓国、学術「論文工場」による増大する脅威に直面、報告書が判明 --- South Korea Faces Growing Threat from Academic 'Paper Mills,' Report Finds | Be Korea-savvy | ●韓国 |
2024-12 | ResearchGate での指標詐欺 --- Metrics fraud on ResearchGate | Journal of Informetrics | ●指標詐欺 |
2024-12 | なぜ学術著者は精子提供者と同じように使い捨てにされるのでしょうか? --- Why are academic authors treated as disposably as sperm donors? | timeshighereducation | ●使い捨て |
2024-12 | 世界で最も引用されている数十人の科学者がサウジアラビアで働いていると虚偽の主張をやめる --- Dozens of the world’s most cited scientists stop falsely claiming to work in Saudi Arabia | EL PAÍS English | ●サウジの高被引用 |
2024-12 | 「とても不快な気分だった」:この科学者の名前は偽の査読を書くために使われた--- ‘It felt very icky’: This scientist’s name was used to write fake peer reviews | Science | AAAS | ●なりすまし |
2024-12 | アフリカの高等教育機関における研究公正ポリシーはほとんど存在しない --- Research integrity policies in African HE few and far between | universityworldnews | ●アフリカ |
2024-11 | 中国寧夏回族自治区の医療専門家における研究の誠実さに関する知識、態度、実践に関する研究 --- A study on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of research integrity among medical professionals in Ningxia, China | BMC Medical Education | ●アンケート:中国 |
2024-11 | 科学全体にわたる非常に生産的な出版行動の進化するパターン--- Evolving patterns of extremely productive publishing behavior across science | bioRxiv | ●有力者の論文撤回 |
2024-11 | 論文工場とは何か、その仕組みと科学への影響: 氷山の一角の紹介 --- What are paper mills, how they act and their consequences to science: an introduction to the tip of the iceberg | nathannerost | ● 論文工場 |
2024-11 | 高被引用研究者 - 分析 - 2024 |クラリベイト --- Highly Cited Researchers - Analysis - 2024 | Clarivate | ● 「Highly Cited Researchers 2024」 |
2024-11 | 引用数と身長:もはやそれほど単純ではありません --- Citations and stature: Not so simple anymore | Clarivate | ● 「Highly Cited Researchers 2024」リスト |
2024-11 | 贖罪としての自己撤回:悔い改めた著者のための許し --- Self-Retraction as Redemption: Forgiveness for Repentant Authors | OSF Preprints | ● 自己撤回 |
2024-11 | USF教授による新しい研究は、州の医療委員会の役割と誤った情報の拡散に焦点を当てています --- New study by USF professor focuses on role of state medical boards and the spread of misinformation | University of South Florida | ●医療誤情報 |
2024-12 | 言葉を使うとき・・・学術上の重罪と軽罪—悪影響--- When I use a word . . . Academic felonies and misdemeanours—adverse effects | BMJ | ●犯罪 |
2024-11 | 私が言葉を使うとき...アカデミック・インテグリティ—重罪と軽犯罪 --- When I use a word . . . Academic integrity—felonies and misdemeanours | BMJ | ●犯罪。解説済(7-172) |
2024-11 | SciCrunchのアニタ・バンドロウスキーへのインタビュー --- Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Anita Bandrowski of SciCrunch | Scholarly Kitchen | ●アニタ・バンドロウスキー |
2024-11 | グリーンオープンアクセス - 著者は無料ですが、読者は有料 --- Green Open Access - Free for Authors But at a Cost for Readers | Scholarly Kitchen | 〇グリーンオープンアクセス |
2024-11 | スイスの研究は、科学論文の撤退という成長現象の影響を受けません --- La recherche suisse n'échappe pas au phénomène grandissant des retraits d'articles scientifiques | rts.ch - Sciences-Tech. | 〇スイス |
2024-11 | 106. ユージェニー・ライヒ(パート2):科学的詐欺の合法性、詐欺師が刑務所に行くことがめったにない理由、内部告発者が何をすることが許されているか --- 106. Eugenie Reich (Part 2): The legalities of scientific fraud, why fraudsters rarely go to prison, and what whistleblowers are allowed to do | bjks | ●Eugenie Reich |
2024-11 | 105. ユージェニー・ライヒ(パート1):プラスチック・ファンタスティック、科学的な詐欺、制度的規範 --- 105. Eugenie Reich (Part 1): Plastic Fantastic, scientific fraud, and institutional norms | bjks | ●Eugenie Reich |
2024-11 | ランキング圧力が研究の信頼性を損なう --- Ranking Pressure Takes Toll On Research Credibility | Fortune India | ●論文工場 |
2024-11 | 論文が多すぎてもかまいませんか? --- Can you publish too many papers? | Research Whisperer | ●多数論文出版 |
2024-11 | 生物医学科学者は、自分の発見を再現するのに苦労しています --- Biomedical scientists struggle to replicate own findings | timeshighereducation | ●再現性 |
2024-11 | 研究の再現性に関する生物医学研究者の視点 --- Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research | PLOS Biology | ●再現性 |
2024-11 | 疑わしい研究慣行、科学的規範、組織文化との関連性を探る --- Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture | Research Integrity and Peer Review | Full Text | ●クログレイと文化 |
2024-11 | STATの「知っておくべき人」:話題の7人の科学探偵 --- STAT's Who to Know: 7 science sleuths making headlines | STAT | ●ネカトハンター |
2024-11 | 科学倫理における国境を越えたバリエーション:中国、米国、英国の科学者の倫理的視点の探求 --- Cross-National Variations in Scientific Ethics: Exploring Ethical Perspectives Among Scientists in China, the US, and the UK | Science and Engineering Ethics | ●出版プレッシャ― |
2024-11 | 捕食出版とジャーナルの台頭 --- The rise of predatory publishing and journals | British Dental Journal | ●捕食 |
2024-11 | 偽の学位やゾンビ大学を追い詰める方法 --- How I hunt down fake degrees and zombie universities | nature | ●ゾンビ大学 |
2024-11 | 抗体が効かない!実験を台無しにする分子を研究室から排除する競争 --- The antibodies don’t work! The race to rid labs of molecules that ruin experiments | nature | ●抗体 |
2024-11 | ChatGPTはピアレビューを変革しています - 私たちはどのように責任を持ってそれを使うことができるのでしょうか? --- ChatGPT is transforming peer review — how can we use it responsibly? | nature | ●ChatGPT 日本語訳(gigazine) |
2024-11 | 「忌まわしい研究」 --- "Afskyelig forskning" | Forskerforum | ●中国の人種問題 |
2024-11 | ジョナサン・ハイトは、ソーシャルメディア戦争を始めた。彼は勝ったのでしょうか? --- Jonathan Haidt Started a Social-Media War. Did He Win? | chronicle | ●社交メディア |
2024-11 | 書評:なぜ医療体制はしばしばそれを間違えるのか --- Book Review: Why the Medical Establishment Often Gets It Wrong | undark | ●医療の間違い |
2024-11 | 偽の学位やゾンビ大学を追い詰める方法 --- How I hunt down fake degrees and zombie universities | nature | ●教育詐欺、学位工場 |
2023 | 高等教育における偽の学位と不正な資格情報 --- Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education | Springer 著書 | ●教育詐欺、学位工場 |
2024-10 | 出版社は、研究著作権に関する「偏った」EU報告書を非難 --- Publishers blast ‘biased’ EU report on research copyright | Research Professional News | ●著作権 |
2024-10 | 査読プロセスにおける根本的な問題と、改善のための潜在的な提案に対する利害関係者の認識--- Fundamental problems in the peer‐review process and stakeholders' perceptions of potential suggestions for improvement | Learned Publishing - Wiley Online Library | ●査読 |
2024-10 | 論文工場からの科学論文を来歴分析で公開 --- Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis | PLOS ONE | ●論文工場 |
2024-10 | スキャンダルから改革へ:ターニングポイントにおける研究公正へのアプローチ --- From scandal to reform: approaches to research integrity at a turning point | tandfonline | ●歴史的 |
2024-10 | なぜすべての研究者が自分のデータをオープンに共有しないのですか? --- Why don’t all researchers share their data openly? | timeshighereducation | ●共有 |
2024-10 | アカデミーは、出版物の共有に関するEU全体のルールを求めています--- Academies call for EU-wide rules on sharing publications | Research Professional News | ●共有 |
2024-10 | 汝、してはならない!– 研究不正スキャンダルの制度的な後世が研究公正トレーニングをどのように形成するか --- Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training | tandfonline | ●研修 |
2024-10 | 社説:記事の撤回は研究者のメンタルヘルスを危険にさらす可能性がありますか? --- Editorial: can the retraction of articles endanger the mental health of researchers? | tandfonline | ●論文撤回者 |
2024-10 | なぜ人々は科学を選択的に否定するのですか? --- Why do people selectively reject science? | immunologic | ●信じる根拠 |
2024-10 | ヘルシンキ宣言に研究不正を追加 --- Declaration of Helsinki revision adds nod to research misconduct | Retraction Watch | ◎ヘルシンキ宣言 |
2024-10 | 研究の公正性のための変革的合意の活用 --- Leveraging Transformative Agreements for Research Integrity | Scholarly Kitchen | ● |
2024-10 | Google Scholarは(まだ)壊れていませんが、代替手段があります|社会科学の影響 --- Google Scholar is not broken (yet), but there are alternatives | Impact of Social Sciences | ● |
2024-10 | 論文工場:不正な科学雑誌の背後にいる「カルテルのような」企業 --- Paper mills: the ‘cartel-like’ companies behind fraudulent scientific journals | conversation | ●論文工場 |
2024-10 | あなたが何を持っているかは、それがなくなるまでわかりません:英国の学術社会出版の変化する風景 --- You don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone: the changing landscape of UK learned society publishing | Insights | ●学術出版 |
2024-10 | 私が言葉を使うとき...アカデミック・インテグリティ - 簡単な歴史、提案された定義、ガイドライン、違反 --- When I use a word . . . Academic integrity—a brief history, a proposed definition, guidelines, and violations | BMJ | ●研究公正 |
2024-10 | 動物実験に反対する科学者たちは、自分たちが仲間によって凍結されていると主張 --- Scientists who object to animal testing claim they are frozen out by peers | Independent | ◎動物実験 |
2024-10 | メタリサーチが研究について教えてくれたことと研究実践の変化 --- What meta‐research has taught us about research and changes to research practices | onlinelibrary | ◎ジョン・アイオアニディス |
2024-10 | 学術出版物における科学的完全性の解明:計量書誌学的アプローチ--- Unveiling scientific integrity in scholarly publications: a bibliometric approach | International Journal for Educational Integrity | ◎研究公正 |
2024-10 | 学術出版:部屋の中の象(およびその他の野生生物) --- Scholarly Publishing: The Elephant (And Other Wildlife) In The Room | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎査読 |
2024-10 | 進歩派は、自分の好きな科学的発見についてもっと心配すべきだ --- Progressives should worry more about their favorite scientific findings | smallpotatoes | ◎視点がユニーク |
2024-10 | アルツハイマー病の臨床試験で製薬会社がボランティアに伝えなかったこと--- What Drugmakers Did Not Tell Volunteers in Alzheimer’s Trials - The New York Times | New York Times | ●製薬会社 |
2024-10 | 捕食学学術誌の暴露:匿名の探偵アカウントが公開される --- Exposing predatory journals: anonymous sleuthing account goes public | nature | ●グラハム・ケンダルの話 |
2024-10 | 詐欺師、嘘つき、強盗:高等教育の危機 --- Cheaters, Liars, and Robbers: A Higher Education Crisis | Minding The Campus | ●高等教育の危機 |
2024-10 | 研究の不正行為を振り返る:ウォッチャーコミュニティの次は? --- Reflecting on research misconduct: What’s next for the watcher community? | Retraction Watch | ●研究不正 |
2024-10 | 「グリーン水素」は単なる別の気候詐欺 --- ‘Green Hydrogen’ Just Another Climate Scam | goodoil | ●グリーン水素 |
2024-10 | 論文工場の課題:過去、現在、未来 --- Paper Mill challenges: past, present and futur | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | ●論文工場 |
2024-10 | 全く新しい倫理審査制度を提案 – 研究者の勝利 - --- Completely new system for ethical review proposed – a victory for researchers | Universitetsläraren | ●倫理審査 |
2024-10 | 査読の黎明期:過去のレポートから得られる5つの洞察 --- The early days of peer review: five insights from historical reports | nature | ●査読の黎明期: |
2024-10 | ネカトハンターからの公開書簡により、Scientific Reportsの研究公正性に対する懸念が提起される --- Open letter from fraud sleuths raises concerns over research integrity at Scientific Reports | Chemistry World | ●公開書簡 |
2024-10 | Scientific Reportsに関する公開書簡--- An open letter regarding Scientific Reports | BishopBlog: | ●公開書簡 |
2024-10 | 科学の「インテグリティ」とその不満 --- Science 'Integrity' and Its Discontents | Minding The Campus | ◎研究公正 |
2024-10 | 疑わしい研究慣行、科学的規範、組織文化との関連性を探る --- Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture | Research Integrity and Peer Review | ◎クログレイ |
2024-10 | 盗用、撤回された記事、疑わしい参照:研究工場がハンガリーに到着しました --- Plagizált, visszavont cikkek, gyanús hivatkozások: Magyarországra is megérkeztek a tanulmánygyárak | Telex | ◎論文工場物語 |
2024-10 | 私の論文は間違っていることが証明されました。眠れない夜を過ごした後、次に私がしたことは次のとおりです --- My paper was proved wrong. After a sleepless night, here’s what I did next | nature | 〇個人体験 |
2024-10 | 隠されたヒドラ:ある論文工場の操業の大規模なフットプリントを明らかにする --- Hidden hydras: uncovering the massive footprint of one paper mill’s operations | Retraction Watch | ●論文工場 |
2024-9 | 研究詐欺と不正行為 --- Research Fraud and Misconduct | Irish Medical Journal | ◎研究詐欺と不正行為 |
2024-9 | 科学的開示と企業不正行為 --- Scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct | Pacific-Basin Finance Journal | ◎透明性と不正 |
2024-9 | 査読の民営化 --- Privatizing Review | IRB Lessons | ●査読の民営化 |
2024-9 | AI盗作は大学教授を圧倒している --- AI Plagiarism Is Overwhelming College Professors | Business Insider | ◎AI |
2024-9 | 中国の科学者は、しばしば自国の研究を引用します。それは世界の研究ランキングを歪めていませんか? --- China’s scientists often cite work from their own nation. Is that skewing global research rankings? | Science | AAAS | ◎中国の問題、日本語訳(gigazine) |
2024-9 | EPAの監察総監室がEPAの科学公正局を批判 --- EPA’s Office of Inspector General Criticizes the EPA Scientific Integrity Office | Union of Concerned Scientists | ●EPAの問題 |
2024-9 | 研究不正行為に関する新しいガイドラインは、さまざまな反応を引き出します --- New guidelines on research misconduct draw mixed response | stat | ●ORIの新規則 |
2024-9 | 「出版するか滅びるか」という考え方が、研究論文の撤回を助長し、科学を弱体化させています --- The ‘publish or perish’ mentality is fuelling research paper retractions – and undermining science | conversation | ◎‘publish or perish’ |
2024-9 | 科学論文の7分の1は偽物であり、著者が「非常に非体系的」と呼ぶ研究を示唆しています --- 1 in 7 scientific papers is fake, suggests study that author calls ‘wildly nonsystematic’ | Retraction Watch | ◎ヘザーズ |
2024-9 | ライフサイエンスの出版を悩ませている5つの問題-そして1つの一般的な原因 --- Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause | FEBS Letters | ◎学術不正 |
2024-9 | アカハラは止められるのか? --- Can academic bullying be stopped? | Science | AAAS | ◎アカハラ |
2024-9 | 偽のジャーナルは出版社ではなく、不誠実なリフォーマッターです --- Fake journals aren’t publishers at all – they are dishonest reformatters | timeshighereducation | ◎偽学術誌 |
2024-9 | ドイツの「市民評議会」が偽情報の犯罪化を呼びかける --- German "Citizens Council" Calls for Criminalisation of Disinformation | Daily Sceptic | ◎偽情報の犯罪化 |
2024-9 | データ操作は科学を侵食する --- Data Manipulation Erodes Science | elearncollege | ●ネカト |
2024-9 | 間違った薬名を使用した一連の研究で撤回された最初の論文 --- First paper retracted in string of studies using the wrong medication name | Retraction Watch | ●間違った薬名 |
2024-9 | 犯罪の研究?インドの科学者ゲームピアレビューシステム --- Research crime? Indian scientists gaming peer review system | print | 〇インド |
2024-9 | がん研究における再現性と持続可能性に向けて --- Towards replicability and sustainability in cancer research | BJC Reports | 〇再現性 |
2024-9 | 研究公正に関する懸念の傾向と出版社の進化する役割 --- Trends in research integrity concerns and the evolving role of the publisher | Insights | 〇出版社 |
2024-9 | 「ゴラム効果」は、学界に恐ろしく、厄介で、不潔な影響を与えています--- ScienceAdviser: The “Gollum effect” is having a horrid, nasty, filthy impact on academia | Science | AAAS | ●ゴラム効果 |
2024-9 | 不正行為を発掘する探偵は、敵意ではなく、感謝を受けるべきです --- Sleuths unearthing malpractice should receive gratitude, not hostility | timeshighereducation | ●ネカトハンター |
2024-9 | 研究不正行為の抑制を目指す新しい学術AIガイドライン --- New academic AI guidelines aim to curb research misconduct | Global Times | ○中国の規則 |
2024-9 | 出版の悪夢:自分の研究が盗用されるのを防ぐための研究者の探求 --- Publishing nightmare: a researcher’s quest to keep his own work from being plagiarized | nature | ○盗用防止法 |
2024-9 | 研究評価文化の人的コスト --- The human costs of the research-assessment culture | nature | ○研究評価 |
2024-9 | 科学と社会におけるアヘン:数とその他の定量化 --- Opium in science and society: numbers and other quantifications | Scientometrics | ◎数値 |
2024-9 | 学術出版社が「査読」報酬やその他の制限をめぐる集団訴訟に直面 --- Academic publishers face class action over ‘peer review’ pay, other restrictions | Reuters | ◎査読支払い訴訟 |
2024-9 | 研究の不正行為を阻止するシンプルだが簡単ではない方法 --- A simple — but not easy — way to stop research misconduct | STAT | ●ORIの新規則 |
2024-9 | 研究不正に関する公衆衛生サービスの方針--- Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct | Federal Register | ●ORIの新規則。解説済(7-160) |
2024-9 | Final U.S. misconduct rule drops controversial changes | Science | AAAS | ●ORIの新規則。解説済(7-160) |
2024-9 | 大学は研究の不正行為に対処するためのより多くの自由を得る --- Colleges Get More Leeway to Handle Research Misconduct | chronicle | ●ORIの新規則 |
2024-9 | HHSは、研究の公正性を促進するために研究不正行為に関する規則を最終決定 --- HHS Finalizes Rule on Research Misconduct to Foster Research Integrity | EIN Presswire | ●ORIの新規則。解説済(7-160) |
2024-9 | ORI最終ルール --- ORI Final Rule | ORI | ●ORIの新規則。解説済(7-160) |
2024-9 | 「ステルス修正」:ジャーナルが静かに論文を修正するとき --- ‘Stealth corrections’: when journals quietly fix papers | Retraction Watch | ●ステルス修正 |
2024-9 | ネカトハンターの台頭 --- The Rise of the Science Sleuths | zmescience | ●ネカトハンター |
2024-9 | ノーベル賞受賞者はロシアの製紙工場に広告を出していますか? --- Nobelists advertise for russian papermill? | For Better Science | ●梶田隆明 |
2024-9 | 疑問視される研究実践に関する調査展開:4つの挑戦的な設計問題 --- Developing Surveys on Questionable Research Practices: Four Challenging Design Problems | Journal of Academic Ethics | ◎クログレイ |
2024-9 | 今、あなたはそれを見て、今あなたは見ていません:MDPIで消える特別号の奇妙な世界 --- Now you see it, now you don't: the strange world of disappearing Special Issues at MDPI | BishopBlog | 〇MDPI |
2024-9 | 欠落しているCOIプログラム、捏造されたアウトリーチ、仕事、健康記録:さまざまな種類の虚偽 --- Missing COI Program, Fabricated Outreach, Job, Health Records: The Many Types of Falsehoods | JDSupra | ●NSF |
2024-9 | 「PubPeerの難問」:大学が「データ整合性に関する懸念の滝」にどのように対処できるかについての1つの見解 --- ‘The PubPeer conundrum:’ One view of how universities can grapple with a ‘waterfall of data integrity concerns’ | Retraction Watch | ●PubPeer |
2024-9 | 論文工場はどなたでも始められます! --- Anyone can start a papermill! | For Better Science | ◎論文工場:ニック・ワイズ |
2024-8 | なぜ研究の公正性が私たち全員にとって重要なのか --- Why research integrity matters to all of us | Wonkhe | ●研究公正 |
2024-8 | Gold Open Access 2024: Articles in Journals 2019-2023 (GOA9) | Cites & Insights Books | ◎オープンアクセス |
2024-8 | オープンアクセス:ダイヤモンドの原石? --- Open access: a diamond in the rough? | University Affairs | 〇オープンアクセス |
2024-8 | 社会科学出版物の倫理基準 --- Ethical Standards in Social Science Publications | Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice | 〇文系倫理基準 |
2024-8 | 学術出版のインフルエンサーというものはあるのでしょうか? --- Is There Such a Thing as a Scholarly Publishing Influencer? | Science Editor | ●学術出版のインフルエンサー |
2024-8 | スキャンダラスな科学者と頻繁に共著者であるグエン・スアン・フン教授は何を言っているのでしょうか? --- Đồng tác giả thường xuyên với nhà khoa học tai tiếng, GS Nguyễn Xuân Hùng nói gì? | thanhnien-vn | ●グエン・スアン・フン教授の不正 |
2024-8 | 科学論文における「柔軟な」アドレスについての別の話 --- Another story about 'flexible' addresses in scientific papers | thanhnien-vn | ●グエン・スアン・フン教授の不正 |
2024-8 | 科学的な不正解決法:研究不正行為は違法とすべきか? --- The staggering death toll of scientific lies | Vox | ●犯罪化。解説済(7-165) |
2024-8 | 科学におけるリスク回避の合理化:なぜ懸命に働くインセンティブとリスクを取るインセンティブが衝突するのか --- Rationalizing risk aversion in science: Why incentives to work hard clash with incentives to take risks | PLOS Biology | ◎インセンティブ |
2024-8 | 研究者が「AIサイエンティスト」を作った - 何ができるのか? --- Researchers built an ‘AI Scientist’ — what can it do? | nature | ◎AIサイエンティスト |
2024-8 | 複製研究を探す必要はもうありません:クラウドソーシングされたデータベースにより、簡単に見つけることができます --- No more hunting for replication studies: crowdsourced database makes them easy to find | nature | ◎複製研究 |
2024-8 | 撤回された研究を最も多く引用している論文 --- Exclusive:Exclusive: the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies | nature | ◎撤回引用 |
2024-8 | 連鎖撤回:文献を通じて悪い科学が伝播するのを止める方法 --- Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature | nature | ◎連鎖撤回 |
2024-8 | デンマークの州で何か腐っていますか? すべての研究分野において、疑わしい研究慣行の広範な関与はあるが、体系的な使用ではないという国際的な証拠 --- Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research | PLOS ONE | ◎QRP |
2024-8 | 研究が盗用され、なりすましの電子メールに悩まされた研究者 --- Researcher whose work was plagiarized haunted by impostor emails | Retraction Watch | ●なりすまし攻撃 |
2024-8 | 独占:数千の論文が顕微鏡を誤認し、不正行為の可能性のある兆候 --- Exclusive: Thousands of papers misidentify microscopes, in possible sign of misconduct | Retraction Watch | ◎顕微鏡 |
2024-8 | 撤回されたアルツハイマー病の論文は研究の風景を再形成するが、進歩は続く--- Retracted Alzheimer's Paper Reshapes Research Landscape, but Progress Continues | ScienceBlog.com | ◎アルツハイマー病 |
2024-8 | PubPeerの難問:研究不正訴訟における管理上の課題・・・Full article: The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings | Accountability in Research | ◎PubPeer |
2024-8 | 科学的な誤りを捕まえるための現金 --- Cash for catching scientific errors | nature | ◎ハンター報奨金 |
2024-8 | 科学界の内部告発:この医師は、製薬会社に立ち向かった後、追放に直面しました --- Whistleblowing in science: this physician faced ostracization after standing up to pharma | nature | ◎ナンシー・オリビエリ |
2024-8 | ジャーナルの利益相反開示ポリシーは地図のいたるところにあります --- Journal Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies Are All Over the Map | MedPage Today | ◎利益相反開示 |
2024-8 | 新しい「AI科学者」は、人間の入力なしで科学論文を書くことができます。これが問題である理由です --- A new ‘AI scientist’ can write science papers without any human input. Here’s why that’s a problem | conversation | ●AI |
2024-8 | 中国で実施されている臨床試験に疑問を呈する議会の調査 --- Congressional probe questions clinical trials run in China | STAT | 〇中国:軍 |
2024-8 | 内閣は、HEの盗用に取り組むための新しい法令草案を承認します --- Cabinet approves new draft decree to tackle plagiarism in HE | universityworldnews | 〇盗用禁止法:チュニジア |
2024-8 | 引用の闇市場:偽の参考文献を販売するスキームは、科学者を驚かせます --- The citation black market: schemes selling fake references alarm scientists | nature | ●引用の闇市場 |
2024-8 | 科学的な内部告発者は、そのサービスに対して補償を受けることができます。--- Scientific whistleblowers can be compensated for their service | Chris Said | ●告発報奨 |
2024-8 | 「欺瞞、妄想、そして古典的な医療詐欺」:癌治療のデマについての新しい本からの抜粋 --- “Deceit, delusion, and a classic medical fraud”: An excerpt from a new book about a cancer treatment hoax | Retraction Watch | ●本の紹介 |
2024-8 | 研究資金をめぐるラットレースが科学の進歩を遅らせる --- The Rat Race for Research Funding Delays Scientific Progress | undark | ◎助成金競争 |
2024-8 | 「ジャンク」の洪水:AIが科学出版をどのように変えているか --- Flood Of 'Junk': How AI Is Changing Scientific Publishing | Barron's | ◎AI |
2024-8 | 英国はメタサイエンスユニットを立ち上げました。他の国も追随するのでしょうか? --- The UK launched a metascience unit. Will other countries follow suit? | nature | ◎メタサイエンスユニット |
2024-8 | MDPIのレビュアーとしての私の経験 --- My experience as a reviewer for MDPI | BishopBlog | ◎査読 |
2024-8 | 論文の発表数を減らすべきか? --- Should We Publish Fewer Papers? | ACS Energy Letters | ◎論文数 |
2024-8 | 2024年のジャーナル引用レポートを理解する --- Making Sense of the 2024 Journal Citation Reports | Lippincott® Author Community | ◎学術誌 |
2024-8 | 引数マイニングを使用した科学的不正の検出・・・Detecting Scientific Fraud Using Argument Mining | Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Argument Mining | ●検出 |
2024-8 | PubPeer の難問: 研究不正訴訟における管理上の課題 --- The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings | tandfonline | ●PubPeer |
2024-8 | 科学的な引用が暴れるとき:「こっそりと隠された参考文献」を暴く --- When scientific citations go rogue: Uncovering ‘sneaked references’ | asbmb | ◎引用不正 |
2024-8 | 写真に写っているもの画像操作の認識と行動の20年 --- What’s in a picture? Two decades of image manipulation awareness and action | Retraction Watch | ●画像操作史 |
2024-8 | マスターファインディングシステムとしての科学論文 --- The scientific article as a master finding system | Nature Reviews Physics | ◎科学論文史 |
2024-8 | オープンな出版慣行への信頼 --- Trust in open publishing practices | F1000Research | ◎オープン出版の魅力 |
2024-8 | 詐欺の学術文化 --- The Academic Culture of Fraud | palladium | ●ネカト文化。解説済(7-170) |
2024-8 | 学術的価値の侵害と不正行為:Sci-Hubの事例 --- Breach of academic values and misconduct: the case of Sci-Hub | Scientometrics | ◎Sci-Hub |
2024-8 | 科学において、もっと直接的な再現をすべきです --- We Should Do More Direct Replications in Science | hdsr | ◎再現性研究に資金を |
2024-8 | 科学者のためのオープンアクセス価格設定の有料出版モデルはアウトですか?--- Is the pay-to-publish model for open access pricing scientists out? | Science | AAAS | ◎出版モデル |
2024-8 | 査読工場、(自己)盗作だけでなく、さらに一歩進んでいます --- The review mills, not just (self-)plagiarism in review reports, but a step further | Scientometrics | ●(有料→いずれ無料) 査読工場 |
2024-8 | 私たちの医療システムは、不正行為者を保護し、内部告発者を罰します:カール・エリオットへのインタビュー --- Our Medical System Protects Wrongdoers and Punishes Whistleblowers: An Interview with Carl Elliott | madinamerica | ●カール・エリオット |
2024-8 | ヒンダウィファイル。パート2:ヒンダウィ --- The Hindawi Files. Part 2: Hindawi | James Heathers | ◎学術出版の最大の失敗 |
2024-8 | 「Publish or Perish」は今やカードゲーム --- ‘Publish or Perish’ is now a card game — not just an academic’s life | nature | ◎カードゲーム |
2024-7 | 医学大学院生の剽窃認識:観察研究 --- Perception of Plagiarism Among Medical Postgraduate Students: An Observational Study | Cureus | | ◎まん延する盗用 |
2024-7 | 科学者のためのオープンアクセス価格設定の有料出版モデルはアウトですか?--- Is the pay-to-publish model for open access pricing scientists out? | Science | AAAS | ◎ネカト事件から学んでない |
2024-7 | 出版公正にリップサービスするのはやめましょう --- Stop just paying lip service on publication integrity | nature | ◎出版公正 |
2024-7 | 研究文化について誰も認めたくない4つのこと --- Four things no-one wants to admit about research culture | Wonkhe | ●Elizabeth Gadd エリザベス・ガッド |
2024-7 | マウントサイナイは、リビングブレインプロジェクトをめぐる議論を抑えるためにキャンペーンを開始しました --- Mount Sinai mounted campaign to stifle debate over Living Brain Project | stat | 〇マウントサイナイ |
2024-7 | ヒンダウィファイル。パート1:タイムライン --- The Hindawi Files. Part 1: The Timeline | James Heathers | ◎学術出版の最大の失敗 |
2024-7 | 中国は研究盗作を罰するために「抜本的な」行動を取る --- China takes ‘drastic’ action to punish research plagiarism | timeshighereducation | ◎中国が処罰 |
2024-7 | 2019年から2023年の間にオープンアクセスのために6つの出版社に支払われたグローバルな論文処理料金の見積もり --- [2407.16551] Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023 | arxiv | ◎8000億円 |
2024-7 | ニュースの概要 --- NEWS IN BRIEF | HealthSense | ◎パトリシア・マレー教授の受賞 |
2024-7 | 研究不正への対処 --- Tackling research misconduct | BMJ | ●対処 |
2024-7 | 捕食学会に出席するのはどんな感じですか? --- What is it like to attend a predatory conference? | nature | ●捕食学会 |
2024-7 | 中国、国家研究開発プロジェクトにおける学術的不正行為に対する懲罰的措置を発表 --- China announces punitive measures against academic misconduct in national R&D projects | Global Times | ●中国、ネカト者処分
|
2024-7 | 研究論文詐欺で解雇された6人の学者 --- Six academics sacked for research paper fraud | Bangkok Post | 〇タイでネカト解雇
|
2024-7 | 出版はストレスが多い:私たちはそれについて何ができますか? --- Publishing is Stressful: What Can We Do About It? | Eos | ●査読拒否
|
2024-7 | 学術雑誌は儲かる詐欺であり、私たちはそれを変えることを決意しています--- Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we’re determined to change that | Arash Abizadeh | The Guardian | ●学術誌
|
2024-7 | 「出版か滅びか」現象の起源と進化 --- Origin and evolution of the "publish or perish" phenomenon | Leiden Madtrics | 〇「出版か滅びか」
|
2024-7 | 研究不正行為に対する処罰強度とその関連要因:中国本土の病院に関する探索的研究--- The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China | Accountability in Research | ●(有料)偉い人ほど罪が軽い
|
2024-7 | 研究透明性指数 --- The research transparency index | Leadership Quarterly | ●透明性 |
2024-7 | 偽論文と戦う方法:重要な情報源のレビューと問題解決へのステップ --- How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem | Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology | ●偽論文 |
2024-7 | 日本化学協会、廃刊誌の保管場所を提訴 --- Japanese chemistry institute sues archival site for hosting discontinued journal | Chemistry World | 〇日本記事 |
2024-7 | 「危険な研究審査法」は益よりも害を及ぼす --- The 'Risky Research Review Act' would do more harm than good | STAT | ◎「危険な研究審査法」(S.4667) |
2024-7 | インパクトファクターを失わないために --- How to avoid losing your Impact Factor | elsevier.com | ◎学術誌 |
2024-7 | 査読は査読に失敗していますか? --- Is peer review failing its peer review? | firstprinciples | 〇オランスキーの回答 |
2024-7 | 世界で最も引用数の多い猫、ラリー--- Engineering the world’s highest cited cat, Larry | Reese Richardson | ●引用操作 |
2024-7 | 世界初の国際ガイドラインで、潜在的に重大な科学的不正を淘汰 --- World-first international guidelines weeds-out potentially critical scientific fraud | National Tribune | ◎ガイドライン |
2024-7 | NIHにおけるレプリケーションへの暫定的な取り組み --- A Tentative Venture into Replication at NIH | Good Science Project | ◎再現性にグラント |
2024-7 | 偽論文と戦う方法:重要な情報源のレビューと問題解決へのステップ --- How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem | Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology | ◎偽論文 |
2024-7 | 学術誌は儲かる詐欺であり、私たちはそれを変えることを決意しています --- Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we’re determined to change that | Arash Abizadeh | The Guardian | ●学術誌 |
2024-7 | 虚偽請求法の洞察 - Eureka!政府の調査官が研究不正を追及 --- False Claims Act Insights - Eureka! Government Investigators Seek Out Research Misconduct | Husch Blackwell | ●虚偽請求法 (False Claims Act (FCA)) |
2024-7 | 「組織的な」学術的不正行為に対する行動の呼びかけ --- Calls for action against ‘systemic’ academic misconduct | universityworldnews | ◎インドネシアのDigdowiseiso |
2024-7 | 多ければ多いほど良い:科学出版の危機の高まり --- More is not better: the developing crisis of scientific publishing | International Science Council | 〇学術出版 |
2024-7 | デザイナー・サイエンス - ビッグ・ブランド・ジャーナルが研究に害を及ぼす理由 --- Designer Science - Why big brand journals harm research | Impact of Social Sciences | ●有力学術誌の弊害 |
2024-7 | 研究公正の実現要因と阻害要因・・・Enablers and Inhibitors of Research Integrity | UKRIO | ●英国:研究公正 |
2024-7 | オーストラリアの機関は研究文化の改善を促す --- Australian institutions urged to improve research culture | Research Professional News | ◎豪:研究不正 |
2024-7 | 科学は研究不正で揺れ動く --- Science stands on shaky shoulders with research misconduct | Drug Discovery News | 〇研究不正 |
2024-7 | ウェスタンブロッティング実験におけるデータインテグリティの維持--- Maintaining Data Integrity for Western Blotting Experiments | Lab Manager | 〇ウェスタンブロッティング実験 |
2024-7 | サイエンスヨーロッパは研究の公正さに「焦点を当てる」 --- Science Europe ‘renews focus’ on research integrity | Research Professional News | 〇欧州の研究公正 |
2024-7 | オピニオン |アルツハイマー病治療のためのアミロイド仮説への過度の焦点は、治療への進歩を遅らせた可能性があります --- Opinion | The Hyper-Focus on the Amyloid Hypothesis for Treating Alzheimer’s May Have Slowed Progress Toward a Cure | New York Times | ◎アルツハイマー病 |
2024-7 | 査読は科学にとって不可欠です。残念ながら、壊れています --- Peer review is essential for science. Unfortunately, it’s broken | Ars Technica | ◎PAUL SUTTER |
2024-7 | 研究者が新しい形の科学的詐欺を発見:「こっそりと参照」を発見 --- Physics News: Researchers discover a new form of scientific fraud: Uncovering 'sneaked references' | Head Topics | ◎引用操作 |
2024-7 | アカデミアにおける悪質な行為の防止 --- Preventing bad behavior in academia | Science | ●不正防止の方法 |
2024-7 | 科学的な引用が不正になるとき:「こっそり引用」を明らかにする --- When scientific citations go rogue: Uncovering ‘sneaked references’ | conversation | ◎引用操作 |
2024-7 | 論文工場の危機は科学にとって5つの警報の火事です:図書館員はそれについて何ができますか?--- The paper mill crisis is a five-alarm fire for science: what can librarians do about it? | Insights | ◎論文工場 |
2024-7 | 学術出版における見当違いのインセンティブ --- The Misplaced Incentives in Academic Publishing | undark | ◎学術出版 |
2024-7 | ジャーナルを超えて:科学出版の未来 --- Beyond the journal: The future of scientific publishing | FEBS Network | ◎新しい論文出版 |
2024-7 | The Bizarro World of Law Reviews | Arthur J. Boston | 〇奇怪な法学論文界 |
2024-7 | 科学は研究不正で揺れ動く --- Science stands on shaky shoulders with research misconduct | Drug Discovery News | 〇ネカト |
2024-7 | 「科学出版の品位に対する脅威」:撤回された論文はどのくらいの頻度でそのようにマークされますか? --- ‘A threat to the integrity of scientific publishing’: How often are retracted papers marked that way? | Retraction Watch | ◎NISO委員会 |
2024-6 | 非倫理的ながん研究デザイン:臨床試験が患者にとって必ずしも最善ではない理由 --- Unethical Cancer Study Designs: Why Clinical Trials Aren't Always Best for Patients | oncologynewscentral | 〇治験 |
2024-6 | 研究者の不正への対処:遡及的、リアルタイム的、予防的な戦略(不正を防止する法的ポイントやデータ管理を含む) --- Addressing researcher fraud: retrospective, real-time, and preventive strategies–including legal points and data management that prevents fraud | Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics | ●ネカト対処 |
2024-6 | 「秘密にしておく」:フィリップ モリス インターナショナルとその日本法人が利益のために科学を搾取し続けていることを示唆する流出文書 --- “Keep it a secret”: leaked documents suggest Philip Morris International, and its Japanese affiliate, continue to exploit science for profit | Nicotine & Tobacco Research | Oxford Academic | ●●日本、たばこ |
2024-6 | なりすましの参加者が定性調査を危うくしている --- Imposter Participants Are Compromising Qualitative Research | undark | ◎治験者の確認 |
2024-6 | 研究効果を高めることを目的とした科学的不正の発見--- Discovery of scientific fraud aimed at boosting research impact | techno-science | ◎Guillaume Cabanacの話 |
2024-6 | オピニオン |科学雑誌には信頼性の問題があります。これを修正する方法は次のとおりです。 --- Opinion | Scientific journals have a credibility problem. Here’s how to fix it | Washington Post | ●学術誌への信頼 |
2024-6 | 科学への信頼を築くことは、社会的・技術的プロジェクトです --- Building trust in science is a social and technological project | Impact of Social Sciences | ●科学への信頼 |
2024-6 | NISOが「撤回、削除、および懸念表明(CREC)の伝達に関する推奨プラクティス」を公表 --- NISO Publishes Recommended Practice for the Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern (CREC) | NISO website | ●米国情報標準化機構 (NISO) |
2024-6 | トップジャーナルの論文に対する100万元の報酬が議論を巻き起こす --- 1m yuan rewards for papers in top journal spark debate | Chinadaily.com.cn | 〇ネイチャー論文で2200万円報酬 |
2024-6 | フィンランドのグループが60誌を格下げ --- Finland group downgrades 60 journals | Retraction Watch | ●学術誌の格付け:フィンランド |
2024-6 | 健康記録:健康にはいくつの科学的詐欺がありますか? --- Health Record: How many scientific frauds are there in health? | informant | 〇科学詐欺 |
2024-6 | 1,000件以上の否定的な文献レビューのデータベースが教えてくれること --- What a database of more than a thousand dismissive literature reviews can tell us | Retraction Watch | ●否定的な文献レビュー |
2024-6 | フアン・マヌエル・コルチャド:科学的詐欺:スペインの大学学長のケースは、ランキングシステムへの変更を促すべきです --- Juan Manuel Corchado: Scientific fraud: The case of the Spanish university rector should prompt change to ranking system | EL PAÍS English | 〇数値主義を脱却 ADAM MARCUS |
2024-6 | 劣悪な学術研究への対処 --- Dealing with subpar academic research | DAWN.COM | 〇パキスタンの現実 |
2024-6 | 今すぐ撤回:欠陥のある研究を否定するには、より迅速に行う必要があります --- Retract Now: Negating Flawed Research Must Be Quicker | MedPage Today | 〇撤回を早く |
2024-6 | 声を上げた内部告発者の運命は、めったに良いものではありません --- The fate of whistleblowers who speak up is seldom good | star | ●ナンシー・オリビエリ |
2024-6 | 社会科学研究は信頼性が高く、信頼性が高く、再現性がありますか? --- Is social science research credible, reliable and reproducible? | insidehighered | ◎社会科学の信頼性 |
2024-6 | 政治学における研究倫理は女性の仕事 --- In political science research ethics is women's work | Impact of Social Sciences | ◎研究倫理は女性 |
2024-6 | 材料科学者がPubPeerにコメントを始めた理由を説明 --- Materials scientist explains why he started commenting on PubPeer | cen | ◎ハンター |
2024-6 | Is This Journal Legit? Open Access and Predatory Publishers | Medscape | 〇オープンアクセス |
2024-6 | 中絶の権利を後退させる取り組みは、論争、否認、または撤回された査読付き研究を使用 --- Efforts to Roll Back Abortion Rights Used Disputed, Disavowed or Retracted Peer-Reviewed Research | WSJ | ◎中絶 |
2024-6 | オープンアクセスは品質を犠牲にしてはならない--- Slutreplik: Öppen tillgång får inte ske på bekostnad av kvalitet | Tidningen Curie | ◎査読 |
2024-6 | Google の DeepMind が AI 引用数で欧州のスコアボードをリード --- Google’s DeepMind leads European scoreboard in AI citations | Science|Business | ◎DeepMind |
2024-6 | 大学ランキングのコツ:ランキングと昇進のコツ --- University ranking tricks: Ranking and promotion tricks | Tuoi Tre Online | 〇大学ランキング |
2024-6 | A Global Network for Early Career Research Integrity Practitioners | Scholarly Kitchen | 〇若手ネットワーク |
2024-6 | 科学は間違いだらけです。バウンティハンターが彼らを見つけるためにここにいます --- Science Is Full of Errors. Bounty Hunters Are Here to Find Them | WIRED | 〇ハンター |
2024-6 | お金をフォローする --- Follow the money | Total Internal Reflection | ●悲惨な学術界。解説済(7-156) |
2024-6 | ジャーナルハイジャック犯は、その努力にもかかわらず、依然としてScopusに潜入しています --- Journal hijackers still infiltrate Scopus despite its efforts | Retraction Watch | ◎被乗取学術誌 |
2024-6 | 増加している科学的不正--- Scientific fraud on the rise | Star | ◎研究不正の増加 |
2024-6 | 学術出版における研究者の科学的誠実さに影響を与える要因:パス分析アプローチ --- Factors influencing researchers’ scientific integrity in scholarly publishing: a path analysis approach | Research Ethics | ◎研究公正要因 |
2024-6 | 中国のエリート研究者は、不正行為を犯す以外に「選択の余地がなかった」と言います --- Elite researchers in China say they had ‘no choice’ but to commit misconduct | nature | ◎中国の不正行為 |
2024-6 | 失態に対するバウンティハンティング:Russell Poldrack氏とJan Wessel氏とのQ&A --- Bounty hunting for blunders: Q&A with Russell Poldrack and Jan Wessel | Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives | ◎ハンティング: |
2024-6 | オピニオン |SCOTUSのミフェプリストンの決定と撤回された研究 --- Opinion | SCOTUS’s mifepristone decision and retracted studies | Washington Post | ◎中絶薬 |
2024-6 | オピニオン |研究出版社は詐欺論文に圧倒されている --- Opinion | Research publishers are being overwhelmed by fraudulent papers | Washington Post | ◎ニセ論文の蔓延 |
2024-6 | 生物学者、ブログ、そして蚊の駆除論争 --- A Biologist, a Blog, and a Mosquito Control Dispute | undark | ◎蚊駆除のインチキ |
2024-6 | 研究の一番の土台は信頼 --- "The Most Important Foundation Of Our Work Is Trust" | Mirage News | ◎研究への信頼 |
2024-6 | オピニオン |研究出版社は詐欺論文に圧倒されている --- Opinion | Research publishers are being overwhelmed by fraudulent papers | Washington Post | ◎学術誌 |
2024-6 | 「世界をリードする科学者」のランキング:混沌としすぎている --- Ranking of 'world's leading scientists': Too chaotic | Tuoi Tre Online | 〇「世界のトップサイエンティスト」ランキング |
2024-5 | ChatGPTのリアルな実験画像を生成する能力は、アカデミック・インテグリティに新たな課題を提起 --- ChatGPT’s ability to generate realistic experimental images poses a new challenge to academic integrity | Journal of Hematology & Oncology | ●ChatGPT |
2024-5 | 学術出版のビジネスモデル:自己引用と選択性と評判のトレードオフ --- Academic publishing business models: self-citations and the selectivity-reputation trade-off | SocArXiv | ●自己引用 |
2024-5 | 科学は終焉を迎えるのか? --- Will science ever reach an end? | Opinion | Chemistry World | ●科学は終焉 |
2024-5 | 米国の心理学教授のタブーと自己検閲 --- Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors | Perspectives on Psychological Science | ●タブー |
2024-5 | 科学とは何か?定義をめぐるテクノロジー界の重鎮たちの喧嘩 --- What is science? Tech heavyweights brawl over definition | nature | ●研究発表 |
2024-5 | 調査報道ジャーナリストが調査データのずさんな監視と不正について報告すべき理由 --- Why Investigative Journalists Should Report on Lax Oversight and Fraud in Research Data | Global Investigative Journalism Network | ●メディア |
2024-5 | 研究論文の「拷問された頭字語」を検出するソフトウェアが不正行為の根絶に役立つ可能性 --- Software that detects ‘tortured acronyms’ in research papers could help root out misconduct | Science | AAAS | 〇「拷問された頭字語」を検出 |
2024-5 | 学術出版社が出版か消滅かの文化からどのように利益を得るか --- How academic publishers profit from the publish-or-perish culture | ft | 有料◎「出版か死か」で儲ける学術出版社 |
2024-5 | ゲスト投稿:STMインテグリティハブ-ダイナミックなランドスケープで点と点をつなぐ--- Guest Post: The STM Integrity Hub - Connecting the Dots in a Dynamic Landscape | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎インテグリティハブ |
2024-5 | 論文工場が生み出したフェイクサイエンスはAIで悪化する --- Fake Science Generated by Paper Mills Will Get Worse With AI | Bloomberg | ◎AI |
2024-5 | 単独投稿の厄介な問題について[v1] --- On the Thorny Issue of Single-Submission[v1] | Preprints.org | ◎重複投稿 |
2024-5 | 査読を修正する3つの方法 --- 3 Ways to Fix Peer Review | chronicle | ◎査読 |
2024-5 | 「持続不可能」と烙印を押された査読制度 --- Peer review system branded ‘unsustainable’ | Research Professional Newsr | 有料:◎査読 |
2024-5 | 告発や撤回はがん研究への信頼を損なうのか? --- Will Accusations and Retractions Erode Confidence in Cancer Research? | Cancer Therapy Advisor | ◎信頼 |
2024-5 | 科学研究と不正:論文の大量撤回が危機を浮き彫りに --- Scientific Research & Fraud: Mass Retraction of Papers Highlights Crisis | National Review | ◎大量撤回 |
2024-5 | 中欧・東欧が捕食出版社に反撃 --- Central and eastern Europe bites back at predatory publishers | Science|Business | ◎捕食出版社 |
2024-5 | コピー&ペースト:盗用疑惑が文化戦争の新たなフロンティアとなった経緯 --- Copy-and-Paste: How Allegations of Plagiarism Became the Culture War’s New Frontier | Harvard Crimson | ◎盗用戦争 |
2024-5 | 「隠された」引用は科学研究の真の影響を隠す --- 'Hidden' citations conceal the true impact of scientific research | Physics World | ◎「隠された」引用 |
2024-5 | ラボの安全違反は研究上の不正行為ですか? --- Are lab safety violations research misconduct? | cen | ●ラボの安全違反 |
2024-5 | 生物学研究者が助成金および雇用委員会に参加する際に信頼性をどのように評価するかの調査 --- A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees | MetaArXiv Preprints | ●信頼方法 |
2024-5 | エクスタシーで発見された化学物質の研究は、不正行為の申し立てに悩まされています --- Research into the chemical found in ecstasy is plagued with allegations of misconduct | NPR | ◎麻薬 |
2024-5 | 人間とAI検出器は、AIが生成したアカデミックライティングをキャッチできます --- Humans plus AI detectors can catch AI-generated academic writing | universityworldnews | ◎AI |
2024-5 | EPA、農薬のPFAS検査における「悪質な」不正行為を非難 --- EPA accused of ‘egregious’ misconduct in PFAS testing of pesticides | Guardian | ◎EPA |
2024-5 | なぜ計算化学者はデータを作るのか? --- Why are computational chemists making up their data? | Chemistry World | 〇計算化学者 |
2024-5 | 「出版圧力」は、医用画像では圧倒的ではないものの明らか --- ‘Publication pressure’ evident albeit not overwhelming in medical imaging | healthimaging | 〇出版圧力 |
2024-5 | ボタンをクリックするだけで、「良い」科学についての考えを変えることができますか? --- With a click of a button, could you change your mind about ‘good’ science? | cosmos | 〇疑惑論文フラグ |
2024-5 | 登録済みレポートへの信頼の返り合い --- Reciprocating trust in Registered Reports | Communications Psychology | ◎登録研究法 |
2024-5 | 論文工場は科学に脅威をもたらす--- Paper mills pose threat to scientific scholarship | Oxford Student | ◎論文工場 |
2024-5 | 不正論文におけるフェイクサイエンスが増加 --- Fake science in fraudulent papers is on the rise | Week | ◎ニセ論文の増加 |
2024-5 | 不正論文におけるフェイクサイエンスが増加 --- Fake science in fraudulent papers is on the rise | Week | ◎ニセ論文の増加 |
2024-5 | なぜ私たちはアカデミック詐欺を犯すのか --- Why We Commit Academic Fraud | jamesclaims | ◎ネカトする理由 |
2024-5 | 科学界における極めて生産的な出版行動の進化パターン --- Evolving patterns of extremely productive publishing behavior across science | bioRxiv | ●John P.A. Ioannidis |
2024-5 | 人工知能を使用してジャーナル投稿の不正行為をスクリーニングするために必要なガイダンス --- Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct | Research Ethics | ●不正行為検出法:Resnik |
2024-5 | Must Read! Publisher Wiley Retracts 8,000 Peer-Reviewed Studies Over Fraudulent Research | Thailand Medical News | ● 日本語訳 |
2024-5 | シュプリンガー・ネイチャーの最新の地域別研究公正調査で、研究者のデータトレーニングに対するニーズをめぐる世界的な傾向が高まっていることが示される --- Springer Nature's latest regional research integrity survey shows growing global pattern around researcher needs for data training | Springer Nature | ● 日本語訳 |
2024-5 | 内部告発に関する深く魅力的な洞察 --- Deep and fascinating insights into whistleblowing | BMJ | ● |
2024-5 | ジェネレーティブAIの時代における科学的公正の擁護 --- Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI | PNAS | ◎ |
2024-5 | 「論文工場」の仕組みを知る:映画のカルテルのように機能する科学論文工場 --- Mengenal cara kerja ‘paper mill’: pabrik artikel ilmiah yang beroperasi seperti kartel di film-film | conversation | ● |
2024-5 | 盗用、論文工場、利益:これらの科学者は詐欺研究の蔓延と戦っています--- Plagiarism, Paper Mills, and Profit: These Scientists Are Fighting the Epidemic of Fraudulent Research | Cancer Therapy Advisor | ● |
2024-5 | 信用の岐路に立つ:現代の神経科学は、新しいオーサーシップの実践を採用するために文化的な転換を必要としている --- At the credit crossroads: Modern neuroscience needs a cultural shift to adopt new authorship practices | The Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives | ● |
2024-5 | 科学雑誌におけるデータの完全性には、出版社や機関の「努力」が必要 --- Data integrity in scientific journals requires 'effort' by publishers, institutions | statnews | ● |
2024-5 | ロナルド・プラステルクは、倫理調査の中で次期オランダ首相になろうとはしないと述べる --- Ronald Plasterk says he will not seek to become next Dutch PM amid ethics probe | NL Times | 〇 |
2024-5 | 大学がAI支援論文を抑制するための独自のルールを発行 --- Universities issue own rules to curb AI-assisted theses | universityworldnews | 〇 |
2024-5 | 最高の査読レポートは少なくとも947語です|社会科学の影響 --- The best peer review reports are at least 947 words | Impact of Social Sciences | 〇 |
2024-5 | 学者固有のGPTは、見掛け倒しの研究を可能にする可能性があります(意見) --- Scholar-Specific GPTs may enable shoddy research (opinion) | nsidehighered | ◎ |
2024-5 | AlphaFold3 — なぜ Nature はコードなしで公開したのですか? --- AlphaFold3 — why did Nature publish it without its code?
| nature | 〇 |
2024-5 | 編集者、査読者、ぼろきれ拾い、およびごみ処理者:Simil... : Editors, Reviewers, Rag-Pickers, and Garbage-Handlers: Simil...
| Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University | ● |
2024-5 | NIH IN THE21st CENTURY:ENSURING TRANSPARENCY AND AMERICAN BIOMEDICAL LEADERSHIP
| 議員レポート | ●ORIの能力 |
2024-5 | 出版された論文の誤りを発見するために研究者に報酬を支払う --- Pay researchers to spot errors in published papers | nature | 〇論文訂正 |
2024-5 | 論文 |学術出版のビジネスモデル:自己引用と選択性と評判のトレードオフ | Academic publishing business models: self-citations and the selectivity-reputation trade-off | SocArXiv | 〇学術出版モデル |
2024-5 | 「Grimpact」:心理学研究者は広範な危害を防ぐためにもっと努力すべき |‘Grimpact’: psychological researchers should do more to prevent widespread harm | BPS | 〇心理学改革 |
2024-5 | IOP Publishing report reveals peer review capacity not used to its full potential | IOP Publishing | 〇査読アンケート |
2024-5 | Hundreds of cancer papers mention cell lines that don’t seem to exist | Science | AAAS | ●論文工場 |
2024-5 | Wiley's 'fake science' scandal is just the latest chapter in a broader crisis of trust universities must address | ABC News | ◎ワイリー出版社危機 |
2024-5 | Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere | intelligencer | ● Oranskyの見解。解説済(7-155) |
2024-5 | Barriers to Investigating and Reporting Research Misconduct | UK Research Integrity Office | ●UKRIOの報告書 |
2024-5 | Barriers to Investigating and Reporting Research Misconduct | UK Research Integrity Office | ●UKRIOの報告書説明 |
2024-5 | I’m worried I’ve been contacted by a predatory publisher — how do I find out? | nature | ◎捕食学術誌 |
2024-5 | Journalists should cover lax oversight of research data, says data sleuth | journalistsresource | ◎メディアはネカト報道すべき |
2024-5 | What happens when you’ve had deferential media coverage and then, all of a sudden, you’re treated as a news item rather than as a figure of admiration? | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science | ◎突然、自分が疑惑者に |
2024-5 | Will chatbots wreak havoc on academic publishing? (opinion) | insidehighered | ◎査読者、チャットボット |
2024-5 | Full article: Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | ◎コインの裏表 |
2024-5 | 生物医学論文の撤回は20年間で4倍に増えた - なぜか? --- Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years — why? | nature | ●欧州の撤回理由 |
2024-5 | Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years | Scientometrics | ●欧州の撤回理由 |
2024-5 | Research misconduct in China: towards an institutional analysis | Research Ethics | ●中国の研究不正の原因 |
2024-5 | Medical researchers’ perceptions regarding research evaluation: a web-based survey in Japan | BMJ Open | 〇日本 |
2024-5 | News & Views: Sponsored Journals Update | Delta Think | 〇Sponsored Journals |
2024-5 | Legal threats, online trolls and low pay: the world of scientific sleuth Elisabeth Bik | Chemistry World | 〇ビックの話 |
2024-5 | Integrity of the Scholarly Record (ISR): what do research institutions think? - Crossref | crossref | 〇大学はネカトをどう思う? |
2024-5 | Full article: One index, two publishers and the global research economy | Oxford Review of Education | ●戦後の新しい商業出版モデル |
2024-5 | Infected blood scandal: Experimented on and exploited - the Treloar's School pupils who 'lost everything' | UK News | Sky News | ◎英国トレロア校事件 |
2024-5 | A wave of retractions is shaking physics | MIT Technology Review | ◎物理学ネカト対処議論 |
2024-5 | New chemistry journal folds after outcry over editor appointments | cen | 〇Green Biomaterialsの廃止 |
2024-5 | Flood of Fake Science Forces Multiple Journal Closures | WSJ | ●学術誌 |
2024-5 | Finding the truth in science | Nature Reviews Cancer | 有料:ビックの主張 |
2024-5 | The Replication Conundrum | Law & Liberty | ◎科学に信頼? |
2024-5 | Stop 'scienocide' by injecting more passion into scientific ventures | nst | 〇ネカト |
2024-5 | Journalists should cover lax oversight of research data, says data sleuth | journalistsresource | ◎Uri Simonsohnの提案 |
2024-5 | Hidden Costs of Academic Dishonesty: The Case of Indonesia | FULCRUM | 〇インドネシアのネカト問題 |
2024-5 | Why Is Scientific Fraud So Rampant? | BFD | ◎ネカト蔓延の理由 |
2024-5 | Psychology study participants recruited online may provide nonsensical answers | Science | AAAS | ◎心理学 |
2024-5 | A new breed of paper mill targeting international medical graduates | Reese Richardson | ◎論文工場 |
2024-5 | Is group authorship a better way of recognising team-based research? | Impact of Social Sciences | ◎個人著者でなくチーム著者 |
2024-5 | On lying politicians and bullshitting scientists | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science | ●研究文化。解説済(7-152) |
2024-5 | The new plagiarism arms race | Sunday Mail | ●人工知能論文 |
2024-5 | Sneaked references: Fabricated reference metadata distort citation counts | Besançon - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology - Wiley Online Library | ●論文工場 |
2024-5 | “Research paper mills”: A factory outlet for dubious research | IJME | 〇論文工場 |
2024-5 | Elisabeth Bik, expert in scientific integrity: ‘We need to slow down scientific publishing’ | Science | EL PAÍS English | ●ビックの主張 |
2024-5 | So you’ve found research fraud. Now what? | Vox | ●ネカト対処システム。解説済(7-153) |
2024-5 | Junk science is cited in abortion ban cases. Researchers are fighting the ‘fatally flawed’ works | Abortion | Guardian | ◎ガラクタ研究 |
2024-5 | Academic Misconduct and Fraud Hurt Public Trust in Science | Bloomberg | 有料、◎学術不正 |
2024-5 | Brain biopsies on 'vulnerable' patients at Mount Sinai set off alarm bells at FDA | STAT | 脳生検 |
2024-5 | The Alzheimer's industry | UnHerd | アルツハイマー病研究の問題 |
2024-5 | Medical students are caught in the residency 'research arms race' | STAT | 医学生と論文 |
2024-5 | Questionable firms tempt young doctors with ‘easy’ publications | Science | AAAS | ◎論文工場 |
2024-5 | Cholesterol Denialism is Pseudoscience | medscape | ◎コレステロール神話 |
2024-4 | The academic sleuth facing death threats and ingratitude | phys.org | ●ネカトハンター:Lonni Besançon |
2024-4 | Journals and publishers facing issues from fraudulent sites | Liverpool University Press Blog | 〇乗っ取り学術誌 |
2024-4 | Cureus | Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices About Research Integrity and Scientific Misconduct Among the Faculty and Medical Postgraduates Working in Medical Colleges in North Karnataka and Central India: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey | cureus | 〇インドの研究公正 |
2024-4 | Louisiana’s flagship university lets oil firms influence research – for a price | Oil and gas companies | Guardian | ◎大学は企業の手下 |
2024-4 | An external regulator is not the solution to academic misconduct | timeshighereducation | ●ネカトと外部機関。解説済(7-158) |
2024-4 | Two Decades of Scientific Misconduct in India: Retraction Reasons and Journal Quality among Inter-country and Intra-country Institutional Collaboration | arxiv | ◎インドの撤回論文分析 |
2024-4 | Are Academic Publishers Ignoring the Theft of Ukrainian Fossils? | undark | 化石窃盗 |
2024-4 | Perspective on scientific truth versus scientific evidence; maintaining integrity in global food systems | Animal Production Science | ◎研究公正 |
2024-4 | Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn’t — lessons from a superconductivity lab | nature | ◎natureの言い訳 |
2024-4 | So you found research fraud. Now what? | Barnesnobleinc | ◎ネカトの組織的摘発 |
2024-4 | Send lawyers, Einstein and Maugham: Authors object to PLOS ONE retraction | Retraction Watch | ◎論文工場の協力者? 被害者? |
2024-4 | There Are Mistakes, And There Are Mistakes | Science | AAAS | ◎研究公正 |
2024-4 | Hyper-ambition and the Replication Crisis: Why Measures to Promote Research Integrity can Falter | Journal of Academic Ethics | ◎研究公正 |
2024-4 | Navigating the Science System: Research Integrity and Academic Survival Strategies | Science and Engineering Ethics | ◎研究公正 |
2024-4 | Why fake research is rampant in China | Pegcityexpats | 〇中国のネカト原因 |
2024-4 | A Study on the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Research Integrity among Medical Professionals in Ningxia, China | Research Square | 〇中国の研究公正 |
2024-4 | Perception of Research Misconduct in a Spanish University | Journal of Academic Ethics | 〇スペインの研究公正 |
2024-3 | Are open access fees a good use of tax payers money? | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press | ◎5出版社で1000億円収入 |
2024-3 | From research misconduct to disciplinary sanction: an empirical examination of French higher education case law | Research Ethics | 〇フランスの研究公正 |
2024-3 | National cross-disciplinary research ethics and integrity study: methodology and results from Estonia | Research Ethics | 〇エストニアの研究公正 |
2024-4 | 2 top Chinese academics named and shamed by graft-busters for ‘saying hello’ | South China Morning Post | 事件 |
2024-4 | One Scientist Neglected His Grant Reports. Now U.S. Agencies Are Withholding Grants for an Entire University. | chronicle | 報告書なし大学停止 |
2024-4 | Researchers want a ‘nutrition label’ for academic-paper facts | nature | ●栄養ラベル |
2024-4 | Congress pushes NIH on research reproducibility and fraud | timeshighereducation | ●議会・NIH |
2024-4 | Researchers need ‘open’ bibliographic databases, new declaration says | Science | AAAS | ●書誌情報 |
2024-4 | Shrouded in secrecy: how science is harmed by the bullying and harassment rumour mill | nature | ●アカハラ |
2024-4 | Guest Post - Making Sense of Retractions and Tackling Research Misconduct | Scholarly Kitchen | ●論文撤回。解説済(7-151) |
2024-4 | Journals and publishers facing issues from fraudulent sites | Liverpool University Press Blog | ◎学術誌 |
2024-4 | How Should We Fund Scientific Error Detection? | james.claims | ◎ヘザーの主張 |
2024-4 | Rahman '26: Our ‘publish-or-perish’ culture is breaking the academy | Brown Daily Herald | 〇出版か死か(Publish or Perish) |
2024-4 | PsyArXiv Preprints | Introducing Synchronous Robustness Reports: Guidelines for Journals | PsyArXiv | 〇学術誌ガイドライン |
2024-4 | Things we can learn from the ongoing Heterocycles debacle | Ross Mounce | 〇学術誌廃刊 |
2024-4 | A key chemistry journal disappeared from the web. Others are at risk | News | Chemistry World | 〇学術誌廃刊 |
2024-4 | Fabrication in a study about honesty: A lost episode of columbo illustrating how forensic statistics is performed | ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH | 〇統計の科学分析 |
2024-4 | Little change in Japan’s research sector 10 years after stem cell fraud | Japan Times
| 日本のネカト問題 |
2024-4 | Should publishers flag replication failures in the same way they flag retractions? | Dynamic Ecology
| ◎再現不能論文にフラグ |
2024-4 | Guest Post: FoSci - The Emerging Field of Forensic Scientometrics | Scholarly Kitchen
| ◎新学問:フォレンジック科学 |
2024-4 | Breaking down the winner’s curse: Lessons from brain-wide association studies | The Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives
| ◎反発 |
2024-4 | China’s universities just grabbed 6 of the top 10 spots in one worldwide science ranking – without changing a thing | Conversation
| ◎中国の台頭 |
2024-4 | Impact factors are outdated, but new research assessments still fail scientists | nature
| ◎インパクトファクターは時代遅れ |
2024-4 | FDA describes ‘objectionable conditions’ at New York State Psychiatric Institute | The Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives
| ニューヨーク州立精神医学研究所 |
2024-4 | The Case for a Research Inquisition | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
| ●ネカト対策方法 |
2024-4 | Universities oppose plan to bolster federal research oversight | insidehighered
| ●研究公正局の規則改訂。解説済(7-147) |
2024-3 | Retractions in arts and humanities: an analysis of the retraction notices | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities | Oxford Academic
| ●人文科学の論文撤回 |
2024-3 | Antidotes to cynicism creep in academia | Eiko Fried
| ●学術ゴミ屋敷 |
2024-3 | When it is and isn’t OK to recycle text in scientific papers | Nature Human Behaviour
| ●文章リサイクル |
2024-3 | ORI Budget Grew to $15M; HHS Seeks Level Funding to Roll Out Contested Reg | COSMOS
| ●研究公正局の予算 |
2024-3 | Putting Research Integrity Checks Where They Belong | Scholarly Kitchen
| ●研究公正官 |
2024-3 | The Feds Want More Oversight of Scientific Research. Universities Are Fighting Back. | WSJ
| 有料●研究公正局の規則改訂 |
2024-3 | Universities need to stop hiding from research integrity problems | Science Forever
| ●●●大学はネカト隠蔽をやめよ! |
2024-3 | Full article: Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? | Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
| 〇出版公正 |
2024-3 | $160K Libel Verdict for Ex-Student Based on Professor's Research Misconduct Allegations | reason
| 〇ネカト事件の裁判 |
2024-3 | Ending profiteering from publicly funded research | Australia Institute
| ◎学術出版社の異常阻止 |
2024-3 | Lack of experimentation has stalled the debate on open peer review | Impact of Social Sciences | ◎オープンな査読 |
2024-3 | Is AI ready to mass-produce lay summaries of research articles? | nature | ●●ChatGPTまみれ |
2024-3 | The Latest "Crisis" - Is the Research Literature Overrun with ChatGPT- and LLM-generated Articles? | Scholarly Kitchen | ChatGPTまみれ |
2024-3 | 世界大学ランキングに背を向ける大学たち | SWI swissinfo.ch | 大学ランキング脱退 |
2024-3 | Guest opinion: Scientific fraud puts Utah children’s safety at risk | Daily Herald | 〇ネカトは子供に悪影響 |
2024-3 | The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part XXXII (Sea Level Rise Edition) | Manhattan Contrarian | 海面上昇のウソ |
2024-3 | 中国の大学教授がChatGPTで書いた論文がそのまま掲載?―中国メディア | recordchina | ChatGPT |
2024-3 | AI scandal rocks academia as nearly 200 studies are found to have been partly generated by ChatGPT | Daily Mail Online | ●ChatGPT |
2024-3 | Why is plagiarism apparently more common in research funded by the NSF than the NIH? | Chemistry World | ●NIHとNSFのネカトの違い |
2024-3 | Up to one in seven submissions to hundreds of Wiley journals show signs of paper mill activity | Retraction Watch | ●投稿論文の7つに1つが論文工場製 |
2024-3 | Integrity Issues Rampant in Alzheimer's Research, Say Investigators | Medscape | ◎アルツハイマ―研究者にネカト蔓延 |
2024-3 | Scientific Fraud in the Age of AI | GWC Mag | 〇AI時代の科学詐欺 |
2024-3 | Scientific Fraud in the Age of AI | American Council on Science and Health | American Council on Science and Health | 〇AI時代の科学詐欺 |
2024-3 | Podcast: Fraudulent Research Threatens Scientific Progress | American Council on Science and Health | 〇詐欺が科学をダメにする |
2024-3 | The evil impact of medical research misconduct | Island | 〇医学の研究不正 |
2024-3 | China has a list of suspect journals and it’s just been updated | nature | 〇中国の学術誌黒リスト 日本語訳(有料) |
2024-3 | La superlega dei Top Italian Scientists | ROARS | 〇イタリア |
2024-3 | Publish and perish: New issues in publication ethics | Indian Journal of Medical Ethics | Akira Akabayashi |
2024-3 | Fake academic papers are on the rise: why they’re a danger and how to stop them | conversation | 〇フェイク論文 |
2024-3 | Virtues and vocation: An historical perspective on scientific integrity in the twenty-first century | Endeavour | ●研究公正の歴史 |
2024-3 | The Dark World of ‘Citation Cartels’ | chronicle | ●●引用工場 |
2024-3 | Millions of research papers at risk of disappearing from the Internet | nature | ●●数百万報の論文消滅 日本語訳(有料) |
2024-3 | Science integrity sleuths welcome legal aid fund for whistleblowers | Science | AAAS | ●●ネカトハンター支援に1億円 |
2024-3 | College Advisor Suddently Cuts Off Communication And Former Student Discovers They Plagiarized Their Research, So They Get Revenge And Ruin Their Career | TwistedSifter | 〇教員の盗用、学生の報復 |
2024-3 | AI’s role in rampant scientific fraud undermines nutrition science | naturalproductsinsider | 〇栄養学でのネカト |
2024-3 | Fake cancer research and scientific fraud allegations hit the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Vox | ◎Dana-Farber Cancer Institute |
2024-3 | Strict Liability and Research Fraud - by James Heathers | james.claims | ●●ネカト有罪者。解説済(7-145) |
2024-2 | Science map of academic misconduct | Innovation | ◎ネカトの分野別集計。解説済(7-150) |
2024-2 | As the world turns: scientific publishing in the digital era | Environmental Health | 研究文化の変化 |
2024-2 | 米国で半数の中国人留学生が不正によって退学処分になっている理由—中国経済の停滞と国民の不満噴出[補足編2]-(松沢呉一) | | 松沢呉一のビバノン・ライフ | 中国人留学生の不正 |
2024-2 | Huge genome study confronted by concerns over race analysis | Science | AAAS | 人種研究 |
2024-2 | New documents shed light on MD Anderson Cancer Institute feud | STAT | ●著作権 |
2024-2 | Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct | Journal of Osteopathic Medicine | ●●出版圧力 |
2024-2 | Institutional Ethics Committees Move Too Slowly, Critics Say | undark | ●●調査が遅すぎ |
2024-2 | Charging authors for scientific publishing is fundamentally flawed | nst | ◎論文掲載料 |
2024-2 | United2Act Against Paper Mills: Fighting Fraud that Corrupts the Scholarly Record | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎論文工場との闘い |
2024-2 | Bounded research ethicality: researchers rate themselves and their field as better than others at following good research practice | Scientific Reports | ◎自分の分野は他より良い |
2024-2 | Should we penalise scientific misconduct in rankings scores? | universityworldnews | ◎研究不正を大学ランキングに |
2024-2 | Fraudulent studies are undermining the reliability of systematic reviews – a study of the prevalence of problematic images in preclinical studies of depression | bioRxiv | ◎うつ病の前臨床試験のネカト |
2024-2 | Got chocolate milk? As US schools consider a ban, an old, sketchy study holds sway | School meals | The Guardian | 〇学校の食べもの |
2024-2 | ゲスト投稿 - シンガポールから香港経由でアテネへ:科学研究から実際の応用および政策立案までの研究公正の旅程 - The Scholarly Kitchen --- Guest Post - From Singapore to Athens via Hong Kong: The Itinerary of Research Integrity from Scientific Research to Real-life Applications and Policy Making | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎研究公正 |
2024-2 | Is ChatGPT making scientists hyper-productive? The highs and lows of using AI | nature | ◎ChatGPT |
2024-2 | Influential abortion-pill studies retracted: the science behind the decision | nature | ●中絶薬論文撤回 |
2024-2 | Indigenous people sue over alleged Canadian secret medical experiment | Canada | The Guardian | カナダの無断医学データ取得 |
2024-2 | Why Harvard University Is Failing at Everything | bostonmagazine | ハーバード大学 |
2024-2 | Elisabeth Bik tackles the widespread issue of research misconduct | STAT | Elisabeth Bik |
2024-2 | 2/23/2024: Announcing the Scientific Integrity Fund | followin | 研究公正基金の設立 |
2024-2 | Penn Calls for Withdrawal of ORI’s Misconduct Proposed Reg; Many Commenters Also Critical | Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) - JDSupra | ●研究公正局の規則改訂 |
2024-2 | ‘I should do what?’ Addressing research misconduct through values alignment | Research Ethics | ●価値観の一致 |
2024-2 | It's time to pay academic peer reviewers | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●査読の有料化 |
2024-2 | Why Scientists Should Care About Society Publishing | Technology Networks | 〇学術出版に関心を持て! |
2024-2 | [2402.08796] Reproducibility, Replicability, and Transparency in Research: What 430 Professors Think in Universities across the USA and India | arxiv | 〇国の違い |
2024-2 | Wanted: Scientific Errors. Cash Reward. | chronicle | ●●有償ネカトハンティング |
2024-2 | Research Integrity | YouTube | 特殊:Illex illecebrosus 、ZeebaTV、1,735 本の動画 |
2024-2 | How (not) to deal with missing data: An economist’s take on a controversial study | Retraction Watch | 〇統計処理 |
2024-2 | ‘Publish or Perish’: The dark side of tenured professorship | Washington Square News | ◎教授職獲得困難 |
2024-2 | Worse than Plagiarism: False Firstness Claims and Dismissive Literature Reviews | Minding The Campus | ●盗用より悪いもの |
2024-2 | How common is academic plagiarism? | Impact of Social Sciences | ●盗用は多い? |
2024-2 | Letters: Plagiarism Has No Place at Harvard — or Anywhere Else In Higher Ed | chronicle | ●盗用者は去れ |
2024-2 | A once-ignored community of science sleuths now has the research community on its heels | nbc | ●ネカトハンター重要性 |
2024-2 | Needed: less science hype! | Hill Times | 有料◎科学の誇大表現 |
2024-2 | Why do some academics review so many papers? | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎多査読 |
2024-2 | Passion is not misconduct | Science | ◎Michael Mann裁判 |
2024-2 | Guest Post - The Perplexing Puzzle of the Top 2% Scientists List | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎大学ランキング |
2024-2 | [2402.05519] Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality? | arxiv | 〇人口知能ChatGPT |
2024-2 | Is ‘silent’ outcome switching in clinical trials research misconduct? | transparimed | 〇臨床試験 |
2024-2 | The Poor Reputation of Our Scientists | Opinion En.tempo.co | 〇インドネシアのネカト |
2024-2 | Research Fraud Runs Rampant In The Nutrition Field | Nutraceuticals World | 栄養学ネカト |
2024-2 | Vendor offering citations for purchase is latest bad actor in scholarly publishing | Science | AAAS | ●引用工場 |
2024-2 | Can elite universities be reformed without replacing their professors? | The Hill | ◎大学再建 |
2024-2 | China conducts nationwide audit of research misconduct after thousands of papers retracted | News | Chemistry World | ●中国:撤回論文の全国調査 |
2024-2 | China Finally Decides To Review Research Misconduct After More Than 17,000 Retractions. This Is A Very Big Deal | Daily Caller | ●中国:撤回論文の全国調査 |
2024-2 | China conducts first nationwide review of retractions and research misconduct | nature | ●中国:撤回論文の全国調査 日本語解説① ② 日本語訳③ |
2024-2 | Impact of Research Misconduct on Universities and Protective Measures | medriva | ネカトの蔓延 |
2024-2 | Rising Concerns Over Research Misconduct and Image Manipulation in Academic Science | medriva | ネカトの蔓延 |
2024-2 | Scientific Research Integrity: Rising Cases of Misconduct and Emerging Solutions | medriva | ネカトの蔓延 |
2024-2 | Surge in Research Misconduct Cases: Universities Witness Alarming Increase | medriva | 〇ネカトの蔓延 |
2024-2 | News Outlet Blames Photoshop for Making Australian Lawmaker’s Photo More Revealing | New York Times | ◎豪: |
2024-2 | Make publishing more efficient and equitable by supporting a “publish, then review” model | Federation of American Scientists | ●出版後査読 |
2024-2 | Whistleblowers should have their risks federally covered | mandarin | ◎豪:告発支援、キイタム訴訟 |
2024-2 | Earning respect and trust | Science | ◎編集者 |
2024-2 | NYU Removed 2 Doctors Over Israel-Hamas Posts. Then Their Fates Diverged. | New York Times | ◎コクハラ? |
2024-2 | We found a major flaw in a scientific reagent used in thousands of neuroscience experiments — and we’re trying to fix it. | Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives | ◎C9ORF72 |
2024-2 | ISR Roundtable 2023: The future of preserving the integrity of the scholarly record together | Crossref | ◎研究公正 |
2024-2 | Author-pays will never open humanities scholarship | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇オープンアクセス・人文 |
2024-2 | Editor publisher relationship: A perfect target for paper mills | jigishapatel | 〇論文工場 |
2024-2 | Review mills identified as a new form of peer-review fraud | Chemistry World | 〇査読偽装 |
2024-2 | PROF JENKINS: Plagiarism is just the tip of the iceberg | Campus Reform | ◎ネカトの蔓延 |
2024-2 | ‘Obviously ChatGPT’ — how reviewers accused me of scientific fraud | nature | ●ChatGPT |
2024-2 | Indian paper mill disbands WhatsApp community following investigation | Retraction Watch | ●論文工場:iTrilon閉鎖 |
2024-2 | Plagiarism Is Not Always Easy to Define or Detect | Good Men Project | ●盗用 |
2024-2 | Medical research at stake as fake scientific papers balloon | Juta MedicalBrief | ◎Fakeの蔓延 |
2024-2 | Sex offenders allowed to work as doctors and one gains a national Clinical Excellence Award | Peter Wilmshurst | ◎性犯罪者が受賞 |
2024-2 | Shaping the Future of Research: Uniting AI and Open Science to Transform Scientific Incentives | by Sean Hill | Medium | ●研究界の未來 |
2024-2 | ‘The situation has become appalling’: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point | Peer review and scientific publishing | Guardian | ◎ネカトの蔓延 |
2024-2 | Artificial intelligence to prevent scientific fraud | West Observer | 有料◎人工知能はネカト防止できるか |
2024-2 | Disciplining research misconduct | kathmandupost | ◎ネカトと処罰 |
2024-1 | AI and the Future of Image Integrity in Scientific Publishing | Science Editor | ◎画像問題 |
2024-1 | Briefing note no.4: Why higher education institutions should join the Misconduct | Disclosure Scheme | ●●不正を公表 |
2024-1 | The Science Journals That Will Publish Anything | Office for Science and Society - McGill University | ◎捕食学術誌 |
2024-1 | Science sleuths are using technology to find fakery and plagiarism in published research | AP News | ◎研究公正 |
2024-1 | Weaponizing plagiarism will restore faith in academic institutions | National Post | ◎盗用を武器に |
2024-1 | The researchers taking on fraudulent science | Analyst News | ◎ネカトハンター |
2024-1 | How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications | Scientometrics | ●適正な著者数 |
2024-1 | Citation cartels help some mathematicians—and their universities—climb the rankings | Science | AAAS | ●引用カルテル |
2024-1 | My Favorite Euphemisms for Plagiarism | Plagiarism Today | ◎盗用 |
2024-1 | UWA silent as judge rules geoscientist lied | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎豪の裁判所と大学 |
2024-1 | Detecting fraud in scientific publications | Interview with Cyril Labbé | sciencepod | ◎人工知能でネカトハント |
2024-1 | How many casualties would a plagiarism war produce? | insidehighered | ◎盗用の蔓延 |
2024-1 | Open access ‘strengthens big publishers’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎学術誌 |
2024-1 | Potential Issues in Mandating a Disclosure of Institutional Investigation in Retraction Notices | Science and Engineering Ethics | ●情報開示 |
2024-1 | Exploring the dimensions of responsible research systems and cultures: a scoping review | Royal Society Open Science | ●責任ある研究実施 (RCR) |
2024-1 | Dana-Farber retractions: meet the blogger who spotted problems in dozens of cancer papers | nature | ●ネカトハンター:Sholto David. |
2024-1 | Journal pulls papers following Retraction Watch investigation | Retraction Watch | ●論文工場:iTrilon |
2024-1 | Exclusive: Elsevier journal COPE threatened with sanctions will retract four more articles | Retraction Watch | ◎学術誌怠惰:論文撤回 |
2024-1 | Whistleblowers flagged 300 scientific papers for retraction. Many journals ghosted them | Science | AAAS | ◎学術誌怠惰:論文撤回 |
2024-1 | Female Sexual Predators Are Treated With Double Standards—Here’s How | Evie Magazine | ◎性加害女性教員 |
2024-1 | The false hope of the new Alzheimer's drugs | UnHerd | ◎認知症薬OK? |
2024-1 | Exclusive: Mayo, Florida profs among authors of article tied to Indian paper mill | Retraction Watch | ●論文工場 |
2024-1 | [2401.04022] Identifying Fabricated Networks within Authorship-for-Sale Enterprises | arxiv | ●論文売買 |
2024-1 | Οι υπερ-παραγωγικοί ερευνητές δεν είναι απαραιτήτως υπερ-αξιόπιστοι | Αυγή | ◎多数論文出版者 |
2024-1 | This Indian watchdog is cleaning up ‘mess’ in academia—falsification, fabrication & fraud | print | ◎インドのネカト監視 |
2024-1 | Editing companies are stealing unpublished research to train their AI | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎編集社の盗用 |
2024-1 | Full article: Safeguarding scientific integrity: A case study in examining manipulation in the peer review process | Accountability in Research | ◎査読段階の操作 |
2024-1 | Common Flaws in Running Human Evaluation Experiments in NLP | Computational Linguistics | MIT Press | 〇 NLP |
2024-1 | Is the academic social networking site ResearchGate still relevant? | cen | 〇ResearchGateとMDPI |
2024-1 | Science’s fake-paper problem: high-profile effort will tackle paper mills | nature | ●論文工場 |
2024-1 | Government Funded Science Has a Major Fraud Problem | catalyst | ●ネカト |
2024-1 | Rules won’t stop social science research fraud | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●規則は無力 |
2024-1 | Gift and Ghost Authorship and the Use of Authorship Guidelines in Psychology Journals | OSF Preprints | ●心理学:著者在順 |
2024-1 | Gift authorship common in psychology, survey suggests | Retraction Watch | ●心理学:著者在順 |
2024-1 | Physicians who oversaw diagnostic manual’s revision had pharma funding | Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives | ◎癒着 |
2024-1 | Plagiarism is more than just copying | insidehighered | ◎盗用 |
2024-1 | Science Has a Major Fraud Problem. Here’s Why Government Funding Is the Likely Culprit | Foundation for Economic Education | ◎研究詐欺 |
2024-1 | Full article: A model of the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity | International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being | ◎研究公正 |
2024-1 | “On the ruins of seriality”: The scientific journal and the nature of the scientific life | Endeavour | ◎学術誌 |
2023-11 | Predatory journals: How to recognise and keep clear! | Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh | ◎学術誌 |
2024-1 | Gatekeepers or gatecrashers? The inside connection in editorial board publications of Turkish national journals | Scientometrics | ◎編集者 |
2024-1 | Plagiarism policing serves democracy, not white, Western supremacy | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎盗用 |
2024-1 | Den største trusselen mot forskningen kommer innenfra | forskning | ◎研究界内で告発 |
2024-1 | How an Indian dental college climbed the ranks: A bibliometric analysis with emphasis on self-citation | Oral Oncology Reports | ◎インドのランキング不正 |
2024-1 | Plagiarism detection software, explained | bostonglobe | ◎有料:盗用摘発ごっこ |
2024-1 | The next chapter for Frontiers: to the open access tipping point | Frontiers | ◎Frontiers縮小 |
2024-1 | The Role of the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and Its Impact on Scientific Research | medriva | ●研究公正局の規則改訂 |
2024-1 | Billionaire launches plagiarism detection effort against MIT president and all its faculty | Science | AAAS | ●盗用 |
2024-1 | Rooting out scientific misconduct | Science | ●研究公正局の規則改訂 |
2024-1 | 国際雑誌が大量の中国人学者の論文を取り下げ、教育省は自己調査を要求 | Ban News Network | ◎中国:撤回論文の精査 |
2024-1 | 國外撤回大量中國學者論文 教育部開展高校撤稿論文自查 | hk01 | ◎中国:撤回論文の精査 |
2024-1 | 遭國外撤回大量論文!陸教育部下令各校自查撤稿論文 嚴懲學術不端 | 大陸傳真 | 兩岸 | 聯合新聞網 | ◎中国:撤回論文の精査 |
2024-1 | 中國論文遭大量撤稿 官方下令大學展開自查 | 中央通訊社 | ◎中国:撤回論文の精査 |
2024-1 | Plagiarism is not always easy to define or detect | conversation | 盗用 |
2024-1 | US project seeks standard way to communicate research retractions | nature | ●論文撤回 |
2024-1 | Health Care Attorneys Author Comment Letter on Proposed Changes to Federal Regulations on Research Misconduct// Comments | Ropes & Gray LLP | ●研究公正局の規則改訂 |
2024-1 | The weaponisation of forensic research auditing will not resolve systemic research misconduct | USAPP | ◎ネカト攻撃の無益 |
2024-1 | Reasons of Iranian Researchers’ Articles Retractions: A Systematic Review | Academic Librarianship and Information Research | 〇イラン:論文撤回理由 |
2024-1 | OSF Preprints | Planned but ever published? A retrospective analysis of clinical prediction modelling studies registered on clinicaltrials.gov since 2000 | osf | 〇臨床研究:発表なし |
2024-1 | Major Medical Journal Reverses Itself On ‘Research Parasites’ As NIH Beefs Up Data Sharing Rules | forbes | ●データ共有 |
2024-1 | Australian academy wants stronger integrity watchdog | Research Professional News | 有料、◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2024-1 | Coates | What if It Didn’t Happen: Data Management and Avoiding Research Misconduct | Journal of eScience Librarianship | ◎データ管理 |
2024-1 | Genuine images in 2024 | Science | ●操作画像検出//240107:「すべての学術誌でAIによる不正画像チェックを行う」とScienceが発表 - GIGAZINE |
2024-1 | Interview: Retracted Papers and Collateral Damage | undark | ●ネカト被災者 |
2024-1 | Universities look for misconduct in retracted papers | Chinadaily.com.cn | ◎中国の大学は自律調査 |
2024-1 | Opinion | The Problems Only Start With Plagiarism | The New York Times | ◎盗用 |
2024-1 | The weaponisation of forensic research auditing will not resolve systemic research misconduct | Impact of Social Sciences | ●ハンターの限界 |
2024-1 | A Brief Guide to How Colleges Adjudicate Plagiarism Cases | chronicle | ◎盗用対処ガイド |
2024-1 | Clinical Trial Fraud: ‘Specter of Impact’ For Big Pharma Companies | Pink Sheet | ◎臨床試験ネカト |
2023-12 | Uncovering Data Collection Practices in Student Research | Neuroscience News | 〇学生のデータ収集 |
2023-12 | LETTER | Reading between the lines of retractions | malaysiakini | ◎撤回の含意 |
2023-12 | Is the Patent System Sensitive to Incorrect Information? | The Review of Economics and Statistics | MIT Press | ◎特許の不正確 |
2023-12 | Being part of the self-correction of science | MRC Epidemiology Unit | ◎自律訂正 |
2023-12 | Another Reason Why Diamond Access Makes Sense: No Economic Barriers To Publishing Rebuttals | Techdirt | ◎ダイヤ論文 |
2023-12 | Publisher donating author fees from retracted articles to charity | Retraction Watch | ◎撤回で掲載料返金 |
2023-12 | Sorbonne’s embrace of free research platform shakes up academic publishing | ft | ◎OpenAlex |
2023-10 | Fake Reviews at MDPI Predatory Journals | Predatory Reports | ◎査読偽装、査読工場 |
2023-12 | Commentary: Fighting fluoridation of our water | cleburnetimesreview.com | ◎フッ素添加水 |
2023-12 | Students' Data Collection Trustworthy for Scientific Research? | Mirage News | ◎ポーランド:学生の公正観アンケート |
2023-12 | A MAGIcal Special ERMPS Issue | Science Integrity Digest | ●論文工場 |
2023-12 | Rampant Research Misconduct Exposed: Fraudulent Publishing Uncovered | Clayton County Register | 異常な出版論文数 |
2023-12 | Liêm chính nghiên cứu khoa học: Đã đến lúc cơ quan quản lý phải vào cuộc | thanhnien | ◎ベトナム:公正改革 |
2023-12 | Mistaking a duck for a skvader: How a conceptual form of circular analysis may taint many neuroscience studiess | Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspective | ◎神経科学の循環分析 |
2023-12 | [Scientific integrity faces plagiarism fabricated with the ChatGPT]. | Europe PMC | ◎人工知能論文のネカト |
2023-12 | Peru moves to crack down on scientific fraudsters | Science | AAAS | ●ネカト取締り:ペルー。解説済(7-154) |
2023-12 | When a postdoc in my lab committed fraud, I had to face my own culpability | Science | AAAS | ●ネカト被災者 |
2023-12 | What analyzing 30 years of US federal research misconduct sanctions revealed | Retraction Watch | ●ORI分析 |
2023-12 | Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023 | Accountability in Research | 有料、ORI分析 |
2023-12 | Guest post: Why I commented on the proposed changes to U.S. federal research-misconduct policies – and why you should, too | Retraction Watch | ●ORI改革案。解説済(7-142) |
2023-12 | Research Integrity | YouTube | ●ネカト証拠 |
2023-12 | Hindawi reveals process for retracting more than 8,000 paper mill articles | Retraction Watch | ●Hindawi 論文工場 |
2023-12 | Scientific fraud an open secret | sun | 〇ネカト雑感 |
2023-12 | The amount of research in the last seven years has grown by 50 per cent. Are important findings being overlooked? | sciencenorway | ●論文数5割増し |
2023-12 | Silent, yet indispensable | Research Information | ●研究公正促進 |
2023-12 | The threat of paper mills to social science journals: The case of the Tanu.pro paper mill in Mind, Brain & Education | PsyArXiv Preprints | ●論文工場 |
2023-12 | Federal agency’s plan to disclose university misconduct findings splits academics | Science | AAAS | ●ORI改革案。解説済(7-143) |
2023-12 | Archaeology society votes to ban photos of Indigenous burial offerings | Science | AAAS | 〇考古学 |
2023-12 | Celebrating ORI Deputy Director Wanda K. Jones | ORI - The Office of Research Integrity | 〇Jones退職 |
2023-12 | Integrity of Clinical Neuroradiological Research | Clinical Neuroradiology | ●不正行為率。有料 |
2023-12 | How to level the global publishing playing field | nature | 〇南 |
2023-12 | Research misconduct: Proposed new rules face resistance | stat | ●ORI改革案 |
2023-12 | US universities protest research fraud rules | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●ORI改革案 |
2023-12 | PsyArXiv Preprints | The threat of paper mills to social science journals: The case of the Tanu.pro paper mill in Mind, Brain & Education | PsyArXiv Preprints | ●論文工場 Anna Abalkina, and Dorothy Bishop |
2023-12 | More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record | nature | ◎撤回論文・1万。東亜日報。グノシー |
2023-12 | Scientific fraud is more open than secret | Free Malaysia Today (FMT) | 〇ネカト、オープン |
2023-12 | UNSW to be investigated over 'preliminary' research misconduct inquiry that has taken two years | ABC News | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-12 | Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading | Journal of Korean Medical Science | ◎研究公正 |
2023-12 | In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments | PLOS Biology | ◎研究者評価法 |
2023-12 | View of When Authorship Becomes a Burden: Learning About Authorship Issues in Scientific Articles | Principles and Practice of Clinical Research | ◎著者在順 |
2023-12 | NIH puts hold on $30 million trial of potential stroke drug | Science | AAAS | ◎3K3A-APC臨床試験 |
2023-12 | Spain wants to change how it evaluates scientists—and end the ‘dictatorship of papers’ | Science | AAAS | ◎スペインの研究者評価法 |
2023-12 | New “Meta-Ranking” of Philosophy Journals | Daily Nous | 〇心理学学術誌ランキング |
2023-12 | A Venture Capitalist for Better Science | The Ongoing Transformation | 〇改善 |
2023-12 | How to Stop Academic Fraudsters | chronicle | ●新しい不正 |
2023-12 | How My PhD Professor’s Irrational Remark Reeked Of Misogyny In Cla… | shethepeople | 〇アカハラ |
2023-12 | Ghostwriting's plagiarism problem | Boing Boing | ●代筆 |
2023-12 | The role of judiciary in addressing academic plagiarism | Daily Star | ●盗用と法律 |
2023-12 | Research misconduct: Proposed new rules face resistance | statnews | ●ORI改革案 |
2023-12 | Leading scholarly database listed hundreds of papers from ‘hijacked’ journals | Science | AAAS | ◎被乗取学術誌 |
2023-12 | Call to Bolster Governance of Research Misconduct | Mirage News | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-12 | Wiley to stop using “Hindawi” name amid $18 million revenue decline | Retraction Watch | ◎学術出版 |
2023-12 | Scientists Behaving Badly | Evolution News | ◎悪い研究者 |
2023-12 | How to cover academic research fraud and scientic errors | journalists resource | ◎ネカト問題 |
2023-12 | Cyberstalking pits Harvard professor against PubPeer | Retraction Watch | ●PubPeer問題 |
2023-11 | Defence against the dark arts: a proposal for a new MSc course | BishopBlog | ●学術警察 日本語解説 |
2023-11 | Evolving patterns of extremely productive publishing behavior across science | bioRxiv | ◎多数論文出版者 |
2023-11 | Dr Chelsea Polis: ‘The scientific world recognises when you stick your neck out and do the right thing’ | Science | The Guardian | ◎Chelsea Polis |
2023-11 | Sydney: Graeber sacked for ‘serious misconduct’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎Manuel Graeber(豪) |
2023-11 | Science is littered with zombie studies. Here’s how to stop their spread. | The Hill | ● |
2023-11 | Medical research in Canada not meeting all criteria: report | CTV News | ●カナダのデタラメ臨床試験 |
2023-11 | Frodi scientifiche: libri e curiosità sul lato della scienza che non si conosce | maremosso | ◎ネカト蔓延(イタリア語) |
2023-11 | Assessment report Hcéres - CNRS 2023 | CNRS | ●フランスのネカト対処 |
2023-11 | To improve social science publications let's lose the discussion section | Impact of Social Sciences | 討論欄不要 |
2023-11 | [2311.14720] AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for Academic Journals | arxiv | ◎人工知能で論文執筆 |
2023-11 | Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers | futurism | ◎人工知能が書いた記事 |
2023-11 | Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review | Hesselberg, J-O - 2023 | Cochrane Library | ◎査読教育限界 |
2023-11 | Submitting papers to several journals at once | nature | ●多重投稿 |
2023-11 | Scammers threaten quality of research survey data | Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives | アンケート偽回答 |
2023-11 | Open Science Charter makes urgent appeal for open access | Research Information | ◎学術出版 |
2023-11 | Latitudes: Top editors of a key international-ed journal resign in a dispute over management | chronicle | ◎ |
2023-11 | The SNSF is no longer funding Open Access articles in special issues | Swiss National Science Foundation | ◎特別号に助成なし |
2023-6 | In a Tipster's Note, a View of Science Publishing's Achilles Heel | undark | ◎特別号に助成なし |
2023-11 | Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus | Abalkina - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 〇被乗取学術誌 |
2023-11 | Mendel’s Peas: Inferring Data Falsification | Evolution News | ◎データ改ざん |
2023-11 | Proposed changes to rules for policing fraud in U.S.-funded biomedical research draw a mixed response | Science | AAAS | ●ネカト規則。解説済(7-141) |
2023-11 | No Liability for Supposed Medical Journal Article Misrepresentation About How to Treat Lyme Disease | reason | ◎ |
2023-11 | Does international publishing still matter for social scientists? | University World News | ◎文系国際論文 |
2023-11 | Case Study in Research Integrity: This Application Feels Familiar | Extramural | 〇申請書盗用 |
2023-11 | Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda | PNAS | 〇科学的検閲 |
2023-11 | Research Misconduct Investigations in China’s Science Funding System | Science and Engineering Ethics | ●中国:ネカト監視 |
2023-11 | 'Buying - selling' scientific articles: Consequences of mistakenly buying smuggled or counterfeit goods | thanhnien | ●論文売買 |
2023-11 | Why Research Fraud Is Getting Worse | The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal | ●ネカト悪化理由 |
2023-11 | More ‘highly cited’ researchers excluded | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●引用操作 |
2023-11 | Exposing a most unscrupulous journal | cen | ●学術誌 |
2023-11 | Americans’ Trust in Scientists and Views of Science Decline in 2023 | Pew Research Center | ◎科学への信頼低下 |
2023-11 | When Does Science Self-Correct? Lessons from a Replication Crisis in Early 20th Century Chemistry | The Good Science Project | ◎科学の自律性 |
2023-11 | Who should pay for open-access publishing? APC alternatives emerge | nature | ◎論文掲載料 |
2023-11 | Preregistering, transparency, and large samples boost psychology studies’ replication rate to nearly 90% | Science | AAAS | 〇再現性:心理学 |
2023-11 | Science overturns ban on ChatGPT-written papers | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●人口知能 |
2023-11 | Who Published It? | Asian Scientist Magazine | ●人口知能 |
2023-11 | AI writes summaries of preprints in bioRxiv trial | nature | ●人口知能 |
2023-11 | The Last Word On Nothing | AI is a Terrifying Purveyor of Bullshit. Next Up: Fake Science> | The Last Word On Nothing | ●人口知能 |
2023-11 | The Pelican Project: Building a universal plug for scientific data-sharing - Morgridge Institute for Research | morgridge | ●ペリカン企画 |
2023-11 | Spanish national research council investigates five scientists for manipulating university rankings | Science | EL PAÍS English | ●大学ランキング不正 |
2023-11 | Breakpoint: The crisis of trust in science: Honest research requires honest researchers | Chattanooga Times Free Press | ◎公正な研究者 |
2023-9 | Australia needs a science fraud watchdog — one with teeth | crikey | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-11 | Bill criminalises unauthorised research sharing | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-11 | Unis, scientists unite for first time on need for research misconduct body | smh | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-11 | Independent watchdog essential to combat research misconduct | Australia Institute | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-11 | Watchdog Vital to Battle Research Misconduct, Says Report | Mirage News | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-11 | Research misconduct: Universities, scientists unite for first time on need for integrity body | Brisbane Times | ◎豪:公正局設立の方向 |
2023-11 | Correction is courageous | Science | ◎訂正推奨 XユーザーのElisabeth Bik |
2023-11 | Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics | Internal and Emergency Medicine | ◎メトリックス |
2023-11 | PsyArXiv Preprints | An analysis of functional relationships between systemic conditions and unethical behavior in German academia | PsyArXiv | ◎心理学のネカト問題 |
2023-11 | The “Free lunches” index for assessing academics: a not entirely serious proposal | Scientometrics | ◎“Free lunches” 指標 |
2023-11 | Presence and consequences of positive words in scientific abstracts | Scientometrics | 〇要旨の用語 |
2023-11 | A plagiarism paperdemic: determining plagiarism among COVID-19 articles in infectious disease journals between 2020 and 2021 | Bulletin of the National Research Centre | Full Text | COVID-19での盗用 |
2023-11 | Performance evaluation considering academic misconduct of China’s higher education institutions | Socio-Economic Planning Sciences | ◎中国での評価 |
2023-11 | Sacked professor plans academic defence union | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎告発 |
2023-11 | Burden of proof: combating inaccurate citation in biomedical literature | BMJ | ◎引用不正確 |
2023-11 | What’s Wrong With Peer Review? | WSJ | ◎査読 |
2023-11 | How to catch scientific misconduct and fraud | Vox | ◎ネカトハンティング |
2023-11 | Datendetektive: Ihre Rolle bei der Identifizierung manipulierter Daten in wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten | citylife | ◎ネカトハンター |
2023-11 | The “Free lunches” index for assessing academics: a not entirely serious proposal | Scientometrics | 〇評価 |
2023-11 | Government Statistics: misrepresentation and data gaps | Full Fact Report | 〇政府統計 |
2023-11 | Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists | nature | 有料●多数論文出版者 |
2023-11 | How big is science’s fake-paper problem? | nature | ●論文工場 |
2023-11 | Should scientists include their race, gender, or other personal details in papers? | Science | AAAS | ●論文に個人情報 |
2023-11 | Early-career factors largely determine the future impact of prominent researchers: evidence across eight scientific fields | Scientific Reports | 〇研究初期が重要 |
2023-10 | Fake paper identification in the pool of withdrawn and rejected manuscripts submitted to Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology | Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology | ◎不正データ検出法 |
2023-10 | Edinburgh University failing over sexual misconduct complaints - students | BBC News | ◎エジンバラ大学:学生が性不正対処要求 |
2023-10 | Some thoughts on transparency of the data and analysis behind the Highly Cited Researchers list | Scientometrics | ●データ透明性 |
2023-10 | Open-access reformers launch next bold publishing plan | nature | ●オープンアクセス |
2023-10 | Zombie Plagiarism in Philosophy | Daily Nous | 〇盗用 |
2023-10 | The American Journal of Psychiatry's Answer to MIA: A Silence that Speaks Volumes | Mad In America | 〇編集者 |
2023-10 | A snapshot of the academic research culture in 2023 and how it might be improved | zenodo | 〇 研究文化 |
2023-10 | 1. Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues in the Knowledge Creation Paradigm: The Case of OMICS International, Open Access, and ‘Predatory’ Publishing | Book | 〇 ‘pay to play’ or ‘pay to publish trash,’ |
2023-10 | Why hasn’t Kristie Koski made tenure? | cen | 〇Kristie Koskiのアカ被害 |
2023-10 | Guest post: A look behind the scenes of bulk retractions from Sage | Retraction Watch | ●Sageの多量論文撤回 |
2023-10 | Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices | Journal of Korean Medical Science | ●撤回分析 |
2023-10 | Are research contributions assigned differently under the two contributorship classification systems in PLoS ONE? | arxiv | contributorship貢献度 |
2023-10 | Call for PhD databases to flush out fraudsters | Times Higher Education (THE) | 博士号取得者リスト |
2023-10 | The ‘hijacking’ of the Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems: Implications for the information systems community | Müller - Information Systems Journal - Wiley Online Library | ◎被乗取学術誌 |
2023-10 | Europadomstolen kräver svar från Sverige om behandlingen av visselblåsarna i Macchiarini-affären - Centrum för rättvisa | centrum | ◎Macchiarini事件 |
2023-10 | Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975–2017) | PLOS ONE | ◎心理学論文はほぼ全部間違い |
2023-10 | Why Are So Many Studies Being Retracted? | Mother Jones | 〇生成人口知能 |
2023-10 | Constructive correction | EMBO reports | 〇自己修正 |
2023-10 | How Do We Clean Up the Scientific Record? | Function | Oxford Academic | 〇間違いの訂正 |
2023-10 | Laronde merges with another biotech after data integrity issue | stat | 〇Laronde |
2023-10 | China ‘uses citations to sway global science’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇中国 |
2023-10 | Fake universities proliferate in India | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎インドのニセ大学 |
2023-10 | How the reform-minded new editor of psychology’s flagship journal will shake things up | Science | AAAS | ●Simine Vazireの改革案 |
2023-7 | Sorting out journals: The proliferation of journal lists in China | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | ◎中国の学術誌選別 |
2023-10 | Science whistleblowers need better support – and I should know | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●ネカトハンター支援必須 |
2023-10 | Report claiming net zero will cost UK trillions retracted due to ‘factual errors’ | Climate crisis | The Guardian | ◎ネカトで大損失 |
2023-10 | Knowledge, attitudes and practices about research misconduct among medical residents in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study | Research Square | ◎中国の医学生の 53.7%がネカトした |
2023-10 | Dear journals: stop hoarding our papers | nature | ◎重複投稿認めよ |
2023-10 | Reproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different results from same data sets | nature | ◎再現性 |
2023-10 | Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations | Journal of Korean Medical Science | ◎撤回論文の理由 |
2023-10 | The Peer Review Renaissance: An Urgent Call for Transformation | Scholarly Kitchen | 〇査読 |
2023-10 | Can academics earn a living on Substack? | Times Higher Education (THE) | |
2023-9 | The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward | Acta Psychologica | ◎心理学の改革 |
2023-9 | Letter: reinstate spiked sex misconduct chapter | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●性不正教授 |
2023-10 | Risk and Reward in Peer Review | Federation of American Scientists | 〇査読 |
2023-10 | Listing quality: Chinese journal lists in incoherent valuation regimes | Science and Public Policy | Oxford Academic | 〇学術誌の選択 |
2023-10 | Swedish National Board for Assessing Research Misconduct confirms that research which the Lancet refused to retract is fraudulent | Dr Peter Wilmshurst | 〇Lancet |
2023-9 | Biomedical doctoral students’ research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials | Scientific Reports | ◎ネカト被災者 |
2023-9 | 3 nhà xuất bản lớn vào danh sách đen | Tuổi Trẻ Online | ◎ブラックリスト学術誌 |
2023-9 | Bergens-forsker fikk trukket ni artikler på to dager | FORSKNINGSETIKK | ◎査読偽装の急増 |
2023-10 | [2309.15884] The strain on scientific publishing | arXiv | 〇科学出版の負担。解説済(7-135) |
2023-10 | Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting | Retraction Watch | ●論文工場、人工知能 |
2023-10 | HHS Releases Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Update 2005 Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct | HHS.gov | ●ORI改革案。解説済(7-140) |
2023-10 | Spanish university administrator and colleagues linked to ‘factory’ producing fraudulent scientific studies | Science | EL PAÍS English | ●論文工場 |
2023-10 | Spitting out the AI Gobbledegook sandwich: a suggestion for publishers | BishopBlog | ●数千論文撤回 |
2023-10 | AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers | nature | ●人工知能ネカトハンター |
2023-9 | 3 nhà xuất bản lớn vào danh sách đen | Tuổi Trẻ Online | ●マレーシアで捕食学術誌排除 |
2023-9 | Retraction and Apology - The Standard | standardmedia | 撤回と謝罪 |
2023-9 | An Overdue Due Process for Research Misconduct | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson | ◎ネカト処理 |
2023-9 | Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research: a cross-sectional international survey | bioRxiv | ◎再現性 |
2023-9 | Where’s the Proof? NSF OIG Provides Insights on Crafting That All-Important Investigation Report | Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) - JDSupra | 〇NSF OIG |
2023-9 | The Banality of Bad-Faith Science | Atlantic | ●Patrick Brown |
2023-9 | Maternal health points to need for oversight on scientific research | cosmos | ●産科 |
2023-9 | Anthropology groups cancel conference panel on why biological sex is “necessary” for research | Retraction Watch | ◎学問の家畜化 |
2023-9 | Replication games: how to make reproducibility research more systematic | nature | ◎低い再現性 |
2023-9 | US surgeons are killing themselves at an alarming rate. One decided to speak out | US healthcare | Guardian | ◎外科医の高自殺率 |
2023-9 | Guest Post - Reputation and Publication Volume at MDPI and Frontiers | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎学術誌 |
2023-9 | Criticism builds against Ph.D. careers firm Cheeky Scientist | Science | AAAS | キャリア |
2023-9 | Rising number of 'predatory' academic journals undermines research and public trust in scholarship | conversation | ●捕食学術誌 |
2023-9 | Faculty must help reform how to measure research productivity (opinion) | insidehighered | 研究生産性 |
2023-9 | Who should fund research’s plagiarism hunters? | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●盗用ハンターを支援 |
2023-9 | Full article: The anxiety of the lone editor: fraud, paper mills and the protection of the scientific record | Journal of Mental Health | ◎編集者 |
2023-9 | You do not receive enough recognition for your influential science | bioRxiv | ◎影響力 |
2023-9 | 'Abolish academic authorship', says LERU report | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎著者在順 |
2023-9 | Could AI transform science itself? | economist | ◎有料:人工知能 |
2023-9 | Chinese academic database fined over privacy | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎中国 |
2023-9 | AI destroys principles of authorship. A scary case from educational technology publishing. | Prof. Dr. Marco Kalz | ●人工知能 |
2023-9 | The science that cheats papers: Why the Schillaci "case" reopens a case that was never closed | Hardwood Paroxysm | ●Orazio Schillaci事件 |
2023-9 | Full article: The anxiety of the lone editor: fraud, paper mills and the protection of the scientific record | Journal of Mental Health | ◎編集長 |
2023-9 | The STAR*D Scandal: Scientific Misconduct on a Grand Scale | Mad In America | ●STAR*D |
2023-9 | Fifth of UK research staff feel bullied | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎アカハラ英国 |
2023-9 | Bullying is a feature of UK research universities, not a bug | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎アカハラ英国 |
2023-9 | Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill | Learned Publishing - Wiley Online Library | ●論文工場:Anna Abalkina |
2023-9 | Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers | nature | ●ChatGPT |
2023-9 | Frontiers retracts nearly 40 papers linked to ‘authorship-for-sale’ | Retraction Watch | ●論文売買。解説済(7-137) |
2023-9 | Putin Daughter's Publications in US Science Journal Draw Backlash | newsweek | ●プーチンの娘の論文撤回 |
2023-9 | Behind the fraud drama rocking academia | Financial Times | ●不正の線引き |
2023-9 | Please Don’t Steal My Work, by Maria Toft | For Better Science | ◎盗用 Maria Toft |
2022-5 | #PleaseDontStealMyWork: 120 testimonies | University Post | ◎盗用 Maria Toft |
2023-9 | Is scientific fraud getting worse in chemistry papers? | News | Chemistry World | ◎化学は悪化 |
2023-9 | Science fiction in university labs?: The case of UNSW and an “anti-cancer superdrug” highlights issues with self-regulation in universities about what constitutes research misconduct | Monthly | 〇科学フィクション |
2023-8 | Should sex with students be banned? | Times Higher Education (THE) | ●学生と恋愛、禁止? |
2023-8 | The Ethics of Publishing Biomedical and Natural Products Research | Journal of Natural Products | ●出版倫理 |
2023-8 | ‘Gagged and blindsided’: how an allegation of research misconduct affected our lab | nature | ●Ram Sasisekharan |
2023-8 | Master Protocols: A Tool for Increasing the Reliability of Behavioral Evidence | Good Science Project | ●再現性 |
2023-8 | Why preprint review is the way forward | Research Information | 〇プレプリント |
2023-8 | When Scientists Believed the Adorable Platypus Was a Hoax | Discover Magazine | 〇カモノハシ |
2023-8 | Survey of research sins in Estonia | News | ERR | 〇タルトゥ大学の公正調査 |
2023-8 | Leonid Schneider, honest among researchers | informant | 有料●Leonid Schneider |
2023-8 | Warnings of scientific ‘suicide’ as US-China research collaboration hangs in balance | Science | The Guardian | ●中国の台頭 |
2023-8 | Bài báo bị tạp chí quốc tế gỡ, tác giả ở Đại học Kinh tế TP.HCM thừa nhận ‘không tham gia viết&apos | Tuổi Trẻ Online | 著者じゃない著者 |
2023-8 | The Scandal That Shouldn’t Be: Why the Fallout Over the Former Stanford President Is a Threat to Science | Cohen Seglias | スタンフォード大学・学長:✕ |
2023-8 | Failed PhD: how scientists have bounced back from doctoral setbacks | nature | 大学院生 |
2023-8 | FDA Finalizes Guidance on Informed Consent for Clinical Investigations | Ropes & Gray LLP | FDA臨床試験 |
2023-8 | Identifying and preventing fraudulent responses in online public health surveys: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic | PLOS Global Public Health | ●詐欺:なりすまし |
2023-8 | Scammers threaten quality of research survey data | Spectrum | Autism Research News | ●詐欺:なりすまし |
2023-8 | Clara Locher débusque les liaisons dangereuses entre chercheurs et revues scientifiques | lemonde | 〇Clara Loche |
2023-8 | Predatory journals entrap unsuspecting scientists. Here’s how universities can support researchers | nature | ●捕食学術誌 |
2023-8 | Science for sale? Why academic marketization is a problem and what sustainability research can do about it | Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions | ●売り物の科学 |
2023-8 | Metascience Since 2012: A Personal History - by Stuart Buck | Good Science Project | ○STUART BUCK |
2023-8 | A fake journal, algorithmic plagiarism and tricking Google Scholar | Crowdid | ○ニセ学術誌 |
2023-8 | Coordinating culture change across the research landscape | Frontiers | ○公正維持は誰の責任 |
2023-8 | Australia grapples with how to investigate scientific misconduct | nature | ●豪の公正 |
2023-8 | University of Sydney gambling research centre bankrolled by casinos is ‘troubling’, experts say | Guardian | ○豪の公正 |
2023-8 | Cuando a los investigadores les dan gato por liebre: el caso de las revistas secuestradas | conversation | ○乗取学術誌 |
2023-8 | Guillaume Cabanac, le Sisyphe de la dépollution de la science | lemonde | ○Guillaume Cabanac |
2023-8 | Methods for living guidelines: early guidance based on practical experience. Paper 4: search methods and approaches for living guidelines | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | ○ |
2023-8 | Using Edifix results to detect research integrity issues | Edifix | ○不正検出 |
2023-8 | Use of AI Is Seeping Into Academic Journals—and It’s Proving Difficult to Detect | WIRED | ●人工知能 |
2023-8 | How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science | BMJ | ●大学ランキング |
2023-8 | Australia ‘needs research integrity watchdog’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇豪・監視 |
2023-8 | Awareness and Perception About Research Ethics and Misconduct Among the Teaching Staff of Health Colleges, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia | Article | Cureus | サウジ、認識 |
2023-8 | My little PubPeer saga – A wake-up call, by Ingrid Herr | For Better Science | ●Ingrid Herr物語 |
2023-8 | Francesca Gino’s data fraud case and lawsuit against Harvard, explained | Vox | 〇 |
2023-8 | Fraud holds back research | bangkokpost | 〇タイのネカト |
2023-8 | The good fight | Research Professional News | 〇 |
2023-8 | The detection and management of attempted fraud during an online randomised trial | Trials | Full Text | 〇臨床試験 |
2023-8 | ENRIO Handbook on Whistleblower Protection in Research | Zenodo | 〇告発保護 |
2023-8 | Authorship Disputes in Scholarly Biomedical Publications and Trust in the Research Institution | Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal | 〇著者在順 |
2023-8 | UK ‘needs scientific replicability institute’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇再現 |
2023-8 | Medical advances typically begin with a study. Now, universities are struggling to afford them | cbc | 〇学術出版 |
2023-8 | Academic publishers scrutinise AI data mining | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎人工知能 |
2023-8 | Artificial-intelligence search engines wrangle academic literature | nature | ◎人工知能 |
2023-8 | Any excuses for plagiarism had better be good | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎盗用 |
2023-8 | The 20% Statistician: How I tried to get a paper that I own retracted: A journey and call to action against Prime Scholars | 20% Statistician | ●なりすまし |
2023-8 | There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit | Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus | Guardian | Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus |
2023-8 | "So, is this fraud or what?" | James Heathers | ● |
2023-8 | Why Cancer 'Cure' Stories Are Mostly Nonsense | Gideon M-K: Health Nerd | James Heathers |
2023-8 | Book Review: A Simple Memoir in Praise of Complex Science | undark | ? |
2023-8 | Science Is Self-correcting? Time for a Reality Check! | Mind Matters | ◎自律 |
2023-8 | Nature’s Proximal Origin Paper Was a Work of ‘Fraud and Scientific Misconduct,’ Say Scientists Demanding a Retraction - Foundation for Economic Education | FEE | ●Fauci事件 |
2023-8 | Inquiry calls for science watchdog after Australia’s biggest research misconduct scandal | SYDNEY MORNING HERALD | ●豪公正局 |
2023-8 | Almost one in 10 Wits health academics ‘witness misconduct’ | Research Professional News | 〇告発率10% |
2023-8 | Nick Brown, une vocation tardive contre le « bullshit » scientifique | lemonde | 〇Nick Brown |
2023-8 | Science Corrects Itself, Right? A Scandal at Stanford Says It Doesn't | Scientific American | ●非自律 |
2023-8 | ‘Major errors’ alleged in landmark study that used microbes to identify cancers | Science | AAAS | ●間違い? |
2023-7 | Major data analysis errors invalidate cancer microbiome findings | bioRxiv | ●間違い? |
2023-8 | 5 tips for using PubPeer to report on research and the scientific community | Journalist’s Resource | ●パブピア投稿法 |
2023-6 | #ChiefEditor #Resign @jbiogeography – Journal of Biogeography | journal of biogeography news | 〇学術出版 |
2023-7 | Concerns about Replicability, Theorizing, Applicability, Generalizability, and Methodology across Two Crises in Social Psychology | PsyArXiv Preprints | 心理学の危機 |
2023-7 | Uganda lacks mechanism to address research misconductl | UNCST - New Vision Officia | ウガンダの公正 |
2023-7 | [INTERVIEW] Whistleblower recalls price paid for revealing Hwang Woo-suk's scientific misconduct | Korea Times | ◎韓国:ウソク告発者 |
2023-7 | Amid Indian Nationalism, Pseudoscience Seeps Into Academia | Undark | ◎インドのニセ科学 |
2023-7 | Open access is inevitable – only the ‘how’ remains | Campus Learn, Share, Connect | ◎学術出版 |
2023-7 | An Index, A Publisher and An Unequal Global Research Economy | CGHE | ◎学術出版 |
2023-7 | The snowball effect of academic crimes | Daily Star | ◎不正雪だるま |
2023-7 | Perspectives on scientific error | Royal Society Open Science | ●エラー |
2023-7 | Science Has a Reproducibility Problem. Can Sample Sharing Help? | undark | ●再現性 |
2023-7 | "Think of the Implications of Publishing" | Honest Broker | ● |
2023-7 | Guest Post - Ghost-writing Peer Reviews Should Be a Thing of the Past | Scholarly Kitchen | ◎代理査読 |
2023-7 | Error, Fraud, and Responsibility | Critical Care Medicine | ◎公正 |
2023-7 | The true cost of science’s language barrier for non-native English speakers | nature | ◎言語 |
2023-7 | Is biomedical research self-correcting? Modeling insights on the persistence of spurious science | bioRxiv | ◎自律 |
2023-7 | Is Hindawi “well-positioned for revitalization?” | BishopBlog | ◎論文工場 |
2023-7 | View of Editorial - The Secret Life of Retractions in Scientific Publications | Principles and Practice of Clinical Research | ●論文撤回 |
2023-7 | Se vende 'paper' por 2.000 dólares: el mercado negro de textos académicos daña la credibilidad de la ciencia | eldiario.es | ●論文売買 |
2023-7 | In some scientific papers, words expressing uncertainty have decreased | Science | AAAS | ◎用語 |
2023-7 | Fraud Quotes to Avoid Being a Victim | EverydayPower | ◎ネカト |
2023-7 | The battle for research integrity is winnable | Research Professional News | ◎ネカト |
2023-7 | Sen. Rand Paul Says He’s Referred Dr. Anthony Fauci to the DOJ for Prosecution | Legal Insurrection | 〇Fauci事件 |
2023-7 | The Proximal Origin of a Scientific Fraud, by Michael Barone | Creators Syndicate | 〇Fauci事件 |
2023-7 | [INTERVIEW] Whistleblower recalls price paid for revealing Hwang Woo-suk's scientific misconduct | Korea Times | 〇ウソク事件 |
2023-7 | The proximal origin of a scientific fraud | Washington Examiner | ●ネカト |
2023-7 | Is Hindawi “well-positioned for revitalization?” | BishopBlog | ◎学術出版 |
2023-7 | The big idea: Why the laws of physics will never explain the universe | Physics | Guardian | ◎天文 |
2023-7 | Meet the author who has published more than 500 letters to the editor in a year | Retraction Watch | ◎多数論文者 |
2023-7 | Elisabeth Bik, un œil de lynx contre les images falsifiées | lemonde | 〇Elisabeth Bik |
2023-7 | Smut Clyde, dénicheur de champignons et de science bidon | lemonde | 〇Smut Clyde |
2023-7 | Open access 'at any cost' cannot support scholarly publishing communities | Impact of Social Sciences | ◎学術出版 |
2023-7 | Replacing academic journals | Royal Society Open Science | ◎学術出版 |
2023-7 | Trials we cannot trust: investigating their impact on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines in spinal pain | Journal of Pain | ◎臨床研究信頼度 |
2023-7 | To make academic publishing scholar-led we need a Norwegian-style dugnad! | Impact of Social Sciences | ◎学術出版 |
2023-7 | The future of academic publishing | Nature Human Behaviour | ◎学術誌 |
2023-7 | Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions | Science and Engineering Ethics | 〇公正教育 |
2023-7 | Costly invite? Scientists hit with massive bills after speaking at COVID-19 ‘webinars’ | Science | AAAS | ●高額請求された講演者 |
2023-7 | Animal cruelty and academic fraud: The two have more overlaps than expected | Vox | 〇動物実験・虐待 |
2023-7 | Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed? | nature | ●ネカト蔓延 |
2023-7 | Science relies on honest observation | FreethoughtBlogs | 〇研究公正 |
2023-7 | The Federal Government Was Funding the Research of Alleged COVID ‘Patient Zero,’ Documents Show - Foundation for Economic Education | fee | 〇COVID研究費 |
2023-7 | Sage retracting three dozen articles for ‘compromised’ peer review | Retraction Watch | ◎査読偽装 |
2023-7 | Artificial intelligence is the new ghost author in urological research | urologytimes | ◎人工知能 |
2023-7 | Journal editors resign, strike in dispute with Wiley over ‘business model that maximises profit’ | Retraction Watch | 〇学術誌 |
2023-7 | Journal to retract papers that cost its impact factor and spot in leading index | Retraction Watch | ●引用同盟 |
2023-7 | UK committee makes recommendations to improve research integrity in first report | Chemistry World | ◎英国・研究公正 |
2023-7 | Research Integrity in the UK: Annual statement 2023 | Zenodo | ◎英国・研究公正 |
2023-7 | Undue publicity for flawed fraud detector | Science | ◎検出 |
2023-7 | Haro sur les revues prédatrices en médecine | lemonde | 有料。非捕食学術誌リスト |
2023-7 | The hidden consequences of fraudulent and poor-quality medical research | MedPage Today | ●ネカト犠牲者 |
2023-7 | Multi-affiliation: a growing problem of scientific integrity | Profesional de la información | ●多所属 |
2023-7 | Trouble at paper mill | HEPI | ◎論文工場 |
2023-7 | Counterpoint: Preprints and the Future of Scientific Publishing—In Favor of Relevance | American Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic | 〇プレプリント |
2023-7 | Point: Should AJE Allow Submissions of Manuscripts That Have Been Previously Posted on Preprint Servers and Received Media Attention? | American Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic | 〇プレプリント |
2023-7 | Is There a Boom in Research Dishonesty? | Mind Matters | 〇軽 ネカト状況 |
2023-7 | Lancet's ‘flawed’ research on postpartum pain medication | The Star | 有料。Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children |
2023-7 | Young China science journal The Innovation joins international rankings | South China Morning Post | ◎中国学術誌の台頭 |
2023-7 | What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions? | Science and Engineering Ethics | ●撤回公告 |
2015-5 | What should an ideal retraction notice look like? | Retraction Watch | ●撤回公告 |
2023-7 | Editors of public health journal resign over differences with publisher | Retraction Watch | 〇学術誌 |
2023-7 | Peer Review Is Porous and The Bastards Know That Now | james.claims | 〇査読 |
2023-7 | Building an equitable global science system | Fior Reports | 〇学術誌 |
2023-6 | A Nobel laureate claimed antimale discrimination. An early-career researcher called it out | Science | AAAS | 〇女性優先 |
2023-6 | Winning a Nobel Prize may be bad for your productivity | Science | AAAS | 〇ノーベル賞の負の面 |
2023-6 | Concerns about 12 MD Anderson Cancer Center’s Pathology Papers | Science Integrity Digest | ●Bik |
2023-6 | Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism? | Science and Engineering Ethics | ●有料:ネカトハンター有益 |
2023-6 | The future of publishing: scientists need a greater say | UWN | 〇学術誌 |
2023-6 | Nobelist: biology needs one journal, not 4,000 | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇学術誌 |
2023-6 | NSF Suspends 18 Awards, Receives Repayments Related to Foreign Ties, Research Misconduct | Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) - JDSupra | 〇NSF |
2023-6 | Delivering on NIH data sharing requirements: avoiding Open Data in Appearance Only | BMJ Health & Care Informatics | 〇データ共有 |
2023-6 | Artificial Intelligence–Generated Research in the Literature: Is It Real or Is It Fraud? | Medical Acupuncture | 人工知能 |
2023-6 | Breakthrough recognition for science publishing’s invisible co-reviewers | Laboratory News | 査読 |
2023-6 | 10 steps to start an academic journal | THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect | 〇自分の学術誌創刊法 |
2023-6 | NIH spent $298,000 in 2021 on ethics training for Chinese scientists | China, Russia are America's adversaries – yet they get US tax dollars | 中国人研究者のネカト教育 |
2023-6 | Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study | BMC Medical Education | Full Text | ●中国・院生のネカト観 |
2023-6 | Academic Dishonesty Lawyers in Los Angeles, California | City Telegraph | ●盗用の法律 |
2023-6 | Corruption in the Field of Medical Science – Unveiling the Dark Side | EUAC | ●医学研究崩壊 |
2023-6 | Science moves forward with productive and meaningful activities | For Better Science | ●Thomas Südhof |
2023-6 | Enhancing Partnerships of Institutions and Journals to Address Concerns About Research Misconduct: Recommendations From a Working Group of Institutional Research Integrity Officers and Journal Editors and Publishers | Medical Journals and Publishing | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network | ●学術誌の対応 |
2023-6 | How can universities and journals better work together on research misconduct? | Retraction Watch | ●学術誌の対応 |
2023-6 | “Truly devastating”: Four journals won’t get new Impact Factors this year because of citation shenanigans | Retraction Watch | ●問題学術誌 |
2023-6 | How Academic Fraudsters Get Away With It | Chronicle of Higher Education | ◎ネカト |
2023-6 | Netflix's "King of Clones" Documentary Review: The Creepy Story Of The Mad Korean Scientist Who Tried To Cloned Humans | Hype MY | Hwang Woo-suk |
2023-6 | To Sanitize the Master’s Corpus: On the Heidegger Hoax | | マルティン・ハイデッガー |
2023-6 | ‘Quietly revolutionary’ plan would shake up the way U.K. universities are evaluated | Science | AAAS | ◎英国の研究評価の変化。論文より文化へ |
2023-6 | The landscape of biomedical research | | ◎ネカト鳥瞰図 |
2023-6 | Atlas of biomedical literature could help track down fabricated studies | Science | AAAS | ◎ネカト鳥瞰図 |
2023-6 | The landscape of biomedical research | bioRxiv | ◎ネカト鳥瞰図 |
2023-6 | Sharing research data ‘a work in progress’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎データ共有 |
2023-6 | The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts | Research Ethics | ●人工知能 |
2023-6 | Retractions Australia launches bid to expose science fraud, misconduct | Sydney Morning Herald | 〇豪撤回 |
2023-6 | Retractions Australia | Retractions Australia | 〇豪撤回 |
2023-6 | New Forum in JSLHR Encourages Research Transparency and Reproducibility | ASHA Journals Academy | 〇透明 |
2023-6 | Experts call on leading institutions to review support for disgraced transplant surgeon | News-Medical.Net | Paolo Macchiarini |
2023-6 | Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public | BMJ | Paolo Macchiarini |
2023-6 | The deadly legacy of a stem cell charlatan | BMJ | Paolo Macchiarini |
2023-6 | Scientific fraud is rising, and automated systems won’t stop it. We need research detectives - The Hindu | hindu.com | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | Scientific Fraud Is Rising, And Automated Systems Won’t Stop It. We Need Research Detectives | techfinancials | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | Scientific fraud is rising, and automated systems won't stop it. We need research detectives | conversation | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | Africa: Scientific Fraud Is Rising, and Automated Systems Won't Stop It. We Need Research Detectives | allAfrica.com | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | Scientific Fraud Is Rising, And Automated Systems Won't Stop It. We Need Research Detectives | MENAFN.COM | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | Scientific fraud is rising, and automated systems won’t stop it. We need research detectives | National Tribune | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | Rising Scientific Fraud Calls for Research Detectives | Mirage News | ●ネカトハンター必須 |
2023-6 | ‘Deplorable’: Imaging journal to retract nearly 80 papers for compromised peer review | Retraction Watch | 〇査読偽装 |
2023-6 | How data integrity issues roiled Laronde, seen as ‘Moderna 2.0’ | STAT | ●企業ネカト内幕 |
2023-6 | Nick Wise, Scientific Sleuth and Fluid Dynamics Researcher | American Physical Society | ●ニック・ワイズの人生 |
2023-6 | Retraction, She Wrote: Dorothy Bishop’s life after research | Spectrum | Autism Research News | ●ビショップの人生 |
2023-6 | Guest Post - A Year of Jxiv – Warming the Preprints Stone | Scholarly Kitchen | 〇プレプリント |
2023-6 | Profiles, motives and experiences of authors publishing in predatory journals: OMICS as a case study | Archive ouverte HAL | 〇捕食論文 |
2023-6 | [2306.06710] Characterizing the effect of retractions on scientific careers | Social and Information Networks | 〇撤回とキャリア |
2023-6 | Plague of anomalies in conference proceedings hint at ‘systemic issues | Retraction Watch | 〇多量撤回 |
2023-6 | How data integrity issues roiled Laronde, seen as ‘Moderna 2.0’ | stat | ?企業 |
2023-6 | Citation counting is encouraging cheating in Iran | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎被引用不正 |
2023-6 | How UC Berkeley won (and lost) race to discover new elements | Big Think | 〇元素競争 |
2023-6 | Why Nature will not allow the use of generative AI in images and video | nature | ◎人工論文 |
2023-6 | Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning tools | ScienceDirect | ◎人工論文ChatGPT |
2023-6 | A researcher who publishes a study every two days reveals the darker side of science | Science & Tech | EL PAÍS English | ◎論文工場スペイン |
2023-6 | How a now-retracted study got published in the first place | Retraction Watch | ◎ネカト者がグラント |
2023-6 | How a now-retracted study got published in the first place | STAT | ◎ネカト者がグラント |
2023-6 | How Shoddy Data Becomes Sensational Research | Chronicle of Higher Education | ◎誇張 |
2023-6 | Did a ‘nasty’ publishing scheme help an Indian dental school win high rankings? | Retraction Watch | ◎インドのランキング不正 |
2023-6 | Did a ‘nasty’ publishing scheme help an Indian dental school win high rankings? | Science | AAAS | ◎インドのランキング不正 |
2023-6 | Scientists Beware! Your University Could Revoke Your Ph.D. | Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC - JDSupra | 博士号取消 |
2023-5 | Among Us: Fear of Exploitation, Suspiciousness, and Social Identity Predict Knowledge Hiding Among Researchers | Social Psychological Bulletin | 〇隠蔽 |
2023-5 | Verlopen domeinnamen van wetenschappelijke tijdschriften kunnen een goudmijn zijn | NRC | ◎乗取学術誌 |
2023-5 | Use of positive terms and certainty language in retracted and non-retracted articles: The case of biochemistry | Journal of Information Science | 〇撤回論文 |
2023-5 | Worries mount about misinformation in science | axios | 〇科学の誤情報 |
2023-9 | Too official to be effective: An empirical examination of unofficial information channel and continued use of retracted articles | Research Policy | 撤回論文の引用 |
2023-5 | The U.S. Gave Chinese Scientists Thousands During COVID For Ethics Training, Addressing ‘Research Misconduct’ | The Daily Caller | NIHの中国人向けガイダンス |
2023-5 | Report a Concern | grants.nih.gov | ◎米国NIHのガイダンス |
2023-5 | Reporting research misconduct | ukrio | ◎英国の新しいガイダンス |
2023-5 | Which factors are associated with fraud in medical imaging research? | European Journal of Radiology | 〇ねつ造画像原因 |
2023-5 | Whistleblowers need more protection | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇告発者保護 |
2023-5 | Point of View: Beware ‘persuasive communication devices’ when writing and reading scientific articles | eLife | 文章作法 |
2023-5 | What to communicate in retraction notices? | - Xu - Learned Publishing - Wiley Online Library | 有料〇撤回公告 |
2023-5 | NIH toughens enforcement of delayed clinical trials reporting | Science | AAAS | 〇臨床試験報告 |
2023-5 | A conversation with Michael Lauer | Science | AAAS | 〇中国排斥問題 |
2023-5 | Survey Finds Cheating Is Common in Graduate School | Physics | 〇院生カンニング |
2023-5 | Key factors associated with fraud in medical imaging research | Radiology Business | ◎ネカト |
2023-7 | Which factors are associated with fraud in medical imaging research? | European Journal of Radiology | ◎ネカト |
2023-5 | Fostering A Culture Of Trust: Insights On Academic Integrity And Research Ethics – Analysis | Eurasia Review | ◎公正文化 |
2023-5 | Research assessment exercises are necessary — but we need to learn to do them better | nature | 〇評価 |
2023-5 | Opinion: The peer-review process is in need of some scrutiny | Globe and Mail | 〇査読 |
2023-5 | The Newest Way to Buy an Advantage in College Admissions | ProPublica | 〇高校性向け代筆 |
2023-5 | Indian PhDs, professors are paying to publish in real-sounding, fake journals. It's a racket | print | インド代筆 |
2023-5 | When There’s Misconduct From Scientist In Sensitive Organisation Like ISRO, Dismissal From Service Isn’t Illegal: SC Upholds Scientist's Dismissal | verdictum | インド裁判 |
2023-5 | Secretly Funded Climate Obstruction Keeps the Fossil Fuel Fires Burning | ecoRI News | 〇気候変動ウソ |
2023-5 | Guest post: When whistleblowers need lawyers | Retraction Watch | ●告発 |
2023-5 | Top research institute had seven years to act on misconduct complaints | brisbane times | 〇ネカト調査 |
2023-5 | Peer review is broken. Paying referees could fix it | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇査読 |
2023-5 | Support for those affected by scientific misconduct is crucial | Nature Human Behaviour | 有料〇ネカト被災者 |
2023-5 | How This Doctor Wrote Dozens of Science Papers With ChatGPT | daily beast | 〇ChatGPT |
2023-5 | How to publish responsible reproducible research | THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect | 〇ネカト |
2023-5 | How to publish responsible reproducible research | THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect | 〇ネカト |
2023-5 | Supporting diamond open access journals. Interest and feasibility of direct funding mechanisms | bioRxiv | 〇出版 |
2023-5 | Study reveals scale of ‘science scam’ in academic publishing | Financial Times | ●ネカト氾濫 |
2023-5 | One in five articles published in journals may contain faked data | interesting engineering | ●ネカト氾濫 |
2023-5 | Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-flagging Method Indicates Mass Production | medRxiv | ●ネカト氾濫 |
2023-5 | Fake scientific papers are alarmingly common | Science | AAAS | ●ネカト氾濫 |
2023-5 | The Truth Police | BBC Sounds | ◎ネカト警察 |
2023-5 | Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirements | BMC Medicine | Full Text | 9年間で2500憶円ムダ |
2023-5 | Saudi universities entice top scientists to switch affiliations — sometimes with cash | nature | ◎大学ランキング工作 |
2023-5 | Reproducibility and Research Integrity - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee | UK Parliament committee | ●撤回2か月 |
2023-5 | Retractions should not take longer than two months, says UK Parliament committee | Retraction Watch | ●撤回2か月 |
2023-5 | Paper with authorship posted for sale retracted nearly two years after Retraction Watch report | Retraction Watch | ●著者権売買 |
2023-5 | Support for those affected by scientific misconduct is crucial | Nature Human Behaviour | 有料 |
2023-5 | Homeopathy Research Hits New Low | Skeptical Inquirer | ○Homeopathy |
2023-5 | Saudi scientist tells colleagues, ‘Stop this academic fraud’ | Science & Tech | EL PAÍS English | ◎大学ランキング |
2023-4 | One of the worst ever tobacco control papers is ‘corrected’ | The Counterfactual | たばこ |
2023-4 | How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought | Waltman - Learned Publishing - Wiley Online Library | 査読 |
2023-4 | When It Comes to Misconduct, Fellows Appeared Uninformed, Unwilling, Hesitant to Report Suspicions | Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) - JDSupra | ◎Theresa Defino |
2023-4 | Scrutiny for thee but not for me: When open science research isn’t open | Steve Haroz's blog | ◎オープンサイエンス |
2023-4 | Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling | Research Integrity and Peer Review | Full Text | ◎査読コスト |
2023-4 | How Do Scientists Perceive the Relationship Between Ethics and Science? A Pilot Study of Scientists’ Appeals to Values | Science and Engineering Ethics | ◎倫理観 |
2023-4 | REED: More on Self-Correcting Science and Replications: A Critical Review | Replication Network | 再現性 |
2023-4 | EU governments to rein in unfair academic publishers and unsustainable fees | Science|Business | 出版 |
2023-4 | The Double-Cost of Green-via-Gold | Scholarly Kitchen | 出版 |
2023-4 | Reviewer comment on NSF fellowship application sparks outrage on Twitter | C&EN | NSF |
2023-4 | The Geography of Retracted Papers: Showcasing a Crossref–Dimensions–NETSCITY Pipeline for the Spatial Analysis of Bibliographic Data | Orvium | ◎撤回国 Guillaume Cabanac |
2023-4 | Torturing data to predict bitcoin prices: A book excerpt | Retraction Watch | Gary Smith、経済本 |
2023-4 | For inclusivity, we must rethink citation relevance | Times Higher Education (THE) | |
2023-4 | Flawed, futile, and fabricated—features that limit confidence in clinical research in pain and anaesthesia: a narrative review | British Journal of Anaesthesia | ◎麻酔学のネカト |
2023-4 | Advice for respondents. Information and resources for those who are subject to allegations of research misconduct. | UK Research Integrity Office | ◆ネカト被国へのアドバイス:平凡 |
2023-4 | Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford’s Law | Research Integrity and Peer Review | Full Text | ◎ |
2023-4 | University ethics boards are not ready for Indigenous scholars | nature | 人種差別 |
2023-4 | ChatGPT rejection sparks AI debate | Times Higher Education (THE) | ChatGPT |
2023-4 | Scientific authorship in the time of ChatGPT | Opinion | Chemistry World | ChatGPT |
2023-4 | Trends in retractions as AI arms race on misconduct looms | Niche | 論文撤回増 |
2023-4 | Could Ice Cream Possibly Be Good for You? | Atlantic | アイス |
2023-4 | Detection tool developed to fight flood of fake academic papers | Financial Times | 有料 論文工場 |
2023-4 | UWindsor launches hotline for whistleblowers to report misconduct | CBC News | ◎コクハラ |
2023-4 | NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia | Scientific Reports | ◎ |
2023-3 | Changing the paradigm of research | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | ? |
2023 | Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions | Nature Communications | ◎MeRIT |
2023 | Wiley and Hindawi to retract 1,200 more papers for compromised peer review | Retraction Watch | 多量撤回 |
2023 | A high-quality cloned journal has duped hundreds of scholars, and has no reason to stop | Retraction Watch | ◎乗取学術誌 |
2023 | The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals: Threats and Opportunities | FT | ◎論文工場中国 |
2023 | The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals: Threats and Opportunities | JAMA | JAMA Network | 〇巨大学術誌 |
2023 | AI makes plagiarism harder to detect, argue academics – in paper written by chatbot | Guardian | 〇盗用と人工知能 |
2023 | Pall of suspicion: NIH’s secretive ‘China initiative’ has destroyed scores of academic careers | Science | AAAS | 〇中国排斥 |
2023 | The Cape Town Statement on fairness, equity and diversity in research | nature | 〇研究公正 |
2023 | Octopus and ResearchEquals aim to break the publishing mould | nature | 出版 |
2023 | Meet the Stanford Professor at the Center of the Knock-Down, Drag-Out Math Wars | chronicle | 数学教育 |
2023 | Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines | PLOS ONE | ◎透明性 |
2023 | More and more sheets are being pulled out | baltimore gay life | 論文撤回 |
2023 | U.S. government agencies may have been double billed for projects in Wuhan, China, records indicate; probe launched | CBS News | 政府機関詐欺 |
2023 | PNAS is Not a Good Journal - by moin syed | Get Syeducated | ◎出版 |
2023 | Responsible Conduct of Research - Preparedness for Times of Crisis | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science | ◎研究公正 |
2023 | Geneticists should rethink how they use race and ethnicity, panel urges | Science | AAAS | 人種 |
2023 | From Cats to Chatbots: How Non-Humans Are Authoring Scientific Papers | Discover Magazine | ◎著者在順 |
2023 | On peer review—then, now, and soon to be? | PNAS | ◎査読 |
2023 | Catching scientfic fraud could get a lot harder thanks to AI | Register | 〇人工知能 |
2023 | Strife at eLife: inside a journal’s quest to upend science publishing | nature | 出版 |
2023 | When journals don’t meet their ethical guidelines, will anyone hold them accountable? | Retraction Watch | 実験動物 |
2023 | Why open data is critical during review: An example | Steve Haroz;s blog | ◎データ公開 |
2023 | The only way to end scientific fraud is to actually punish the culprits | 著者:Stuart Ritchie | ◎有料記事、ネカト処罰 |
2023 | Deception Detection | Tony Alves | 虚偽検出 |
2023 | Is writing a book chapter still a waste of time? | Impact of Social Sciences | 著書の分担 |
2023 | Is Economics Self-Correcting? Replications in the American Economic Review | Ruhr Economic Papers #1005 | 経済学の総説 |
2023 | Why we usually can't tell when a review is fake | Planet Money : NPR | 評価、口コミ |
2023 | From Piltdown Man to anti-vaxxers ... What science’s worst hoaxes can teach us | Guardian | ◎ネカト |
2023 | Open letter to CNRS: Need for transparent and robust response when research misconduct is found | BishopBlog | ●ネカト透明性。解説済(240815記事) |
2023 | Being positive about negative results | Chemistry World | 〇否定的結果 |
2023 | Misconduct in medical research endangers health | New Indian Express | ◎医学のネカト |
2023 | How many times can a journal be hijacked? | Retraction Watch | ◎乗取学術誌 |
2023 | How to tackle scientific fraud | Economist | ◎ネカト、有料 |
2023 | There is a worrying amount of fraud in medical research | finance.yahoo、Economist | ◎医学のネカト |
2023 | Mirrors and copulation are abominable because they increase the number of mice By Smut Clyde | For Better Science | 〇論文工場 |
2023 | Retracting my paper was painful. But it helped me grow as a scientist | Science | AAAS | 〇撤回経験 |
2023 | Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off | nature | 査読 |
2023 | Inaccuracy in the Scientific Record and Open Postpublication Critique | Perspectives on Psychological Science | 心理学 |
2023 | Campaigner Maria Toft ‘forced out’ of doctorate | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇 盗コク被 |
2023 | Paper with authorship posted for sale retracted over a year after Retraction Watch report | Retraction Watch | ◎ 論文売買 |
2023 | Amending the literature through version control | Biology Letters | |
2023 | Falsifying Attribution for a Bad Pun | Plagiarism Today | ◎ |
2023 | Red flags for paper mills need to go beyond the level of individual articles: a case study of Hindawi special issues | PsyArXiv Preprints | ◎ |
2023 | Highly cited genetics studies found to contain sequence errors | nature | ◎ |
2023 | Scientists, don’t let your writing resemble something you pulled out of your bot | Science | AAAS | ◎ |
2023 | Metrics have their merits | Research Professional News | |
2023 | Post-publication peer reviewing should be compulsory | Times Higher Education (THE) | |
2023 | Elsevier journal under fire for rejecting paper that didn’t cite enough of its old papers | Chemical & Engineering News | |
2023 | As Antarctic Fieldwork Ends, a Sexual Harassment Reckoning Looms | Undark | 〇 |
2023 | ChatGPT: our study shows AI can produce academic papers good enough for journals – just as some ban it | Conversation | |
2023 | The Whack-a-Mole problem: Hijacked journal still being indexed in Scopus even after discovery | Retraction Watch | ◎ |
2023 | Who should take responsibility for integrity in research? | Impact of Social Sciences | ◎ |
2023 | Ghosts, gifts, honours and demands | University Affairs | ◎ |
2023 | Winner take all science | DYNOMIGHT INTERNET NEWSLETTER | ◎ |
2023 | Full article: The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct | Accountability in Research | ◎ |
2023 | Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge | Medical Journals and Publishing | JAMA | ◎ |
2023 | How Scientific is ‘Peer-Reviewed’ Science? | American Council on Science and Health | ◎ |
2023 | How do journals deal with problematic articles. Editorial response of journals to articles commented in PubPeer | Profesional de la información | ◎ |
2023 | A U.S. judge lectures the government on how academic research works | Science | AAAS | ◎ |
2023 | Methodological review would threaten creativity | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎ |
2023 | Germans take six years to act on plagiarism | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎ |
2023 | Study: PhD Researchers Forced to Grant ‘Guest Authorships’ | Laboratory equipment | ◎ |
2023 | Is science really getting less disruptive — and does it matter if it is? | Nature | ◎ |
2023 | Young physicists say ethics rules are being ignored | Nature | ◎ |
2023 | Full article: Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe | Accountability in Research | 〇 |
2023 | Publish less, disrupt more | University Affairs | ◎ |
2023 | Are universities doing enough to address academic misconduct in research? | University Affairs | ◎ |
2023 | Multimillion-dollar trade in paper authorships alarms publishers | Nature | 〇 |
2023 | Self-publishing is common among academic-journal editors | Nature | 〇 |
2023 | Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors | Nature Human Behaviour | 〇 |
2023 | Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time | Nature | ◎ |
2023 | What Happened to All of Science’s Big Breakthroughs? | New York Times | ◎ |
2023 | A Conflict of Interests – Manipulating Peer Review or Research as Usual? | Digital Science | 〇 |
2023 | Scientific fraud: The dark side of research | | 〇 |
2023 | Why are journals so slow at corrections and retractions? | STAT | 〇 |
2023 | Guest Post - Publishers Should Be Transparent About the Capabilities and Limitations of Software They Use to Detect Image Manipulation or Duplication | The Scholarly Kitchen | 〇 |
2023 | Alarmed by A.I. Chatbots, Universities Start Revamping How They Teach | New York Times | |
2023 | Science: 5 things you can do to stop getting tricked by bad science writing in 2023 | i News | ◎ |
2023 | Unearned authorship pervades science | nature | ◎ |
2023 | Multimillion-dollar trade in paper authorships alarms publishers | nature | |
2023 | Scientific Fraud Is Slippery to Catch—but Easier to Combat | WIRED | 〇 |
2023 | ‘Institute for facts’ aims to smash fake news | |Times Higher Education (THE) | |
2023 | Do journals need societies, and do societies need journals? | Impact of Social Sciences | |
2023 | Hotspots of academic misconduct and misrepresentations among academics in the Republic of Poland, a European Union member state | OSF Preprints | |
2022 | 'An Open Secret’: Harvard Graduate Students Decry Harassment, Neglect from Faculty | Harvard Crimson | ●アカ |
2022 | Blind spots on western blots: a meta-research study highlighting opportunities to improve figures and methods reporting | bioRxiv | 〇バンド |
2022 | Chinese research reforms ‘a PR exercise’ | Times Higher Education (THE) | 〇中国の科学 |
2022 | How a Beloved Teacher Repeatedly Groomed Girls for Sex | Insider | 性不正 |
2022 | How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code | Accountability in Research | |
2022 | Journal editors and publishers’ legal obligations with respect to medical research misconduct | Research Ethics | 〇 |
2022 | An evaluation of the process of peer review | Palynology | 〇 |
2022 | The rise and fall of peer review | by Adam Mastroianni | 〇 |
2022 | The Laws of Science | by Niko McCarty - New Science | 〇 |
2022 | Stakeholders’ Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries | Science and Engineering Ethics | 〇 |
2022 | What’s integrity got to do with it? Second-year experiences of the Path2Integrity e-learning programme | FACETS | 〇 |
2022 | FDA oversight of clinical trials is “grossly inadequate,” say experts | BMJ | 〇臨床研究 |
2022 | Preventing fraud in biomedical research | Front. Cardiovasc. Med. | 〇 |
2022 | White House's open-access directive scrambles long-entrenched models | STAT | 論文閲覧無料 |
2022 | Removing author fees can help open access journals make research available to everyone | Conversation | 論文閲覧無料 |
2022 | US scientists wary of author publication fees | |Times Higher Education (THE) | 論文閲覧無料 |
2022 | OSTP Issues Guidance to Make Federally Funded Research Freely Available Without Delay | OSTP | The White House | 論文閲覧無料 |
2022 | White House requires immediate public access to all U.S.-funded research papers by 2025 | Science | 論文閲覧無料 |
2022 | Combatting Predatory Academic Journals and Conferences (Full Report in English) | IAP | ◎捕食学術誌・研究会 |
2021 | A scientist critic was sued, and won — but did not emerge unscathed. This is his story. | Retraction Watch | ●ネカト者が訴訟 |
2021 | Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them | Journal of Medical Ethics | 〇 |
2021 | When is ‘self-plagiarism' OK? New guidelines offer researchers rules for recycling text | Science | |
2020-2 | 科学的不正行為に関するデータと歴史的視点(追加データで4回更新)--- Some data and historical perspective on scientific misconduct (UPDATEDx4 with additional data) | Dynamic Ecology | ●Jeremy Fox |
2019 | Development of research integrity in France is on the rise: the introduction of research integrity officers was a progress | Research Integrity and Peer Review | ◎仏RIO |
2019 | Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium | Science and Engineering Ethics | ◎ |
2019 | US scientists plan new watchdog to tackle research misconduct | Times Higher Education (THE) | Times Higher Education (THE) | ◎ |
2018-10 | いいえ、それはインセンティブではありません。あなたです --- No, it’s not The Incentives—it’s you | Tal Yarkoni | ●なぜネカト? |
2018 | China introduces ‘social’ punishments for scientific misconduct | nature | 有料◎中国厳罰化 |
2017 | Pay to play? Three new ways companies are subverting academic publishing | Retraction Watch | ◎学術出版をカネで堕落させる動き |
2015 | What should an ideal retraction notice look like? | Retraction Watch | ◎論文撤回 |
2015 | Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of the Peer-Reviewed Literature | JAMA Network | ◎ |